In vitro adsorption of tear proteins to hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based contact lens materials

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 320-328

  Carney, Fiona P ^a,b   Morris, Carol A ^a,c   Milthorpe, Bruce ^a,d   Flanagan, Judith L ^e   Willcox, Mark D P ^a,e  

^a VISION COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

^b BioCure Inc   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Albumin; Contact lenses; Lactoferrin; Lysozyme; Mucin; Protein adsorption

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; IODINE 125; LACTOFERRIN; LYSOZYME; MUCIN; TEAR PROTEIN;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BINDING ASSAY; CONTACT LENS; DESORPTION; IODINATION; ISOTOPE LABELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DETERMINATION;

ADSORPTION; ALBUMINS; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; EYE PROTEINS; HUMANS; LACTOFERRIN; METHACRYLATES; MUCINS; MURAMIDASE; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 74249089159     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181becd3c     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Ngai V, et al. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:1151-1164.
2. Hamano H. The change of precorneal tear film by the application of contact lenses. Contact Intraocul Lens Med J 1981;7:205-209.
3. Holly FJ. Tear film physiology and contact lens wear. II. Contact lens-tear film interaction. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981;58:331-341.
4. Tomlinson A. Contact lens-induced dry eye. In: Tomlinson A, ed. Complications of Contact Lens Wear. St Louis, MO, Mosby, 1992, pp 195-218.
5. Starcher B. A ninhydrin-based assay to quantitate the total protein content of tissue samples. Anal Biochem 2001;292:125-129.
6. Scott G, Mowrey-McKee M. Dimerization of tear lysozyme on hydrophilic contact lens polymers. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:461-466.
7. Jones L. Disposable contact lenses: A review. J Br Contact Lens Soc 1993;17:9.
8. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S, et al. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses. I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:865-872.
9. Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, et al. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44-50.
10. Stahl U, Willcox MD, Naduvilath T, et al. Influence of tear film and contact lens osmolality on ocular comfort in contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:857-867.
11. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. IV. Comparison of in vivo spoilage with the in vitro adsorption of tear proteins. Biomaterials 1986;7:89-96.
12. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I. Conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterials 1984;5:319-325.
13. Leahy CD, Mandell RB, Lin ST. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:504-511.
14. Minnarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophyllic contact lenses: Effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;17:8.
15. Tripathi R, Tripathi B, Millard C. Physiochemical changes in contact lenses and their interactions with the cornea and tears: A review and personal observations. CLAO J 1988;14:11.
16. Subbaraman LN, Woods J, Teichroeb JH, et al. Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86: 244-250.
17. Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, et al. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:71-82.
18. Nichols JJ. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:751-757.
19. Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Jones LW, et al. Quartz crystal microbalance study of protein adsorption kinetics on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Colloid Interface Sci 2008;325:157-164.
20. Garrett Q, Milthorpe BK. Human serum albumin adsorption on hydrogel contact lenses in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:2594-2602.
21. Korb D. Tear film-contact lens interactions. In: Sullivan D, ed. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes. New York, NY, Plenum Press, 1994, pp 403-410.
22. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, et al. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-849.
23. Carney FP, Morris CA, Willcox MD. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on the major tear proteins during extended wear. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997;25 (suppl 1):S36-S38.
24. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:503-510.
25. Tripathi PC, Tripathi RC. Analysis of glycoprotein deposits on disposable soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:121-125.
26. Brennan N, Coles M. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 2002;27:75-100.
27. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986;7:9-16.
28. Markwell MA. A new solid-state reagent to iodinate proteins. I. Conditions for the efficient labeling of antiserum. Anal Biochem 1982;125:427-432.
29. Antonsen KP, Bohnert JL, Nabeshima Y, et al. Controlled release of proteins from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate copolymer gels. Biomater Artif Cells Immobilization Biotechnol 1993;21:1-22.
30. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al. Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1985;6:338-345.
