Kinetics of competitive adsorption between lysozyme and lactoferrin on silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the effect on lysozyme activity

Current Eye Research

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 622-631

  Hall, Brad ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a,b   Forrest, James A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competitive protein adsorption; Contact lens; Lysozyme activity; Protein deposition; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; AMINOBUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BALAFILCON A; BIOMATERIAL; DIMETICONE; IODINE 125; LACTOFERRIN; LOTRAFILCON B; LYSOZYME; MONOMER; N VINYL AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; N VINYL PYRROLIDONE; N,N DIMETHYLACRYLAMIDE; POLY(DIMETHYLSILOXYL) DI (SILYLBUTANOL) BIS(VINYL CARBAMATE); POLYMER; POVIDONE; POVIDONE DERIVATIVE; SENOFILCON A; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICONE; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; TRIMETHYL SILOXYSILANE; TRIS (TRI METHYLSILOXYSILYL) PROPYLVINYL CARBAMATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HYDROGEL; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BINDING COMPETITION; COMPETITIVE PROTEIN ADSORPTION; CONTACT LENS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GAMMA COUNTER; HYDROGEL; ISOTOPE LABELING; KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONTENT; SILICONE HYDROGEL CONTACT LENS; SOFT CONTACT LENS; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; METABOLISM;

ADSORPTION; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; LACTOFERRIN; MURAMIDASE; SILICONES;

