Centromere-associated meiotic drive and female fitness variation in Mimulus

Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1208-1218

  Fishman, Lila ^a   Kelly, John K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Balancing selection; Centromere; Genetic conflict; Polymorphism; Seedset; Selfish genetic element; Standing variation

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; COEVOLUTION; FEMALE; FISH; FITNESS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLEIOTROPY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE COST; WILD POPULATION;

CALIFORNIA; IRON MOUNTAIN; UNITED STATES;

MIMULUS (ANGIOSPERM); MIMULUS GUTTATUS;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MEIOSIS; MIMULUS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT INFERTILITY; RECESSIVE GENE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, RECESSIVE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MEIOSIS; MIMULUS; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANT INFERTILITY; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 84929506980     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12661     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ardlie, K. G. 1998. Putting the brake on drive: meiotic drive of t haplotypes in natural populations of mice. Trends Genet. 14:189-193.
2. Birchler, J. A., R. K. Dawe, and J. F. Doebley . 2003. Marcus Rhoades, preferential segregation and meiotic drive. Genetics 164:835-841.
3. Bodbyl Roels, S. A., and J. K. Kelly . 2011. Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 65:2541-2552.
4. Buckler, E. S. I., T. L. Phelps-Durr, C. S. K. Buckler, R. K. Dawe, J. F. Doebley, and T. P. Holtsford . 1999. Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome. Genetics 153:415-426.
5. Burt, A., and R. Trivers . 2008. Genes in conflict. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Carr, D. E., T. H. Roulston, and H. Hart . 2014. Inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus reduces visitation by bumble bee pollinators. PLoS One 9:e101463.
7. Carroll, L. S., S. Meagher, L. Morrison, D. J. Penn, and W. K. Potts . 2004. Fitness effects of a selfish gene (the Mus t complex) are revealed in an ecological context. Evolution 58:1318-1328.
8. Chevin, L.-M., and F. Hospital . 2006. The hitchhiking effect of an autosomal meiotic drive gene. Genetics 173:1829-1832.
9. Crow, J. F. 1991. Why is Mendelian segregation so exact? Bioessays 13:305-312.
10. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura . 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York.
11. Dawe, R. K., and W. Z. Cande . 1996. Induction of centromeric activity in maize by suppressor of meiotic drive 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8512-8517.
12. Dawe, R. K., and E. N. Hiatt . 2004. Plant neocentromeres: fast, focused, and driven. Chromosome Res. 12:655-669.
13. Fishman, L. 2013. Female meiotic drive in monkeyflowers: insight into the population genetics of selfish centromeres. Pp. 129-145 in J. Jiang and J. A. Birchler, eds. Plant centromere biology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
14. Fishman, L., and A. Saunders . 2008. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322:1559-1562.
15. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis . 2005. A novel meiotic drive locus almost completely distorts segregation in Mimulus (monkeyflower) hybrids. Genetics 169:347-353.
16. Fishman, L.. 2008. Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 177:802-810.
17. Flagel, L. E., J. H. Willis, and T. J. Vision . 2014. The standing pool of genomic structural variation in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus. Genome Biol. Evol. 6:53-64.
18. Gilliland, W. D., E. M. Colwell, D. M. Osiecki, S. Park, D. Lin, C. Rathnam, and D. A. Barbash . 2015. Normal segregation of a foreign-species chromosome during Drosophila female meiosis despite extensive heterochromatin divergence. Genetics 199:73-83.
19. Hartl, D. L. 1970. Analysis of a general population genetic model of meiotic drive. Evolution 24:538-545.
20. Henikoff, S., K. Ahmad, and H. S. Malik . 2001. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293:1098-1102.
21. Hiatt, E. N., and R. K. Dawe . 2003. Four loci on abnormal chromosome 10 contribute to meiotic drive in maize. Genetics 164:699-709.
22. Hurst, G. D., and J. H. Werren . 2001. The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution. Nature Rev. Genet. 2:597-606.
23. Johnson, N. A. 2010. Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield? Trends Genet. 26:317-325.
