Collective action and social change

The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 577-596

  Wright, Stephen C ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949779847     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446200919.n35     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Bandura, A.(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York:Freeman.
2. Barreto, M. Ellemers, N., &Palacios, M. S. The backlash of token mobility: The impact of past group experiences on individual ambition and effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,1433-1445. (2004).
3. Blader, S. What leads organizational members to collectivize? Injustice and identification as precursors of union certification. Organization Science, 18,108-126. (2007).
4. Blair, I., &Jost, J. Exit, loyalty, and collective action among workers in a simulated business environment: Interactive effects of group identification and boundary permeability. Social Justice Research, 16,95-108. (2003).
5. Brewer, M.(2009). Motivations underlying ingroup identification: Optimal distinctiveness and beyond. In S.Otten, T.Kessler, & K.Sassenberg (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 3-22).New York:Psychology Press.
6. Brown, R., &Hewstone, M.(2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343).San Diego, CA:Elsevier Academic Press.
7. Condor, S.(1986) Sex role beliefs and 'traditional women': Feminists and intergroup perspectives. In S.Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice. Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
8. Deaux, K. Reid, A. Martin, D., &Bikmen, N. Ideologies of diversity and inequality: Predicting collective action in groups varying in ethnicity and immigrant status. Political Psychology, 27,123-146. (2006).
9. Derks, B. van Laar, C., &Ellemers, N. Working for the self or working for the group: How self-versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96,183-202. (2009).
10. Dixon, J.A. Durrheim, K., &Tredoux, C. Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18,867-872. (2007).
11. Doosje, B., &Ellemers, N.(1997). Stereotyping under threat: The role of group identification. In R.Spears & P. J.Oakes (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 257-272).Oxford:Blackwell.
12. Drury, J., &Reicher, S. D. Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35,35-38. (2005).
13. Ellemers, N.(2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 205-222).New York, NY US:Cambridge University Press.
14. Ellemers, N. Spears, R., &Doosje, B. Sticking together of falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,617-626. (1997).
15. GaertnerS.L., &Dovidio, J. F.(2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA:Psychology Press.
16. Gamson, W. A.(1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D.Morris & C.McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-76).New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
17. Hopkins, N., &Kahani-Hopkins, V. Minority group members' theories of intergroup contact: A case study of British Muslims' conceptualizations of 'Islamophobia' and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45,245-264. (2006).
18. Hornsey, M. Blackwood, L. Louis, W. Fielding, K. Favor, K. Morton, T., et al. Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36,1701-1722. (2006).
19. Hornsey, M., &Hogg, M.(2000). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 948-958.
20. Iyer, A. Schmader, T., &Lickel, B. Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33,572-587. (2007).
21. Jetten, J. Iyer, A. Tsivrikos, D., &Young, B. When is individual mobility costly? The role of economic and social identity factors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38,866-879. (2008).
22. Jost, J., & Major, B. (Eds.) (2001). The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press.
23. Kay, A. Gaucher, D. Napier, J. Callan, M., &Laurin, K. God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95,18-35. (2008).
24. Kessler, T., &Mummendey, A. Sequential or parallel processes? A longitudinal field study concerning determinants of identity-management strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,75-88. (2002).
25. Klandermans, B.(1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, England:Blackwell.
26. Lalonde, R. N., &Silverman, R. A. Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,78-85. (1994).
27. LeBon, G.(1895, translated 1947). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London:Ernest Benn.
28. Leach, C. Iyer, A., &Pedersen, A. Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32,1232-1245. (2006).
29. Mallett, R. Huntsinger, J. Sinclair, S., &Swim, J. Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11,451-470. (2008).
30. Martin, J. Brickman, P., &Murray, A. Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20,484-496. (1984).
31. McAdam, D., McGarthyJ.D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.), (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York:Cambridge University Press.
32. Morton, T. Postmes, T. Haslam, S., &Hornsey, M. Theorizing gender in the face of socialchange: Is there anything essential about essentialism?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96,653-664. (2009).
