Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential component of natural selection

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 277, Issue 1696, 2010, Pages 2945-2950

  Mojica, Julius P ^a   Kelly, John K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Flower size; Invisible fraction; Mimulus guttatus; Natural selection; Selection gradients

Indexed keywords

FECUNDITY; FIELDWORK; GENOTYPE; HERB; LIFE CYCLE; SEXUAL SELECTION; VIABILITY;

ANIMALIA; MIMULUS GUTTATUS;

EID: 77956920367     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0568     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Armbruster, W. S., Antonsen, L. & Pelabon, C. 2005 Pheno-typic selection on Dalechampia blossoms: honest signalling affects pollination success. Ecology 86, 3323-3333.
2. Basolo, A. L. 2008 Evolution of pleiotropic alleles for maturation and size as a consequence of predation. Biol. Lett. 4, 200-203. (doi:10.1098/rsbl. 2007.0638) (Pubitemid 351346304)
3. Bell, G. 1985 On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224, 223-265. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1985.0031)
4. Bennington, C. C. & McGraw, J. B. 1995 Phenotypic selection in an artificial population of Impatiens pallida: the importance of the invisible fraction. Evolution 49, 317-324. (doi:10.2307/2410342)
5. Blackenhorn, W. U. 2000 The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q. Rev. Biol. 75, 385-407.
6. Bonner, J. T. 1988 The evolution of complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Burrowes, P. A. 2000 Parental care and sexual selection in the Puerto Rican cave-dwelling frog, Eleutherodactylus cooki. Herpetologica 56, 375-386.
8. Charlesworth, B. & Hughes, K. A. 2000 The maintenance of genetic variation in life history traits. In Evolutionary genetics from molecules to morphology (eds R. S. Singh & C. B. Krimbas), pp. 369-392. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Childs, D. Z., Rees, M., Rose, K. E., Grubb, P. J. & Ellner, S. P. 2004 Evolution of size-dependent flowering in a variable environment: construction and analysis of a stochastic integral projection model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 425-434. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2597) (Pubitemid 38221922)
10. Cope, E. D. 1896 The primary factors of organic evolution. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
11. Curtsinger, J. W., Service, P. M. & Prout, T. 1994 Antagonistic pleiotropy, reversal of dominance, and genetic polymorphism. Am. Nat. 144, 210-228. (doi:10.1086/285671) (Pubitemid 2130635)
12. Delph, L. F., Gehring, J. L., Frey, F. M., Arntz, A. M. & Levri, M. 2004 Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58, 1936-1946. (doi:10.1111/j. 0014-3820.2004.tb00481.x)
13. Endler, J. A. 1986 Natural selection in the wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. 1996 Introduction to quantitative genetics. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
15. Fenster, C. B. & Ritland, K. 1994 Evidence for natural-selection on mating system in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 155, 588-596. (doi:10.1086/297197) (Pubitemid 2157602)
16. Fishman, L. & Willis, J. H. 2008 Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow mon-keyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 177, 802-810. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02265.x)
17. Grafen, A. 1988 On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. In Reproductive success (ed. T. H. Clutton-Brock), pp. 454-471. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Grether, G. F. 1996 Sexual selection and survival selection on wing coloration and body size in the rubyspot damsel-fly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50, 1939-1948. (doi:10.2307/2410752)
19. Hadfield, J. D. 2008 Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 723-734. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007. 1013) (Pubitemid 351198030)
20. Hall, M. C. & Willis, J. H. 2006 Divergent selection on flowering time contributes to local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus populations. Evolution 60, 2466-2477. (doi:10. 1554/05-688.1)
21. Hereford, J., Hansen, T. F. & Houle, D. 2004 Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution 58, 2133-2143. (doi:10.1554/04-147)
22. Hews, D. K. 1990 Examining hypotheses generated by field measures of sexual selection on male lizards, Uta palmeri. Evolution 44, 1956-1966. (doi:10.2307/2409606)
23. Kelly, J. K. 2003 Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 164, 1071-1085.
24. Kelly, J. K. 2008 Testing the rare-alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection. Genetica 132, 187-198. (doi:10.1007/s10709- 007-9163-4) (Pubitemid 350197758)
25. Kelly, J. K. & Willis, J. H. 2001 Deleterious mutations and genetic variation for flower size in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 55, 937-942. (doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055 [0937:DMAGVF]2.0.CO;2)
