Assessing and taking into account the subjects' experience and knowledge in consumer studies. Application to the free sorting of wine glasses

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 317-327

  Faye, P ^a,b   Courcoux, P ^a,b   Giboreau, A ^c   Qannari, E M ^a,b  

^a LUNAM UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c Institut Paul Bocuse   (France)

Author keywords

Central partition; Consumer; Free sorting; MDS; Perception; Rasch model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869763804     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ballester J., Patris B., Symoneaux R., Valentin D. Conceptual vs perceptual wine spaces: Does expertise matter?. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:267-276.
2. Borg I., Groenen P. Modern multidimensional scaling. Theory and applications. Springer series in statistics 1997, Springer Verlag, New York.
3. Boomsma A., Van Duijn M.A.J., Snijders T.A.B. Essays on item response theory 2000, Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Cartier R., Rytz A., Lecomte A., Poblete F., Krystlik J., Belin E., et al. Sorting procedure as an alternative to quantitative descriptive analysis to obtain a product sensory map. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:562-571.
5. Chollet S., Valentin D. Le degré d'expertise a- t-il une influence sur la perception olfactive? Quelques éléments de réponses dans le domaine du vin In L'année psychologique. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 2000, 100:11-36.
6. Dacremont C., Soufflet I. Impact of fabric end-use knowledge on handle perception. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée 2006, 56:273-277.
7. Dubois, D. (Ed.). (1991). Sémantique et cognition. Catégories, prototypes, typicalité. Editions du CNRS, Collection Sciences du langage, Paris.
8. Faye P., Brémaud D., Daubin M.D., Courcoux P., Giboreau A., Nicod H. Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: An alternative to descriptive mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:781-791.
9. Fischer G.H., Molenaar I.W. Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications 1995, Springer-Verlag, New York.
10. Frost M.B., Noble A.C. Preliminary study of the effect of knowledge and sensory expertise on liking for red wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2002, 53(4):275-284.
11. Gordon A.D., Vichi M. Partitions of partitions. Journal of Classification 1998, 15:265-285.
12. Giboreau A., Navarro S., Faye P., Dumortier J. Sensory evaluation of automotive fabrics: The contribution of categorization tasks and non verbal information to set-up a descriptive method of tactile properties. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:311-322.
13. Hubert L.J., Arabie P. Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification 1985, 2:193-218.
14. Johnson T.E., Bastian S.E.P. A preliminary study of the relationship between Australian wine consumers' wine expertise and their wine purchasing and consumption behaviour. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2007, 13:186-197.
15. Krieger A.M., Green P.E. A generalized Rand-Index method for consensus clustering of separate partitions of the same data base. Journal of Classification 1999, 16:63-89.
16. Kruskal J.B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika 1964, 29:115-129.
17. Langlois J. Les expertises dans le domaine du vin: cas du concept de vin de garde. Thèse de doctorat 2010, Université de Bourgogne, France.
18. Lawless H. Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chemical Senses 1989, 14(3):349-360.
19. Lawless H., Sheng N., Knoops Stan S.C.P. Multidimensional scaling of sorting data applied to cheese perception. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:91-98.
20. Lelièvre M., Chollet S., Abdi H., Valentin D. What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:697-703.
21. Lelièvre M. (2010). De la première gorgée de bière au concept: le même processus pour tous? Thèse de doctorat. Université de Bourgogne, France.
22. Minaudier J.P. Connaissez-vous la France? 2009, Société éditrice du Monde, Paris.
23. Parr W., Green J.A., White K.G., Sherlock R.R. The distinctive flavour of New Zeland Sauvignon blanc: Sensory characterisation by wine professionals. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:849-861.
24. Picard D., Dacremont C., Valentin D., Giboreau A. Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychologica 2003, 114:165-184.
25. Popper R., Heymann H. Analyzing differences among products and panelists by multidimensional scaling. Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science 1996, 159-164. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. T. Naes, E. Risvik (Eds.).
26. Recchia A., Monteleone E., Tuorila H. Responses to extra virgin olive oils in consumers with varying commitment to oils. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:153-161.
27. Rosch E., Mervis C.B., Gray W.D., Johnson D.M., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:573-605.
28. Schiffman S.S., Reynolds M.L., Young F.W. Introduction to multidimensional scaling. Theory, methods and applications 1981, AcademicPress, Orlando.
29. Solar (ed.) (2008). L'art de déguster le vin. La belle école, Paris.
30. Soufflet I., Calonnier M., Dacremont C. A comparison between industrial experts' and novices' haptic perceptual organization: A tool to identify descriptors of the handle fabrics. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:689-699.
31. Williams E.J. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Ser. 1949, 2:149-168.