Inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus reduces visitation by bumble bee pollinators

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Carr, David E ^a   Roulston, T'ai H ^a   Hart, Haley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Southeastern High School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUMBLEBEE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOWER DEVELOPMENT; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; MIMULUS GUTTATUS; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT INSECT INTERACTION; POLLEN; POLLINATION; ANIMAL; BEE; DECISION MAKING; GENETICS; MIMULUS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY;

ANIMALS; BEES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; INBREEDING; MIMULUS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84904489250     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101463     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Darwin CR (1878) The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. London: John Murray. 487 p.
2. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237-268.
3. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 479-513. (Pubitemid 30065635)
4. Carr DE, Eubanks MD (2014) Interactions between insect herbivores and plant mating systems. Annu Rev Entomol 59: 185-203.
5. Ouborg NJ, Biere A, Muddle CL (2000) Inbreeding effects on resistance and transmission related traits in the Silene-Microbotryum pathosystem. Ecology 81: 520-531. (Pubitemid 30445988)
6. Carr DE, Murphy JF, Eubanks MD (2003) The susceptibility and response of inbred and outbred Mimulus guttatus to infection by Cucumber mosaic virus. Evol Ecol 17: 85-103. (Pubitemid 36326021)
7. Stephenson AG, Leyshon B, Travers SE, Hayes CN, Winsor JA (2004) Interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease on reproduction in wild gourd. Ecology: 85: 3023-3034. (Pubitemid 39548042)
8. Kelly JK, Arathi HS (2003) Inbreeding and the genetic variance in floral traits of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 90: 77-83. (Pubitemid 36251127)
9. Ivey CT, Carr DE (2005) Effects of herbivory and inbreeding on the pollinators and mating system of Mimulus guttatus (Phrymaceae). Am J Bot 92: 1641-1649. (Pubitemid 41426900)
10. Willis JH (1993) Partial self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in two populations of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity: 71: 145-154.
11. Dudash MR, Carr DE, Fenster CB (1997) Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution: 51: 54-65.
12. Willis JH (1999) Contribution of male-sterility mutations to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 83: 337-346.
13. Carr DE, Dudash MR (1995) Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus: consequences for potential male and female function. Heredity 75: 437-445. (Pubitemid 26469754)
14. Carr DE, Dudash MR (1997) The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51: 1797-1807.
15. Robertson AW, Mountjoy C, Faulkner BE, Roberts MV, Macnair MR (1999) Bumble bee selection of Mimulus guttatus flowers: The effects of pollen quality and reward depletion. Ecology 80: 2594-2606. (Pubitemid 30001007)
16. Levin DA (2013) Mating system shifts on the trailing edge. Ann Bot 109: 613-620.
17. Kiang YT (1972) Pollination study in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 26: 308-310
18. Vickery RK (1999) Remarkable waxing, waning, and wandering of population of Mimulus guttatus : an unexpected example of global warming. Great Basin Nat 59: 112-126.
19. Beardsley PM, Olmstead RG (2002) Redefining the Phrymaceae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae and Phryma. Am J Bot 89: 1093-1102. (Pubitemid 34805372)
20. Dole JA (1992) Reproductive assurance mechanisms in three taxa of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 79: 650-659.
21. Ritland K, Ritland C (1989) Variation in sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 76: 1731-1739.
22. Ritland K (1990) Inferences about inbreeding depression based on changes in the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 44: 1230-1241.
23. Dudash MR, Ritland K (1991) Multiple paternity and self-fertilization in relation to floral age in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 78: 1746-1753.
24. Macnair MR, Macnair VE, Martin BE (1989) Adaptive speciation in Mimulus: an ecological comparison of Mimulus cupriphilus with its presumed progenitor, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol 112: 269-279. (Pubitemid 20420822)
25. Arathi HS, Kelly JK (2004) Corolla morphology facilitates both autogamy and bumblebee pollination in Mimulus guttatus. Int J Plant Sci 165: 1039-1045. (Pubitemid 40162281)
26. Robertson AW, Macnair MR (1995) The effects of floral display size and pollinator service to individual flowers of Myosotis and Mimulus. Oikos 72: 106-114.
27. Plowright CMS, Cohen-Salmon D, Landry F, Simmonds V (1999) Foraging for nectar and pollen on thistle flowers (Cirsium vulgare) and artificial flowers: how do bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) respond to colony requirements? Behaviour 136: 951-963.
28. Church D, Plowright C, Loyer D (2001) Discriminations of color and pattern on artificial flowers by male and female bumble bees, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Great Lakes Entomol 34: 85-95. (Pubitemid 36646939)
29. Wiegmann DD, Wiegmann DA Waldron FA (2003) Effects of a reward downshift on the consummatory behaviour and flower choices of bumblebee foragers. Physiol Behav 79: 561-566. (Pubitemid 37087948)
30. Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (2004) Effect of a colour dimorphism on the flower constancy of honey bees and bumble bees. Can J Zool 82: 587-593. (Pubitemid 39059220)
31. Simmonds V, Plowright CMS (2004) How do bumblebees first find flowers? Unlearned approach response and habituation. Anim Behav 67: 379-386.
32. Chittka L (2002) Influence of intermittent rewards in learning to handle flowers in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus impatiens). Entomol General 26: 85-91.
33. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stoup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. Cary: SAS Institute Inc. 814 p.
34. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. Boulder: University Press of Colorado. 583 p.