26. Kingsolver, J. & Pfennig, D. W. 2004 Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope's rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58, 1608-1612.
27. Kingsolver, J. G., Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S. N., Hill, C. E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001 The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157, 245-261. (doi:10. 1086/319193) (Pubitemid 32214660)
28. Lande, R. 1979 Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain-body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402-416. (doi:10.2307/2407630)
29. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210-1226. (doi:10.2307/2408842)
30. Lee, Y. H. 2009 Genetic analysis of standing variation for floral morphology and fitness components in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus (common monkeyflower). Durham, NC: Duke University.
31. Lehtila, K. & Brann, K. H. 2007 Correlated effects of selection for flower size in Raphanus raphanistrum. Can. J. Bot. Rev. Can. Bot. 85, 160-166. (doi:10.1139/B07-007) (Pubitemid 46917592)
32. Lendvai, G. & Levin, D. A. 2003 Rapid response to artificial selection on flower size in Phlox. Heredity 90, 336-342. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy. 6800249) (Pubitemid 36530808)
33. Martin, N. H. 2004 Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 777-782.
34. Medel, R., Botto-Mahan, C. & Kalin-Arroyo, M. 2003 Pollinator-mediated selection on the nectar guide phenotype in the Andean Monkey flower, Mimulus luteus. Ecology 84, 1721-1732.
35. Mitchell-Olds, T. & Shaw, R. G. 1987 Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41, 1149-1161. (doi:10.2307/ 2409084)
36. Murren, C. J., Chang, C. C. & Dudash, M. R. 2009 Patterns of selection of two North American native and nonnative populations of monkeyflower (Phrymaceae). New Phytol. 183, 691-701. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137. 2009.02928.x)
37. Preziosi, R. F. & Fairbairn, D. J. 1996 Sexual size dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: body size, components of body size and male mating success. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 317-336. (doi:10.1046/ j.1420-9101.1996.9030317.x)
38. Rauser, C. L., Tierney, J. J., Gunion, S. M., Covarrubias, G. M., Mueller, L. D. & Rose, M. R. 2006 Evolution of late-life fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 289-301. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2005.00966.x)
39. Rausher, M. D. 1992 The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to the environmental covari-ances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46, 616-626. (doi:10.2307/2409632)
40. Rausher, M. D. & Simms, E. L. 1989 The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. I. Attempts to detect selection. Evolution 43, 563-572. (doi:10.2307/ 2409059)
41. Sandring, S. & Agren, J. 2009 Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution 63, 1292-1300. (doi:10. 1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00624.x)
42. Schluter, D., Price, T. D. & Rowe, L. 1991 Conflicting selection pressures and life-history trade-offs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 246, 11-17. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1991.0118)
43. Sinervo, B. & McAdam, A. G. 2008 Maturation costs of reproduction due to clutch size and ontogenetic conflict as revealed in the invisible fraction. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 629-638. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1084) (Pubitemid 351198040)
44. Stanton, M. L., Snow, A. A. & Handel, S. N. 1986 Floral evolution-attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232, 1625-1627. (doi:10.1126/science.232. 4758.1625)
45. Stinchcombe, J. R., Rutter, M. T., Burdick, D. S., Tiffin, P., Rausher, M. D. & Mauricio, R. 2002 Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice. Am. Nat. 160, 511-523. (doi:10.1086/342069)
46. van Kleunen, M. & Burczyk, J. 2008 Selection on floral traits through male fertility in a natural plant population. Evol. Ecol. 22, 39-54.
47. van Kleunen, M. & Ritland, K. 2004 Predicting the evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 1389-1399. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00787.x) (Pubitemid 39471193)
48. Wade, M. J. & Kalisz, S. 1990 The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44, 1947-1955. (doi:10.2307/ 2409605)
49. Williams, P. D. & Day, T. 2003 Antagonistic pleiotropy, mortality source interactions, and the evolutionary theory of senescence. Evolution 57, 1478-1488.
50. Willis, J. H. 1996 Measures of phenotypic selection are biased by partial inbreeding. Evolution 50, 1501-1511. (doi:10.2307/2410887)
51. Worley, A. C. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2000 Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution 54, 1533-1545.
52. Wright, J. W. & Stanton, M. L. 2007 Collinsia sparsiflora in serpentine and nonserpentine habitats: using F2 hybrids to detect the potential role of selection in ecotypic diferen-tiation. New Phytol. 173, 354-366.