The evolving international judiciary

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 7, Issue , 2011, Pages 387-415

  Alter, Karen J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

International courts; international law

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155159967     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105535     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adebajo A, Rashid IOD. 2004. West Africas Security Challenges: Building Peace in a Troubled Region. Boulder, CO/London: Lynne Rienner
2. Allain J. 2000. A Century of International Adjudication: The Rule of Law and its Limits. The Hague: TMC Asser
3. Alter KJ. 1998. Who are the masters of the treaty? European governments and the European Court of Justice. Int. Organ. 52(1): 125-52
4. Alter KJ. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
5. Alter KJ. 2003. Resolving or exacerbating disputes? The WTOs new dispute resolution system. Int. Aff. 79(4): 783-800
6. Alter KJ. 2008. Delegating to international courts: self-binding versus other-binding delegation. Law Contemp. Probl. 71: 37-76
7. Alter KJ. 2009. The European Courts Political Power: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
8. Alter KJ. 2010. The new international courts: a birds eye view. BCICS Work. Pap. No. 09-001
9. Alter KJ. 2011. The global spread of European style international courts. West European Politics. 44(6): In press
10. Alter KJ, Helfer L, Saldias O. 2011. Transplanting the European Court of Justice: the founding of the Andean Tribunal of Justice. OnatiWork. Pap. Ser.
11. Alter KJ, Meunier S. 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspect. Polit. 7(1): 13-24
12. Barton JH, Goldstein JH, Josling TE, Steinberg RH. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
13. Bass GJ. 2000. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniv. Press
14. Bates E. 2011. The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
15. Boerger-De Smedt A. 2008. La court de justice dans les négociationis du traité de Paris instituant la ceca. J. Eur. Hist. 14(2): 7-34
16. Börzel T. 2001. Non-compliance in the European Union: pathology or statistical artifact. J. Eur. Public Policy 8(5): 803-24
17. Burley A-M. 1989. The Alien Tort Statute and the Judiciary Act of 1789: A badge of honor. Am. J. Int. Law 83: 461-93
18. Burley A-M, Mattli W. 1993. Europe before the court. Int. Organ. 47(1): 41-76
19. Cavallaro JL, Brewer SE. 2008. Reevaluating regional human rights litigation in the twenty-first century: the case of the Inter-American Court. Am. J. Int. Law 102(4): 768-827
20. Cohen A. 2007. Constitutionalism without constitution. Transnational elites between political mobilization and legal expertise (1940s-1960s). Law Soc. Inq. 23(1): 109-36
21. Danilenko GM. 1999. The Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States. N.Y. Univ. J. Int. Law Polit. 31: 893-918
22. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2002. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Mich. Press
23. Dunoff J. 2009. Does the United States support international tribunals? The case of the multilateral trade system. In The Sword and the Scales: The United States and International Courts and Tribunals, ed. C Romano. pp. 322-94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
24. Ebobrah ST. 2010. Human rights developments in African sub-regional economic communities during 2009. Afr. Hum. Rights J. 10(233): 233-67
25. Friedrich CJ. 1954. Introduction: the background of these studies and the development of the draft constitution. In Studies in Federalism, ed. R Bowie, C Friedrich, pp. xxv-xlii. Boston: Little Brown
26. Gathii J. 2010. The under-appreciated jurisprudence of Africas regonal trade judiciaries. Oreg. Rev. Int. Law 12(2): 245-83
27. Gillingham J. 1991. Coal, Steel, and the Rebirth of Europe, 1945-1955: The Germans and French from Ruhr Conflict to Economic Community. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
28. Greer S. 2006. The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
29. Guzman AT. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
30. Haas E. 1970. The study of regional integration. Int. Organ. (Autumn)
31. Haas E. 1975. The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
32. Hagan J. 2003. Justice in the Balkins: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
33. Hagan J, Levi R, Feralles G. 2006. Swaying the hand of justice: the internal and external dynamics of regime change at the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Law Soc. Inq. 31(3): 585-616 (Pubitemid 44290195)
34. Hanson B. 1998. What happened to fortress Europe? External trade policy liberalization in the European Union. Int. Organ. 52(1): 32
35. Harlow C, Rawlings R. 1992. Pressure Through Law. London: Routledge
36. Helfer L, Alter K, Guerzovich MF. 2009. Islands of effective international adjudication: constructing an intellectual property rule of law in the Andean community. Am. J. Int. Law 103: 1-47
37. Helfer LR. 2008. Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: embeddedness as a deep structural principle of the European human rights regime. Eur. J. Int. Law 19(1): 125-59
38. Helfer LR, Alter KJ. 2009. The Andean Tribunal of Justice and its interlocutors: understanding the preliminary ruling reference patterns in the Andean community. J. Int. Law Polit. 42(4): 871-928
39. Helfer LR, Slaughter A-M. 1997. Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication. Yale Law J. 107(2): 273-391
40. Helfer LR, Slaughter A-M. 2005. Why states create international tribunals: a response to professors Posner and Yoo. Calif. Law Rev. 93(May): 899-956
41. Hoffmann S. 1966. Obstinate or obsolete? France, European integration, and the fate of the nation-state. Daedalus 95(3): 862-915
42. Hudec RE. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, NH: Butterworth
43. Kagan R. 2002. Power and weakness. Policy Rev. 113
44. Karpik L, Halliday TC. 2011. The legal complex. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 7: 217-36
45. Keohane R, Moravcsik A, Slaughter A-M. 2000. Legalized dispute resolution: interstate and transnational. Int. Organ. 54(3): 457-88
46. Keohane RO, Victor DG. 2011. The regime complex for climate change. Perspect. Polit. 9(1): 7-23
47. Kingsbury B. 2012. International courts: uneven judicialization. In Cambridge Companion to International Law, ed. J Crawford, M Koskenniemi. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
48. Kull S, Ramsay C. 2009. American public opinion on international courts and tribunals. In The Sword and the Scales: The United States and International Courts and Tribunals, ed. C Romano, pp. 12-29. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
49. Madsen MR. 2009. Legal diplomacy: law politics and the genesis of postwar European human rights. In Human Rights in the Twentieth Century: A Critical History, ed. S-L Hoffmann, pp. 62-84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
50. Madsen MR, Vauchez A. 2005. European constitutionalism at the cradle. Law and lawyers in the construction of a European political order (1920-1960). In In Lawyers Circles. Lawyers and European Legal Integration, ed. A Jettinghoff, H Schepel, pp. 15-34. The Hague: Elzevir Reed
51. Mansfield E, Reinhardt E. 2003. Multilateral determinants of regionalism: the effects of GATT/WTO on the formation of preferential trading arrangements. Int. Organ. 57(3): 829-62 (Pubitemid 37524677)
52. Mattli W. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
53. Milward A. 1992. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge
54. Moravcsik A. 1995. Explaining international human rights regimes: liberal theory andWestern Europe. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 1(2): 157-89
55. Moravcsik A. 2000. The origins of human rights regimes: democratic delegation in postwar Europe. Int. Organ. 54(2): 217-52
56. Moravcsik A. 2005. The paradox of US human rights policy. In American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, ed. M Ignatieff, p. 19. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
57. Mouloul A. 2009. Understanding the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Laws in Africa (OHADA). http://www.ohada.com
58. Noland M. 1997. Chasing phantoms: the political economy of USTR. Int. Organ. 51(3): 365-87 (Pubitemid 127342626)
59. Nwogu N. 2007. Regional integration as an instrument of human rights: reconceptualizing ECOWAS. J. Hum. Rights 6: 345-60
60. Nye JS. 1971. Comparing common markets: a revised neofunctionalist model. Int. Organ. 24(4): 796-835
61. Posner EA, Yoo JC. 2005. A theory of international adjudication. Calif. Law Rev. 93(1): 1-72
62. Rasmussen M. 2010. From Costa v. ENEL to the Treaties of Rome: a brief history of legal revolution. In The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty, ed. MP Maduro, L Azoulai. Portland, OR: Hart
63. Robertson AH, Merrills JG. 1994. Human Rights in Europe. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press
64. Romano C. 2009. The Sword and the Scales: The United States and International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
65. Romano C. 2011. A taxonomy of international rule of law institutions. J. Int. Dispute Settl. 2: 241-77
66. Ruggie J. 1983. International regimes, transactions and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. In International Regimes, ed. S Krasner, pp. 195-232. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
67. Sacriste G, Vauchez A. 2007. The force of international law: lawyers diplomacy on the international scene in the 1920s. Law Soc. Inq. 32(1): 83-107
68. Savelsberg JJ, King RD. 2007. Law and collective memory. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3: 189-211
69. Schabas WA. 2001. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
70. Schermers HG. 1999. Acceptance of international supervision of human rights. Leiden J. Int. Law 12: 821-31
71. Shaffer GC. 2003. Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation.Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
72. Shaffer GC, Sanchez Badin MR, Rosenberg B. 2008. The trials of winning at the WTO: What lies behind Brazils success? Cornell Int. Law J. 41(2): 383-502
73. Shklar J. 1964. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
74. Sikkink K. 2004. Mixed Signals. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
75. Sikkink K, Lutz E. 2001. The justice cascade: the evolution and impact of foreign human rights trials in Latin America. Chicago J. Int. Law 2: 1-33
76. Slaughter A-M. 1995. International law in a world of liberal states. Eur. J. Int. Law (6): 503-38 (Pubitemid 126019456)
77. Stein E. 1981. Lawyers, judges and the making of a transnational constitution. Am. J. Int. Law 75(1): 1-27
78. Stone Sweet A. 1999. Judicialization and the construction of governance. Comp. Polit. Stud. 32(2): 147-84
79. Tallberg J. 2003. EuropeanGovernance and Supranational Institutions: Making States Comply. London: Routledge
80. Vauchez A. 2010. The transnational politics of judicialization: Van Gend en Loos and the making of EU polity. Eur. Law J. 16(1): 1-28
81. Weiler J. 1991. The transformation of Europe. Yale Law J. 100: 2403-83
82. Weiler J. 2000. The rule of lawyers and the ethos of diplomats: reflections on the internal and external legitimacy of WTO dispute settlement. Jean Monet Work. Pap. Ser. WP 09/00