35. Willson MF, Price PW (1977) The evolution of inflorescence size in Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution 31: 495-511. (Pubitemid 8258950)
36. Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, de Bruyn G-J (1989) Plant size and pollinator visitation in Cynoglossum officinale. Oikos 54: 201-204. (Pubitemid 19325935)
37. Galloway LF, Cirigliano T, Gremski K (2002) The contribution of display size and dichogamy to potential geitonogamy in Campanula americana. Int J Plant Sci 163: 133-139. (Pubitemid 34063164)
38. Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM (2004) The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct Ecol 18: 116-124. (Pubitemid 38241774)
39. Fenster CB, Carr DE (1997) Genetics of sex allocation in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). J Evol Biol 10: 641-661.
40. Arathi HS, Rasch A, Cox C, Kelly JK (2002) Autogamy and floral longevity in Mimulus guttatus. Int J Plant Sci 163: 567-573. (Pubitemid 34703356)
41. Yeamans RL (2011) Ecological and evolutionary shifts in pollen chemistry and their implications for pollinators. M.S. Thesis. University of Virginia.
42. Wise MJ, Vu JV, Carr DE (2011) Potential ecological constraints on the evolution of gynodioecy in Mimulus guttatus: relative fecundity and pollinator behaviour in a mixed-sex population. Int J Plant Sci 172: 199-210.
43. Roulston TH, Cane JH (2000) Pollen nutritional content and digestibility for animals. Plant Syst Evol 222 187-209. (Pubitemid 30457921)
44. Pernal SF, Currie RW (2002) Discrimination and preferences for pollen-based cues by foraging honeybees, Apis mellifera L. Anim Behav 63: 369-390.
45. Ashman T-L, Bradburn M, Cole DH, Blaney BH, Raguso RA (2005) The scent of a male: the role of floral volatiles in pollination of a gender dimorphic plant. Ecology 86: 2099-2105. (Pubitemid 41117480)
46. Dobson HEM, Bergstrom G (2000) The ecology and evolution of pollen odors. Plant Syst Evol 222: 63-87. (Pubitemid 30457915)
47. Rea JM, Vamosi JC (2013) Ultraviolet reflectance mediates pollinator visitation in Mimulus guttatus. Plant Species Biol 28: 177-184.
48. Byers KJRP, Bradshaw HD, Riffell JA (2013) Three floral volatiles contribute to differential pollinator attraction in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). J Exp Biol doi:10.1242/jeb.092213.
49. Kariyat RR, Mauck KE, De Moraes CM, Stephenson AG, Mescher MC (2012) Inbreeding alters volatile signaling phenotypes and influences tri-trophic interactions in horsenettle (Solanum carolinense L.). Ecol Lett 15: 301-309.
50. Kariyat RR, Mauck KE, Balogh CM, Stephenson AG, Mescher MC, et al. (2013) Inbreeding in horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) alters night-time volatile emissions that guide oviposition by Manduca sexta moths. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 280: doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0020.
51. Herlihy CR, Eckert CG (2004) Experimental dissection of inbreeding and its adaptive significance in a flowering plant, Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Evolution: 58: 2693-2703. (Pubitemid 40078417)
52. Karron JD, Mitchell RJ, Holmquist KG, Bell JM, Funk B (2004) The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 92: 242-248. (Pubitemid 38427308)
53. Uyenoyama MK, Holsinger KE, Waller DM (1993) Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 9: 327-381.
54. Kelly JK (2005) Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytol 165: 55-62.
55. Antonovics J (1992) Toward community genetics. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL, editors, Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 426-449.
56. Crustsinger GM, Collina MD, Fordyce JA, Gompert Z, Nice CC, et al. (2006) Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process. Science 313: 966-968. (Pubitemid 44267387)
57. Johnson MTJ, Lajeunesse M, Agrawal AA (2006) Additive and interactive effects of plant genotypic diversity on arthropod communities and plant fitness. Ecol Lett 9 24-34.
58. Whitham TG, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Bangert RK, et al. (2006) A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nat Rev Genet 7: 510-523. (Pubitemid 43943569)
59. Carr DE, Eubanks MD (2002) Inbreeding alters resistance to insect herbivory and host plant quality in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 56: 81-109.
60. Ivey CT, Carr DE, Eubanks MD (2004) Effects of inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus on tolerance to herbivory in natural environments. Ecology 85: 567-574. (Pubitemid 38319123)
61. Hayes CN, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (2004) Inbreeding influences herbivory in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae). Oecologia 140: 601-608. (Pubitemid 39219042)
62. Hull-Sanders HM, Eubanks MD (2005) Plant defense theory provides insight into interactions involving inbred plants and insect herbivores. Ecology 86: 897-904. (Pubitemid 40483374)
63. Bello-Bedoy R, Núñez-Farfán J (2011) The effect of inbreeding on defence against multiple enemies Datura stramonium. J Evol Biol 24: 518-530.
64. Leimu R, Kloss L, Fischer M (2012) Inbreeding alters activities of the stress-related enzymes chitanases and β-1,3-glucanases. PLoS One 7: 1-7.
65. Campbell SA, Thaler JS, Kessler A (2013) Plant chemistry underlies herbivore-mediated inbreeding depression in nature. Ecol Lett 16: 252-260.
66. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 644 p.
67. Bangert RK, Turek RJ, Martinsen GD, Wimp GM, Bailey JK, et al. (2005) Benefits of conservation of plant genetic diversity to arthropod diversity. Conserv Biol 19: 379-390. (Pubitemid 40452139)