Evaluating the Effects of Scripted Distributed Pair Programming on Student Performance and Participation

IEEE Transactions on Education

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 24-31

  Tsompanoudi, Despina ^a   Satratzemi, Maya ^a   Xinogalos, Stelios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Adaptive collaboration support; collaboration scripts; collaborative programming; distributed pair programming (DPP)

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; TEACHING;

COMPUTER SCIENCE COURSE; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; LEARNING OUTCOME; PROGRAMMING ACTIVITIES; PROGRAMMING ASSIGNMENTS; PROGRAMMING TASKS; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; TEACHING METHODS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84928255030     PISSN: 00189359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TE.2015.2419192     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. C. McDowell, B. Hanks, and L. Werner, "Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom," ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 35, no. 3, p. 60, Sep. 2003.
2. E. Mendes, L. Al Fakhri, and A. Luxton-Reilly, "A replicated experiment of pair-programming in a 2nd year software development and design computer science course," ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 108-112, 2006.
3. N. Nagappan, L. Williams, M. Ferzli, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, C. Miller, and S. Balik, "Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming," ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 359-362, 2003.
4. B. Hanks, "Empirical evaluation of distributed pair programming," Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 530-544, Jul. 2008.
5. D. Stotts, L. Williams, N. Nagappan, P. Baheti, D. Jen, and A. Jackson, "Virtual teaming: Experiments and experiences with distributed pair programming," Extreme Programming and Agile Methods-XP/Agile Universe pp. 129-141, 2003.
6. D. Tsompanoudi and M. Satratzemi, "Enhancing adaptivity and intelligent tutoring in distributed pair programming systems to support novice programmers," in Proc. CSEDU'2011, pp. 339-344.
7. C. Ho, S. Raha, E. Gehringer, and L. Williams, "Sangam-A distributed pair programming plug-in for eclipse," in Proc. OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology Exchange, 2004, pp. 73-77.
8. K. E. Boyer, A. A. Dwight, R. T. Fondren, M. A. Vouk, and J. C. Lester, "A development environment for distributed synchronous collaborative programming," ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 40, no. 3, p. 158, 2008.
9. T. Schümmer and S. Lukosch, "Understanding tools and practices for distributed pair programming," J. Universal Computer Sci., vol. 15, no. 16, pp. 3101-3125, 2009.
10. D. Tsompanoudi, M. Satratzemi, and S. Xinogalos, "Exploring the effects of collaboration scripts embedded in a distributed pair programming system," in Proc. ITiCSE'2013, pp. 225-230.
11. D. Tsompanoudi and M. Satratzemi, "A web-based authoring tool for scripting distributed pair programming," in Proc. ICALT'2014, pp. 259-263.
12. L. Kobbe, A. Weinberger, P. Dillenbourg, A. Harrer, R. Hämäläinen, P. Häkkinen, and F. Fischer, "Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts," ijCSCL, vol. 2, no. 2-3, pp. 211-224, Sep. 2007.
13. L. Williams, "Lessons learned from seven years of pair programming at North Carolina State University," ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 79-83, Dec. 2007.
14. J. W. Strijbos and A. Weinberger, "Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning," Computers Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 491-494, Jul. 2010.
15. P. Dillenbourg, "Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design," Three Worlds of CSCL. Can We Support CSCL?, pp. 61-91, 2002.
16. L. Williams, L. Layman, J. Osborne, and N. Katira, "Examining the compatibility of student pair programmers," in Agile Conf., 2006.
17. G. Braught, J. Maccormick, and T. Wahls, "The benefits of pairing by ability," in Proc. 41st ACM Technical Symp. Computer Science Education, 2010, pp. 249-253.
18. L. J. Barker, "When do group projects widen the student experience gap?," in Proc. ITiCSE, 2005, pp. 276-280.
19. U. Cress, "The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research- An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods," Int. J. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69-84, 2008.
20. J. Janssen, G. Erkens, P. A. Kirschner, and G. Kanselaar, "Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning," Computers Human Behavior, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 161-170, 2009.
21. N. Z. Zacharis, "Measuring the effects of virtual pair programming in an introductory programming java course," IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 168-170, Feb. 2011.
22. G. Braught, T. Wahls, and L. M. Eby, "The case for pair programming in the computer science classroom,"ACM Trans.Computing Education (TOCE), vol. 11, no. 1, 2011.
23. L. Williams, K. Yang, E. Wiebe, M. Ferzli, and C. Miller, "Pair programming in an introductory computer science course: Initial results and recommendations," in Proc. OOPSLA Educator's Symp., 2002.
24. B. Hanks, "Problems encountered by novice pair programmers," in Proc. Int. Computing Education Res. Workshop, 2007, pp. 159-164.