Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2541-2552

  Bodbyl Roels, Sarah A ^a   Kelly, John K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Evolutionary rescue; Experimental evolution; Mating systems; Pollinators

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; AUTOGAMY; BEE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; DICOTYLEDON; DISEASE INCIDENCE; DIVERGENCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; HABITAT LOSS; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; OUTCROSSING; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLEN; POLLINATOR; POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MIMULUS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BEES; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; MIMULUS; OREGON; POLLINATION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MIMULUS GUTTATUS;

EID: 80052224854     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01326.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Agrawal, A. F., E. D. Brodie, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2001. Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix. Genetica 112-113:33-43.
2. Arathi, H. S., and J. K. Kelly. 2004. Corolla morphology facilitates both autogamy and bumblebee pollination in Mimulus guttatus. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165:139-145.
3. Armbruster, P., and D. H. Reed. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235-242.
4. Awadalla, P., and K. Ritland. 1997. Microsatellite variation and evolution in the Mimulus guttatus species complex with contrasting mating systems. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1023-1034.
5. Baker, H. G. 1967. Support for Baker's Law-as a rule. Evolution 21:853-856.
6. Bell, G., and A. Gonzalez. 2009. Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction following environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 12:942-948.
7. Cameron, S. A., H. M. Hines, and P. H. Williams. 2007. A comprehensive phylogeny of the bumble bees (Bombus). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 91:161-188.
8. Carr, D. E., and M. R. Dudash. 1996. Inbreeding depression in two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Am. J. Bot. 83:586-593.
9. Carr, D. E., and C. B. Fenster. 1994. Levels of genetic variation and covariation for Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) floral traits. Heredity 72:606-618.
10. Charlesworth, D. 2003. Effect of inbreeding on genetic diversity of populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358:1051-1070.
11. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
12. Committee on the Status of Pollinators in North America. 2007. Fruits of their labour: status of pollinators in North America. National Academies Press, Washington DC.
13. Dole, J. A. 1992. Reproductive assurance mechanisms in three taxa of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79:650-659.
14. Eckert, C. G., S. Kalisz, M. A. Geber, R. Sargent, E. Elle, P. O. Cheptou, C. Goodwillie, M. O. Johnston, J. K. Kelly, D. A. Moeller, et al. 2010. Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:35-43.
15. Fenster, C. B., and K. Ritland. 1994. Evidence for natural selection on mating system in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 155:588-596.
16. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11:53-63.
17. Fishman, L., A. J. Kelly, and J. H. Willis. 2002. Minor quantitative trait loci underlie floral traits associated with mating system divergence in Mimulus. Evolution 56:2138-2155.
18. Fishman, L., and A. Saunders. 2008. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322:1559-1562.
19. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis. 2008. Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 177:802-810.
20. Franklin, H. J. 1912. The Bombidae of the new world. Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. 38:177-486.
21. Gomulkiewicz, R., and R. D. Holt. 1995. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 49:201-207.
22. Gomulkiewicz, R., R. D. Holt, M. Barfield, and S. L. Nuismer. 2010. Genetics, adaptation and invasion in harsh environments. Evol. Appl. 3:97-108.
23. Grant, A. L. 1924. A monograph of the genus Mimulus. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 11:99-398.
24. Grant, V. 1949. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms. Evolution 3:82-97.
25. Hall, M. C., and J. H. Willis. 2005. Transmission ratio distortion in intraspecific hybrids of Mimulus guttatus: implications for genomic divergence. Genetics 170:375-386.
26. Harris, D. L. 1964. Genotypic covariances between inbred relatives. Genetics 50:1319-1348.
27. Hegland, S. J., A. Nielsen, A. Lázaro, A.-L. Bjerknes, and Ø. Totland. 2009. How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? Ecol. Lett. 12:184-195.
28. Holeski, L. M., and J. K. Kelly. 2006. Mating system and the evolution of quantitative traits: an experimental study of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 60:711-723.
29. Igic, B., R. Lande, and J. R. Kohn. 2008. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169:93-104.
30. Ivey, C. T., and D. E. Carr. 2005. Effects of herbivory and inbreeding on the pollinators and mating system of Mimulus guttatus (Phrymaceae). Am. J. Bot. 92:1641-1649.
31. Kalisz, S., D. W. Vogler, and K. M. Hanley. 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430:884-887.
32. Kelly, J. K. 2003. Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 164:1071-1085.
33. Kelly, J. K. 2008. Testing the rare alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection. Genetica 132:187-198.
34. Kelly, J. K., and H. S. Arathi. 2003. Inbreeding and the genetic variance of floral traits in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 90:77-83.
35. Kelly, J. K., and J. H. Willis. 2002. A manipulative experiment to estimate bi-parental inbreeding in Monkeyflowers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163:575-579.
