Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: Preliminary experience

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1365-1373

  Rosenkrantz, Andrew B ^a   Geppert, Christian ^b   Grimm, Robert ^c   Block, Tobias K ^a   Glielmi, