The multiple roles of international courts and tribunals: Enforcement, dispute settlement, constitutional and administrative review

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 345-370

  Alter, Karen J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928267869     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139107310.018     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Alter, Karen J. (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
2. (2008a). “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context, ”European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33–63.
3. (2008b). “Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation, ” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 37–76.
4. (2009). The European Court’s Political Power: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
5. (2011a). “The Evolving International Judiciary, ” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 7, pp. 387–415.
6. (2011b). “Tipping the Balance: International Courts and the Construction of International and Domestic Politics, ” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Vol. 13, pp. 1–22.
7. (2012). “The Global Spread of European Style International Courts, ” West European Politics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 135–54.
8. (forthcoming). The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
9. Benvenisti, Eyal (2008). “Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 241–76.
10. Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope (2010). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
11. Carrubba, Clifford J., Matthew Gabel, and Charles Hankla (2008). “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice, ” American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 435–52.
12. Cooley, Alexander, and Hendrik Spruyt (2009). Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
13. Duffy, Helen (2009). “Hadijatou Mani Koroua v. Niger: Slavery Unveiled by the Ecowas Court, ” Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 151–70.
14. Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Joel P. Trachtman (2009) (eds.). Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
15. Elster, Jon (2000). Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
16. Epp, Charles R. (1998). The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
17. Franck, Susan D. (2007). “Empirically Evaluating Claims about Investment Treaty Arbitration, ” North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 1–87.
18. Garrett, Geoffrey, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Heiner Schulz (1998). “The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union, ” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 149–76.
19. Garrett, Geoffrey, and Barry R. Weingast (1993). “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market, ” in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas & Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 173–206.
20. Ginsburg, Tom (2005). “Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, ” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 631–73.
21. Goldsmith, Jack L., and Eric A. Posner (2005). The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
22. Goldsmith, Jack, and Daryl Levinson (2009). “Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law, ” Harvard Law Review, Vol. 122, No. 7, pp. 1791–868.
23. Goldstein, Judith (1996). “International Law and Domestic Institutions: Reconciling North American ‘Unfair’ Trade Laws, ” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 541–64.
24. Goodman, Ryan, and Derek Jinks (2004). “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law, ” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 621–703.
25. Hathaway, Oona, and Scott J. Shapiro (2011). “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law, ” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 252–349.
26. Hawkins, Darren, Daniel Nielson, Michael J. Tierney, and David A. Lake (2006) (eds.). Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
27. Helfer, Laurence R., and Karen J. Alter (2009). “The Andean Tribunal of Justice and Its Interlocutors: Understanding Preliminary Reference Patterns in the Andean Community, ” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 871–930.
28. Helfer, Laurence R., Karen J. Alter, and M. Florencia Guerzovich (2009). “Islands of Effective International Adjudication: Constructing an Intellectual Property Rule of Law in the Andean Community, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 1 – 47.
29. Helfer, Laurence R., and Anne-Marie Slaughter (1997). “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication, ” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 273–391.
30. (2005). “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo, ” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 899–956.
31. Ikenberry, G. John (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
32. Kelemen, R. Daniel (2011). Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
33. Keohane, Robert O., Andrew Moravcsik, and Anne-Marie Slaughter (2000). “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational, ” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 457–88.
34. Levi, Werner (1976). Law and Politics in the International Society (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).
35. Maduro, Miguel Poiares (2009). “Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman (eds.), Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 356–80.
36. Martin, Lisa L. (2013). “Against Compliance, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 591–610.
37. McCubbins, Matthew D., Roger G. Noll, and Barry R. Weingast (1989). “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies, ” Virginia Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 431–82.
38. Moravcsik, Andrew (1995). “Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe, ” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 157–89.
39. Phelan, William (2008). “Why Do EU Member States Offer a ‘Constitutional’ Obedience to EU Obligations? Encompassing Domestic Institutions and Costly International Obligations, ” Discussion Paper No. 256 (Dublin: Trinity College Dublin, Institute for International Integration Studies).
40. Posner, Eric A., and John C. Yoo (2005). “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, ” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 1–74.
41. Raustiala, Kal (2000). “Compliance & Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation, ” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 387–440.
42. Romano, Cesare P. R. (2007). “The Shift from the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent, ” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 791–872.
43. (2011). “A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions, ” Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 241–77.
44. Staton, Jeffrey K., and Will H. Moore (2011). “Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics, ” International Organization, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 553–87.
45. Steinberg, Richard H. (2002). “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, ” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 339–74.
46. (2004). “Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 247–75.
47. Stephan, Paul B. (2002). “Courts, Tribunals, and Legal Unification-the Agency Problem, ” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 333–52.
48. Stone Sweet, Alec (1999). “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance, ” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 147–84.
49. (2000). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
50. (2002). “Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy, ” West European Politics, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 77–100.
51. von Stein, Jana (2013). “The Engines of Compliance, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 477–501.