International law and domestic institutions: Reconciling North American "unfair" trade laws

International Organization

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 541-564

  Goldstein, Judith ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030487834     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818300033506     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Anderson, Keith B. 1993. Antidumping laws in the United States. Journal of World Trade 27(2): 99-117.
2. Barton, John, and Barry Carte. 1993. International law and institutions for a new age. Georgetown Law Journal 81:535-62.
3. Cameron, David. 1988. The Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement, Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. Unpublished.
4. Cameron, Duncan, Stephen Clarkson, and Mel Watkins. 1988. Market access, in The free trade deal, edited by Duncan Cameron. Toronto:Lorimer.
5. Cannon, James, Jr. 1991. Binational panel dispute settlement under Article 1904 of the United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement: A procedural comparison with the United States Court of International Trade. Law and Policy in International Business 22:689-719.
6. Destler, I. M., John Odell, with Kimberly Ann Elliott. 1987. Anti-protectionism: Changing forces in United States trade politics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
7. Doern, G. Bruce, and Brian Tomlin. 1991. Faith and fear. Toronto: Stoddart.
8. Evans, Peter, Harold Jacobson, and Robert Plutnam, eds. 1995. Double-edged diplomacy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, interests, and American trade policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
10. _. 1995. Judicial review and American trade policy, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. Unpublished.
11. Goldstein, Judith, and Stephanie Lenway. 1989. Interests or institutions: An inquiry into congressional-ITC relations. International Studies Quarterly 33:303-27.
12. Graham, William. 1988. The role of the Commission in the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement: A Canadian perspective, in United States/Canada Free Trade Agreement: The economic and legal implications. Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association.
13. Hart, Michael A. 1994. Decision at midnight. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
14. Hudec, Robert. 1987. Dispute resolution under a North American free trade area: The importance of domestic legal setting. Canada-U.S. Law Journal 12:329-36.
15. Jackson, John. 1979a. Governmental disputes in international trade relations: A proposal in the context of GATT. Journal of World Trade Law 13:1-21.
16. _. 1979b. Introduction: Perspectives on antidumping law and policy. In Antidumping law: Policy and implementation, vol. 1 of Michigan yearbook of international legal studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17. Keohane, Robert. 1984. After hegemony. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
18. Keohane, Robert, and Joseph Nye. 1977. Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little Brown.
19. Krasner, Stephen. 1993. Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics 45:336-66.
20. Lowenfeld, Andreas. 1994. Remedies along with rights: Institutional reform in the new GATT. American Journal of International Law 88:477-88.
21. Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1992. Economics, organization, and management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
22. Odell, John. 1985. The outcomes of international trade conflicts: The U.S. and South Korea, 1960-1981. International Studies Quarterly 29:263-86.
23. Pastor, Robert. 1980. Congress and the politics of U.S. foreign economic policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42:427-60.
25. Schott, Jeffrey J. 1988. The Free Trade Agreement: A U.S. assessment. In The Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement: The global impact, edited by Jeffrey Schott and Murray Smith. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
26. United States-Canada Free Trade Implementation Act of 1988 (FTA). U.S. Public Law 100-449, 28 September 1988.
27. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1995. U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement: Factors contributing to controversy in appeals of trade remedy cases to binational panels. Briefing report to congressional requesters. Doc. no. GGD-95-175BR, June.
28. U.S. House. 1988. Committee on Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts. Hearings on the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement. 102d Cong., 2d session, April 18.
29. U.S. Tariff Commission. 1919. Information concerning dumping and unfair foreign competition in the U.S. and Canada's antidumping law. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
30. Winham, Gilbert. 1986. International trade and the Tokyo Round negotiation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.