31. Garrett Q, Griesser HJ, Milthorpe BK, et al. Irreversible adsorption of human serum albumin to hydrogel contact lenses: A study using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Biomaterials 1999;20:1345-1356.
32. Lundström I, Elwing H. Simple kinetic models for protein exchange reactions on solid surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 1990;136:68-84.
33. Lee WK, McGuire J, Bothwell MK. A mechanistic approach to modeling single protein adsorption at solid-water interfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 1999;213:265-267.
34. Carter DC, Ho JX. Structure of serum albumin. Adv Protein Chem 1994; 45:153-203.
35. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, et al. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-373.
36. Gudmundsson OG, Woodward DF, Fowler SA, et al. Identification of proteins in contact lens surface deposits by immunofluorescence microscopy. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:196-197.
37. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: Effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-188.
38. Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ, Ruben M. The pathology of soft contact lens spoilage. Ophthalmology 1980;87:365-380.
39. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-3224.
40. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65: 937-941.
41. Blake CC, Koenig DF, Mair GA, et al. Structure of hen egg-white lysozyme. A three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 2 Angstrom resolution. Nature 1965;206:757-761.
42. Blake CC, Swan ID. X-ray analysis of structure of human lysozyme at 6 A resolution. Nat New Biol 1971;232:12-15.
43. Halper JP, Latovitzki N, Bernstein H, et al. Optical activity of human lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1971;68:517-522.
44. Ikeda K, Hamaguchi K, Miwa S, et al. Circular dichroism of human lysozyme. J Biochem 1972;71:371-378.
45. Deng XM, Castillo EJ, Anderson JM. Surface modification of soft contact lenses: Silanization, wettability and lysozyme adsorption studies. Biomaterials 1986;7:247-251.
46. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29: S75-S79; discussion S83-S74, S192-S194.
47. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, et al. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:25-36. (Pubitemid 38161171)
48. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, et al. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:143-151.
49. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, et al. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:209-214.
50. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-143.
51. Gibbons RJ, Moreno EC, Spinell DM. Model delineating the effects of a salivary pellicle on the adsorption of Streptococcus miteor onto hydroxyapatite. Infect Immun 1976;14:1109-1112.
52. Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. I. Lens uptake of 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:119-124.
53. Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1687-1695.
54. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Sheardown H, et al. Efficacy of an extraction solvent used to quantify albumin deposition on hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2009;35:76-80.
55. Proust JE, Baszkin A, Boissonnade MM. Adsorption of bovine submaxillary mucin on surface-oxidized polyethylene films. J Colloid Interface Sci 1983;94:421-429.
56. Lord MS, Stenzel MH, Simmons A, et al. The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2006;27: 567-575.
57. Soderquist ME, Walton AG. Structural changes in proteins adsrobed on polymer surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 1980;75:386-397.
58. Turbill P, Beugeling T, Poot AA. Proteins involved in the Vroman effect during exposure of human blood plasma to glass and polyethylene. Biomaterials 1996;17:1279-1287.
59. Sariri R, Sabbaghzadeh R. Competitive adsorption of proteins on hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J 2001;27:159-162.
60. Baines MG, Cai F, Backman HA. Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:807-810.
61. Regoeczi E. Iodine-Labeled Plasma Proteins. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1984.
62. Petrash S, Sheller NB, Dando W, et al. Variation in tenacity of protein adsorption in self-assembled monolayer order as observed by X-ray reflectivity. Langmuir 1997;13:1881-1883.
63. Riccitelli SD, Schlatterer RG, Hendrix JA, et al. Albumin coatings resistant to shear-induced desorption. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1985;31: 250-256.
64. Taylor RL, Willcox MD, Williams TJ, et al. Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75: 23-29.
65. Willcox MD, Harmis N, Cowell, et al. Bacterial interactions with contact lenses; effects of lens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. Biomaterials 2001;22:3235-3247.
66. Aristoteli LP, Willcox MD. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ocular isolates to mucin. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;29:143-146.
67. Williams TJ, Schneider RP, Willcox MD. The effect of protein-coated contact lenses on the adhesion and viability of gram negative bacteria. Curr Eye Res 2003;27:227-235.