33. Mummendey, A. Kessler, T. Klink, A., &Mielke, R. Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,229-245. (1999).
34. Mummendey, A. Wenzel, M. Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 3,158-174(1999).
35. Pettigrew, T. F. Social psychology and desegregation research. American Psychologist, 16,105-112. (1961).
36. Reicher, S. D. The context of social identity: Domination, resistance and change. Political Psychology, 25,921-946. (2004).
37. Reicher, S., &Haslam, S. A. Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45,1-40. (2006).
38. Reynolds, K. Oakes, P. Haslam, A. Nolan, M., &Dolnik, L. Responses to powerlessness: Stereotyping as an instrument of social conflict. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4,275-290. (2000).
39. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., Pratto, F. (in press). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science.
40. Schmitt, M. T., &Branscombe, N. R.(2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 167-199).Chichester, England:Wiley.
41. Sidanius, J., &Pratto, F.(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York:Cambridge University Press.
42. Simon, B., &KlandermansB. Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56,319-331. (2001).
43. Skitka, L. J., &Bauman, C. W. Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29,29-54. (2008).
44. Smith, H. Cronin, T., &Kessler, T. Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members' emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology, 29,221-246. (2008).
45. Smith, H. J., &Ortiz, D. J.(2002). Is it just me?: The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I.Walker & H. J.Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration (pp. 91-118).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
46. Smith, H. Spears, R., &Owen, M. "People like us": The influence of personal deprivation and group membership salience on justice evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30,277-299. (1994).
47. Stott, C. Adang, O. Livingstone, A., &Schreiber, M. Variability in the collective behaviour of England fans at Euro2004: 'Hooliganism', public order policing and social change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37,75-100. (2007).
48. Stott, C., &Drury, J. The importance of social structure and social interaction in stereotype consensus and content: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34,11-23. (2004).
49. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., &Williams, R. M.(1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during armylife (Vol. 1).Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
50. Stürmer, S., &Simon, B.(2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 59-99).Chichester, England:Wiley.
51. Tajfel, H. (Ed.) (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
52. Tajfel, H., &Turner, J. C.(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.Austin, & S.Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48).Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole.
53. Taylor, D. M., &McKirnan, D. J. A five stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23,291-300. (1984).
54. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., &Wetherell, M. S.(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York:Blackwell.
55. Van Zomeren, M. Postmes, T., &Spears, R. Toward an integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134,504-535. (2008).
56. Van Zomeren, M. Spears, R. Fischer, A. H., &Leach, C. W. Put your money where your mouth is!: Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87,649-664. (2004).
57. Verkuyten, M., &Reijerse, A. Intergroup structure and identity management among ethnic minority and majority groups: The interactive effects of perceived stability, legitimacy, and permeability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38,106-127. (2008).
58. Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.) (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and Integration. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
59. Wright, S. C. Ambiguity, shared consensus and collective action: Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,1277-1290(1997).
60. Wright, S. C.(2001a). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R.Brown & S. L.Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 409-430).Oxford, England:Blackwell.
61. Wright, S. C.(2001b). Restricted intergroup boundaries: Tokenism, ambiguity and the tolerance of injustice. In J.Jost & B.Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 223-254).NewYork:Cambridge University Press.
62. Wright, S.C., &Lubensky, M.(2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In S.Demoulin, J. P.Leyens, & J. F.Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291-310).Philadelphia, PA:Psychology Press.
63. Wright, S.C., &Richard, N. T.(2010). Cross-group helping: Perspectives on why and why not. In S.Stürmer and M.Snyder (Eds.), The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping (pp. 311-335).Wiley Blackwell.
64. Wright, S. C. Taylor, D. M., &Moghaddam, F. M. Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,994-1003. (1990).
65. Wright, S. C, &Tropp, L. R.(2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. In I.Walker & H. J.Smith, (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 200-236).New York:Cambridge University Press.