36. Kelly, J. K., A. Rasch, and S. Kalisz. 2002. A method to estimate pollen viability from pollen size variation. Am. J. Bot. 89:1021-1023.
37. Kiang, Y. T., and J. L. Hamrick. 1978. Reproductive isolation in the Mimulus guttatus-M. nasutus complex. Am. Midl. Nat. 100:269-276.
38. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
39. Lee, Y. W. 2009. Genetic analysis of standing variation for floral morphology and fitness components in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus (common monkeyflower). Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.
40. Levin, D. A. 1988. Local differentiation and the breeding structure of plant populations. Pp. 305-329 in L. D. Gottleib, and S. K. Jain, eds. Plant evolutionary biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
41. Levin, D. A. 2010. Environment-enhanced self-fertilization: implications for niche shifts in adjacent populations. J. Ecol. 98:1276-1283.
42. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113:67-79.
43. Lynch, M., and R. Lande. 1993. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. Pp. 234-250 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, eds. Biotic interactions and global climate change. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
44. Lynch, M., and K. Ritland. 1999. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:1753-1766.
45. Macnair, M. R. 1989. A new species of Mimulus endemic to copper mines in California. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 100:1-14.
46. Macnair, M. R., and Q. J. Cumbes. 1989. The genetic architecture of interspecific variation in Mimulus. Genetics 122:211-222.
47. Macnair, M. R., V. E. Macnair, and B. E. Martin. 1989. Adaptive speciation in Mimulus: an ecological comparison of Mimulus cupriphilus with its presumed progenitor Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 112:269-279.
48. Macnair, M. R., and M. Gardner. 1999. The evolution of edaphic endemics. Pp. 157-171 in D. J. Howard, and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
49. Marriage, T. N., S. Hudman, M. E. Mort, M. E. Orive, R. G. Shaw, and J. K. Kelly. 2009. Direct estimation of the mutation rate at dinucleotide microsatellite loci in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Heredity 103:310-317.
50. Martin, N. 2004. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evol. Ecol. 6:777-782.
51. Memmott, J., P. G. Craze, N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price. 2007. Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol. Lett. 10:710-717.
52. Mitchell, R. J., J. D. Karron, K. G. Holmquist, and J. M. Bell. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct. Ecol. 18:116-124.
53. Ornduff, R. 1969. Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon 18:121-133.
54. Owen, R. E., T. L. Whidden, and R. C. Plowright. 2010. Genetic and morphometric evidence for the conspecific status of the bumble bees, Bombus melanopygus and Bombus edwardsii. J. Insect Sci. 10:1-18.
55. Ritland, K., and F. R. Ganders. 1987. Covariation of selfing rates with parental gene fixation indexes within populations of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 41:760-771.
56. Ritland, C., and K. Ritland. 1989. Variation of sex allocation among 8 taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 76:1731-1739.
57. Robertson, A. W., A. Diaz, and M. R. MacNair. 1994. The quantitative genetics of floral characters in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 72:300-311.
58. Robertson, A. W., C. Mountjoy, B. E. Faulkner, M. V. Roberts, and M. R. Macnair. 1999. Flower choice by bumblebees collecting pollen from Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae): the effects of pollen quality and reward depletion. Ecology 80:2594-2606.
59. Schemske, D. W., and H. D. Bradshaw. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11910-11915.
60. Scoville, A., Y. W. Lee, J. H. Willis, and J. K. Kelly. 2009. Contribution of chromosomal polymorphisms to the G-matrix of Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 183:803-815.
61. Self, S. G., and K. Y. Liang 1987. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82:605-610.
62. Stebbins, G. L. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in higher plants. Am. Nat. 91:337-354.
63. Sweigart, A., K. Karoly, A. Jones, and J. H. Willis. 1999. The distribution of individual inbreeding coefficients and pairwise relatedness in a population of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 83:625-632.
64. Sweigart, A. L., and J. H. Willis. 2003. Patterns of nucleotide diversity are affected by mating system and asymmetric introgression in two species of Mimulus. Evolution 57:2490-2506.
65. Thorp, R. W., D. S. Horning, Jr., and L. L. Dunning. 1983. Bumble bees and cuckoo bumble bees of California. Bull. Cal. Insect Sur. 23:1-79.
66. USDA-ARS. 2006. U. S. National Pollinating Insects Database, United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory, Logan, Utah.
67. Uyenoyama, M. K., K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9:327-381.
68. van Kleunen, M., and K. Ritland. 2004. Predicting the evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population. J. Evol. Biol. 17:1389-1399.
69. Vickery, R. K. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol. Biol. 11:405-507.
70. Wang, J. 2011. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Mol. Ecol. Res. 11:141-145.
71. Willis, J. H. 1993. Partial self fertilization and inbreeding depression in two populations of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 71:145-154.
72. Willis, J. H. 1996. Measures of phenotypic selection are biased by partial inbreeding. Evolution 50:1501-1511.
73. Willis, J. H. 1999a. Inbreeding load, average dominance, and the mutation rate for mildly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 153:1885-1898.
74. Willis, J. H. 1999b. The role of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 53:1678-1691.
75. Wu, C. A., D. B. Lowry, A. M. Cooley, K. M. Wright, Y. W. Lee, and J. H. Willis. 2008. Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100:220-230.