Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 867-882

  Hays, Nicholas A ^a   Bendersky, Corinne ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Hierarchy; Mutability; Power; Status

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; MALE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL MOBILITY; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84929511242     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000017     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
2. Anderson, C., Ames, D. R., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one's status in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 90-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207307489
3. Anderson, C., Brion, S., Moore, D. A., & Kennedy, J. A. (2012). A status-enhancement account of overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 718-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029395
4. Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002
5. Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1362
6. Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
7. Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009a). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x
8. Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009b). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling ef-fects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014201
9. Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094
10. Anderson, C., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077-1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027409
11. Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12. Bales, R. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. In E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb, & E. Hartley (Eds.), Social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 437-447). New York, NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
13. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2088276
14. Barkow, J. H. (1975). Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation. Current Anthropology, 16, 553-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/201619
15. Belliveau, M. A., O'Reilly, C. A., & Wade, J. B. (1996). Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1568-1593. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257069
16. Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23, 323-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0734
17. Bendersky, C., & Shah, N. P. (2012). The costs of status attainment:Performance effects of individuals' status mobility in task groups. Organization Science, 23, 308-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0543
18. Bendersky, C., & Shah, N. P. (2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 387-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0316
19. Berger, J., Connor, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory:A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.
20. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.002403
21. Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2011). What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organization Science, 22, 1040-1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0558
22. Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 994-1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026651
23. Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2014). What's in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 71-95). New York, NY: Springer.
24. Blader, S. L., Shirako, A., & Chen, Y. R. (2013). Looking out from the top:Differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Unpublished manuscript.
25. Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556637
26. Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
27. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814365
28. Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363-1368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610383437
29. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
30. Christie, A. M., & Barling, J. (2010). Beyond status: Relating status inequality to performance and health in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 920-934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019856
31. Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power's far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x
32. Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 391-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.013
33. Fast, N. J., & Joshi, P. D. (2014). Decision making at the top: Benefits and barriers. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 227-242). New York, NY: Springer.
34. Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123-1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1123
35. Fragale, A. R. (2006). The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 243-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.004
36. Fragale, A. R., Overbeck, J. R., & Neale, M. A. (2011). Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets' power and status positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 767-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.006
37. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
38. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
39. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation:Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012633
40. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x
41. Greer, L. L., & van Kleef, G. A. (2010). Equality versus differentiation:The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1032-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020373
42. Groysberg, B., Polzer, J. T., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2011). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science, 22, 722-737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0547
43. Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Cohen, T. R., & Livingston, R. W. (2012). Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 351-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025515
44. Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2012). When hierarchy wins: Evidence from the national basketball association. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 398-406.
45. Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402-1413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291006
46. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
47. Hogan, R. T., & Hogan, J. (1991). Personality and status. In D. G. Gilbert & J. J. Connolly (Eds.), Personality, social skills, and psychopathology:An individual differences approach (pp. 137-154). New York, NY:Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0635-9_6
48. James, L., Demaree, R., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
49. Kalkhoff, W. (2005). Collective validation in multi-actor task groups: The effects of status differentiation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 57-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800105
50. Kay, A. C., Wheeler, S. C., Bargh, J. A., & Ross, L. (2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.06.003
51. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
52. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442810033001
53. Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261010
54. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 80-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2626958
55. Loch, C. H., Huberman, B. A., & Stout, S. (2000). Status competition and performance in work groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43, 35-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00107-4
56. Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The selfreinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628
57. Magee, J. C., Milliken, F. J., & Lurie, A. R. (2010). Power differences in the construal of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 354-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209360418
58. Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732
59. Maner, J. K., & Mead, N. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 482-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018559
60. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self. Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
61. McClelland, D. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2
63. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1988). An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S154-S179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228945
64. Orme, B. K. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, WI: Research Publishers, LLC.
65. Owens, D. A., & Sutton, R. I. (2001). Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work:Advances in theory and research (pp. 299-316). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Pettit, N. C., Yong, K., & Spataro, S. E. (2010). Holding your place:Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 396-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.007
67. Ridgeway, C. L. (1981). Nonconformity, competence, and influence in groups: A test of 2 theories. American Sociological Review, 46, 333-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095064
68. Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095663
69. Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23, 669-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611433876
70. Savin-Williams, R. C. (1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development, 50, 923-935. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129316
71. Sherman, G. D., Lee, J. J., Cuddy, A. J. C., Renshon, J., Oveis, C., Gross, J. J., & Lerner, J. S. (2012). Leadership is associated with lower levels of stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 17903-17907.
72. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis:Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001
73. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
74. Strathern, A. (1971). The rope of Moka: Big-men and ceremonial exchange in Mount Hagen, New Guinea (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558160
75. Strauss, A., Schatzman, L., Ehrlich, D., Bucher, R., & Sabshin, M. (1963). The hospital and its negotiated order. In E. Freidson (Ed.), The hospital in modern society (pp. 147-169). New York, NY: Free Press.
76. Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 354-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023779
77. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
78. Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400102
79. Willer, R., Feinberg, M., Flynn, F. J., & Simpson, B. (2013). The duality of generosity: Altruism and status-seeking motivate prosocial behavior. Unpublished manuscript.
80. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York, NY: The Free Press.
81. Wright, S. C. (1997). Ambiguity, social influence, and collective action:Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1277-1290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672972312005
82. Wright, S. C. (2010). Collective action and social change. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 577-595). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n35
83. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994