Building a conceptual framework for data literacy

Teachers College Record

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1-22

  Gummer, Edith S ^a,b,c   Mandinach, Ellen B ^a  

^a WestEd   (United States)

^b NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c EWING MARION KAUFFMAN FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929413862     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aguerrebere, J. (2009). Panel discussion at Teachers' Use of Data to Impact Teaching and Learning conference, Alliance for Excellent Education, Washington, DC.
2. American Educational Research Association. (2000). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
5. Bettesworth, L. R., Alonzo, J., & Duesbery, L. (2008). Swimming in the depths: Educators' ongoing effective use of data to guide decision making. In T. J. Kowalski & T. J. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook on data-based decision making in education (pp. 286-303). New York, NY: Routledge.
6. CCSSO Task Force on Teacher Preparation and Entry Into the Profession. (2012). Our responsibility, our promise: Transforming teacher preparation and entry into the profession. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
7. Cibulka, J. (2013, August). Leveraging the InTASC standards and progressions. Presentation made during the webinar, Next Generation Standards & Accreditation Policies for Teacher Prep. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
8. Coburn, C. E., Toure, J., & Yamahita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making in the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115-1161.
9. Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993) Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28, 25-42.
10. Colyvas, J. A. (2012). Performance metrics as formal structures and through the lens of social mechanisms: When do they work and how do they influence? American Journal of Education, 112(2), 167-197.
11. Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., Nguyen, K. H., Mojica, G., & Myers, M. (2009). Equipartitioning/ splitting as a foundation of rational number reasoning using learning trajectories. Presentation at the conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Thessaloniki, Greece.
12. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013, August). CAEP accreditation standards. Washington, DC: Author.
13. Data Quality Campaign. (2014, February). Teacher data literacy: It's about time. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Dembosky, J. W., Pane, J. F., Barney, H., & Christina, R. (2006). Data driven decisionmaking in southwestern Pennsylvania school districts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
15. Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., & Garrison, M. (2013). Concerns, knowledge, and efficacy: An application of the teacher change model to data driven decision-making professional development. Creative Education, 4, 673-682.
16. Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W. J., & Garrison, M. (2013a). Becoming data driven: The influence of teachers' sense of efficacy on concerns related to data-driven decision making. Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 222-241.
17. Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W. J., & Garrison, M. (2013b). What teachers think about what they can do with data: Development and validation of data driven decision making efficacy and anxiety inventory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 87-98.
18. Ebby, C., Sirinides, P., Supovitz, J., & Oettinger. A. (2013, May). Teacher analysis of student knowledge TASK: A measure of learning-trajectory-oriented formative assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CAs.
19. Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1979). Measuring stages of concerns about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC Questionnaire. University of Texas, Austin.
20. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement, American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
21. Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers' mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11-30.
22. Honig, M. I., & Venkateswaran, N. (2012). School-central office relationships in evidence use: Understanding evidence use as a systems problem. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 199-222.
23. Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barrier to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258-1287.
24. Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 143-166.
25. Mandinach, E. B., Friedman, J. M., & Gummer, E. S. (2015). How can schools of education help to build educators' capacity to use data? A systemic view of the issue. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
26. Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2012). Navigating the landscape of data literacy: It IS complex. Washington, DC and Portland, OR: WestEd and Education Northwest.
27. Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). Defining data literacy: A report on a convening of experts. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 13(2), 6-28.
28. Messick, S. J. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
29. Messick, S. J. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
30. Mislevy, R. J., Behrens, J. T., Bennett, R. E., Demark, S. F., Frezzo, D. C., Levy, R., . . . Winters, F. I. (2010). On the roles of external knowledge representations in assessment design. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8(2). Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla
31. Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25, 6-20.
32. Mislevy, R. J., & Riconscente, M. (2005). Evidence-centered assessment design: Layers, structures, and terminology (Principled Assessment Designs for Inquiry Technical Report 9). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
33. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. A. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3-67.
34. Moss, P. A. (2012). Exploring the macro-micro dynamic in data use practice. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 223-232.
35. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
36. Schilling, S. G., Blunk, M., & Hill, H. C. (2007). Test validation and the MKT measures: Generalizations and conclusions. Measurement, 5(2-3), 118-128.
37. Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Epistemography and the participant structures of a professional practicum: A story behind the story of journalism 828 (WCER Working Paper No. 2005-8). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2005_8.pdf
38. Shaffer, D. W., Hatfield, D. Svarovsky, G. N., Nash, P., Nulty, A., Bagley, E., . . . Mislevy, R. J. (2007). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 33-53.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
40. Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 113-241.
41. Supovitz, J., Ebby, C. B., & Sirinides, P. (2013). Teacher analysis of student knowledge: A measure of learning trajectory-oriented formative assessment. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/1446_taskreport.pdf
42. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2009). Implementing data-informed decision making in schools: Teacher access, supports and use. Washington, DC: Author.
43. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2010). Teachers' ability to use data to inform instruction. Washington, DC: Author.