EID: 84928640516     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: 14602202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2014.946518     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Janatova J. Activation and control of complement, inflammation, and infection associated with the use of biomedical polymers. ASAIO J 2000;46:S53-S62.
2. Nichols JJ. Contact lenses 2012. Contact Lens Spectr 2013; 28:24-29.
3. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40:897-903.
4. Mannucci LL, Moro F, Cosani A, Palumbo M. Conformational state of lacrimal proteins adsorbed on contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 1985;4:734-736.
5. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73: 16-21.
6. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-143.
7. Refojo MF, Holly FJ. Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: a possible cause of contact lens allergy. Contact Intraocular Lens Med J 1977;3:23-36.
8. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of Hema contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937-941.
9. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1996;22:53-59.
10. Elhers WH, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;8:445-449.
11. Hart DE, Schkolnick JA, Bernstein S, Wallach D, Gross DF. Contact lens induced giant papillary conjunctivitis: a retrospective study. J Am Optom Assoc 1989;60:195-204.
12. Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am Acad Ophthalmol 1977;83: 697-708.
13. Welle A. Competitive plasma protein adsorption on modified polymer surfaces monitored by quartz crystal microbalance technique. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2004;15: 357-370.
14. Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Jones LW, Chan J, Dalton K. Quartz crystal microbalance study of protein adsorption kinetics on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Colloid Interface Sci 2008;325:157-164.
15. Green RJ, Frazier RA, Shakesheff KM, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Tendler SJ. Surface plasmon resonance analysis of dynamic biological interactions with biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:1823-1835.
16. Green RJ, Davies J, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Tendler SJ. Surface plasmon resonance for real time in situ analysis of protein adsorption to polymer surfaces. Biomaterials 1997; 18:405-413.
17. Mora MF, Wehmeyer JL, Synowicki R, Garcia, CD. Investigating Protein Adsorption via Spectroscopic Ellipsometry. In: Puleo DA, Bizios R, editors. Biological Interactions on Materials Surfaces. Springer New York; 2009. pp. 19-41.
18. Spaeth K, Brecht A, Gauglitz G. Studies on the biotinavidin multilayer adsorption by spectroscopic ellipsometry. J Colloid Interface Sci 1997;196:128-135.
19. Cullen DC, Lowe CR. AFM studies of protein adsorption: 1. Time-resolved protein adsorption to highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. J Colloid Interface Sci 1994;166:102-108.
20. Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:71-82.
21. Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Kinetics of lysozyme activity recovered from conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2010;21: 343-358.
22. Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. I. Lens uptake of 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:119-124.
23. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Kliment CK, Lo J. Surface analysis of biomedical polymers by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infra-red. Biomaterials 1984;5:186-193.
24. Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Senchyna M, Jones L. A solid-phase assay for the quantitation of total protein eluted from balafilcon, lotrafilcon, and etafilcon contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2008;33:631-640.
25. Hall B, Jones L, Forrest JA. Measuring the kinetics and activity of adsorbed proteins: In vitro lysozyme deposited onto hydrogel contact lenses over short time periods. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2013;101A:755-764.
26. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Extraction efficiency of an extraction buffer used to quantify lysozyme deposition on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:169-173.
27. Zhao Z, Wei X, Aliwarga Y, Carnt NA, Garrett Q, Willcox MDP. Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2008;14:2016-2024.
28. Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Ngai V, Martin JW, Jones L, Medley J. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:1151-1164.
29. Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, Newell JO. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44-50.
30. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier M-A, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29: S75-S79; discussion S83-S84, S192-S194.
31. Zhang S, Borazjani RN, Salamone JC, Ahearn DG, Crow Jr SA, Pierce GE. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: Effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2005;28: 113-119.
32. Deng XM, Castillo EJ, Anderson JM. Surface modification of soft contact lenses: Silanization, wettability and lysozyme adsorption studies. Biomaterials 1986;7:247-251.
33. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787-796.
34. Morsky P. Turbidimetric determination of lysozyme with Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells: reexamination of reaction conditions. Anal Biochem 1983;128:77-85.
35. Vantrappen G, Ghoos AY, Peeters T. The inhibition of lysozyme by bile acids. Am J Dig Dis 1976;21:547-552.
36. Ito Y, Yamada H, Nakamura S, Imoto T. Purification, amino acid sequence, and some properties of rabbit kidney lysozyme. J Biochem 1990;107:236-241.
37. Green-Church KB, Nichols JJ. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008;14:291-297.
38. Leitch EC, Willcox MD. Synergic antistaphylococcal properties of lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Med Microbiol 1998;47:837-842.
39. Leitch EC, Willcox MD. Lactoferrin increases the susceptibility of S. epidermidis biofilms to lysozyme and vancomycin. Curr Eye Res 1999;19:12-19.
40. Ellison RT, Giehl TJ. Killing of gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Clin Invest 1991;88:1080-1091.
41. Ceska M, Sjodin AV, Grossmuller F. Some quantitative aspects of the labelling of proteins with 125I by the iodine monochloride method. Biochem J 1971;121:139-143.
42. Weathersby PK, Horbett TA, Hoffman AS. A new method for analysis of the adsorbed plasma protein layer on biomaterial surfaces. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976;22:242-252.
43. Messina GML, Satriano C, Marletta G. A multitechnique study of preferential protein adsorption on hydrophobic and hydrophilic plasma-modified polymer surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2009;70:76-83.
44. Morrissey BW, Fenstermaker CA. Conformation of adsorbed gamma-globulin and beta-lactoglobulin. Effect of surface concentration. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976;22:278-284.
45. Fullard RJ, Snyder C. Protein levels in nonstimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:1119-1126.
46. Carney FP, Morris CA, Milthorpe B, Flanagan JL, Willcox MDP. In vitro adsorption of tear proteins to hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2009;35:320-328.
47. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-373.
48. Ng A, Heynen M, Luensmann D, Jones L. Impact of tear film components on lysozyme deposition to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:392-400.
49. Jadi S, Heynen M, Luensmann D, Jones L. Composition of incubation solution impacts in vitro protein uptake to silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2012;18: 337-347.
50. Subbaraman LN, Glasier M-A, Varikooty J, Srinivasan S, Jones L. Protein deposition and clinical symptoms in daily wear of etafilcon lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89: 1450-1459.
51. Williams TJ, Schneider RP, Willcox MDP. The effect of protein-coated contact lenses on the adhesion and viability of gram negative bacteria. Curr Eye Res 2003;27:227-235.
52. Subbaraman L, Borazjani R, Zhu H, Zhao Z, Jones L, Willcox MDP. Influence of protein deposition on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:959-966.
53. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, et al. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:183-188.
54. Sariri R, Tighe B. Effect of surface chemistry on protein interaction with hydrogel contact lenses. Iran Polym J 1996; 5:259-266.
55. Luensmann D, Zhang F, Subbaraman L, Sheardown H, Jones L. Localization of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res 2009;34:683-697.
56. Luensmann D, Glasier M-AA, Zhang F, Bantseev V, Simpson T, Jones L. Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84: 839-847.