A development environment for distributed synchronous collaborative programming

Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 158-162

  Boyer, Kristy Elizabeth ^a   Wight, August A D ^a   Taylor Fondren, R ^a   Vouk, Mladen A ^a   Lester, James C ^a  

^a North Carolina State University

Author keywords

Distance learning; Distributed collaboration; Distributed pair programming; Distributed tutoring; Laboratory active learning; Programming environments

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE LEARNING; DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATION; DISTRIBUTED PAIR PROGRAMMING; DISTRIBUTED TUTORING; LABORATORY/ACTIVE LEARNING; PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTERS; DISTANCE EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INNOVATION; OPEN SYSTEMS; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 57349105073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1384271.1384315     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula Final Report, http://www.sigcse.org/cc2001, (2001).
2. Apple Inc. SubEthaEdit Homepage. http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/ productivity-tools/subethaedit.html (2007).
3. Baheti P., Gehringer E. and Stotts D. Exploring the Efficacy of Distributed Pair Programming. XP Universe (2002), 208-220.
4. Baheti P., Williams L., Gehringer E., Stotts D. and Smith J. M. Distributed Pair Programming: Empirical Studies and Supporting Environments. TR02-010. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Dept. of Computer Science, 2002.
5. Beck L. L., Chizhik A. W. and McElroy A. C. Cooperative Learning Techniques in CS1: Design and Experimental Evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '05), 2005,470-474.
6. Bloom B. S. The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 6 ( 1984), 4-16.
7. Boyer K. E., Vouk M. A. and Lester J. C. The Influence of Learner Characteristics on Task-Oriented Tutorial Dialogue. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Marina del Rey, California, 2007, 365-372.
8. Chi M.T.H., Leeuw N., Chiu M. H. and LaVancher C. Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science, 18,3 (1994), 439-477.
9. Emory D. and Tamassia R. JERPA: A Distance-Learning Environment for Introductory Java Programming Courses. In Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '02), 2002, 307-311.
10. Evens M. and Michael J. One-on-One Tutoring by Humans and Computers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2006.
11. Forbes J. and Garcia D. D. ...But what do the top-rated schools do?: A Survey of Introductory Computer Science Curricula. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '07), 2007, 245-246.
12. Fox B.A. The Human Tutorial Dialogue Project. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993.
13. Hanks B. F. Distributed Pair Programming: An Empirical Study. XP/Agile Universe. 2004, 81-91.
14. Ho C.W., Raha S., Gehringer E. and Williams L. Sangam: A Distributed Pair Programming Plug-in for Eclipse. Proceedings of the 2004 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology exchange, (2004), 73-77.
15. Hubscher-Younger T. and Narayanan N. H. Constructive and Collaborative Learning of Algorithms. In Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '03), 2003, 6-10.
16. Lane H. C. and VanLehn K. Coached Program Planning: Dialogue-Based Support for Novice Program Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '03), 2003, 148-152.
17. Lepper M. R., Woolverton M., Mumme D. L. and Gurtner J. L. Motivational Techniques of Expert Human Tutors: Lessons for the Design of Computer-Based Tutors. Computers as Cognitive Tools, (1993), 75-105.
18. McDowell C., Werner L., Bullock H. and Femald J. The Effects of Pair Programming on Performance in an Introductory Programming Course. In Proceedings of the 33rd technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE V2), 2002, 38-42.
19. Nagappan N., Williams L., Ferzli M., Wiebe E., Yang K., Miller C. and Balik S. Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (SIGCSE '03), 2003, 359-362.
20. Olson G. M. and Olson J. S. Distance Matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 2/3 (2000), 139-178.
21. The Eclipse Homepage, http://www.eclipse.org, 2007
22. Werner L., Denner J. and Bean S. Pair Programming Strategies for Middle School Girls. In Proceedings of the Seventh IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, 2004, 16-18.
23. Werner L. L., Hanks B. and McDowell C. Pair-programming helps female computer science students. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC) 4, 1 ( 2004).
24. Williams L. and Kessler R. Pair Programming Illuminated. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2003.
25. Williams L. and Upchurch R. L. In support of student pair-programming. In Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '01), 2001,327-331.