24. Kanizay, L. B., T. Pyhajarvi, E. G. Lowry, M. B. Hufford, D. G. Peterson, J. Ross-Ibarra, and R. K. Dawe . 2013. Diversity and abundance of the abnormal chromosome 10 meiotic drive complex in Zea mays. Heredity 110:570-577.
25. Kelly, J. K. 2003. Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 164:1071-1085.
26. Kelly, J. K., and J. Willis . 2001. Deleterious mutations and genetic variation for flower size in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 55:937-942.
27. Kelly, J. K., and J. H. Willis . 2002. A manipulative experiment to estimate biparental inbreeding in monkeyflowers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163:575-579.
28. Larracuente, A. M., and D. C. Presgraves . 2012. The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192:33-53.
29. Lekberg, Y., B. Roskilly, M. F. Hendrick, C. A. Zabinski, C. M. Barr, and L. Fishman . 2012. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation among yellow monkeyflower populations from thermal and non-thermal soils in Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 170:111-122.
30. Llaurens, V., L. Gonthier, and S. Billiard . 2009. The sheltered genetic load linked to the S locus in plants: new insights From theoretical and empirical approaches in sporophytic self-incompatibility. Genetics 183:1105-1118.
31. Lowry, D. B., R. C. Rockwood, and J. H. Willis . 2008. Ecological reproductive isolation of coast and inland races of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 62:2196-2214.
32. Lyttle, T. W. 1991. Segregation distorters. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25:511-557.
33. Malik, H. S., and S. Henikoff . 2002. Conflict begets complexity: the evolution of centromeres. Curr. Opin. Genet. Devel. 12:711-718.
34. Manser, A., A. K. Lindholm, B. König, and H. C. Bagheri . 2011. Polyandry and the decrease of a selfish genetic element in a wild house mouse population. Evolution 65:2435-2447.
35. McKee, B. D., K. Wilhelm, C. Merrill, and X. Ren . 1998. Male sterility and meiotic drive associated with sex chromosome rearrangements in Drosophila. Genetics 149:143-155.
36. Mojica, J. P., and J. K. Kelly . 2010. Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential component of natural selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277:2945-2950.
37. Mojica, J. P., Y. W. Lee, J. H. Willis, and J. K. Kelly . 2012. Spatially and temporally varying selection on intrapopulation quantitative trait loci for a life history trade-off in Mimulus guttatus. Mol. Ecol. 21:3718-3728.
38. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F., and C. Sapienza . 2001a. Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals. Genetics 159:1179-1189.
39. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F. 2001b. Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm. Genome 12:331-339.
40. Patten, M. M. 2014. Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus. J. Evol. Biol. 27:2360-2370.
41. Prout, T. 2000. How well does opposing selection maintain variation? Pp. 157-181 in R. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
42. Rhoades, M. M. 1942. Preferential segregation in maize. Genetics 27:395-407.
43. Robertson, A. W., C. Mountjoy, B. E. Faulkner, M. V. Roberts, and M. R. Macnair . 1999. Bumble bee selection of Mimulus guttatus flowers: the effects of pollen quality and reward depletion. Ecology 80:2594-2606.
44. Scoville, A., Y. W. Lee, J. H. Willis, and J. K. Kelly . 2009. Contribution of chromosomal polymorphisms to the G-matrix of Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 183:803-815.
45. Scoville, A. G., Y. W. Lee, J. H. Willis, and J. K. Kelly . 2011. Explaining the heritability of an ecologically significant trait in terms of individual quantitative trait loci. Biol. Lett. 7:896-898.
46. Stone, J. L. 2004. Sheltered load associated with S-alleles in Solanum carolinense. Heredity 92:335-342.
47. Sweigart, A., K. Karoly, A. Jones, and J. H. Willis . 1999. The distribution of individual inbreeding coefficients and pairwise relatedness in a population of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 83:625-632.
48. Turner, B. C., and D. D. Perkins . 1979. Spore killer, a chromosomal factor in Neurospora that kills meiotic products not containing it. Genetics 93:587-606.
49. Wedell, N. 2013. The dynamic relationship between polyandry and selfish genetic elements. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 368:1-10.
50. Willis, J. H. 1993. Partial self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in two populations of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 71:145-154.
51. Wu, C. A., D. B. Lowry, A. M. Cooley, K. M. Wright, Y. W. Lee, and J. H. Willis . 2007. Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100:220-230.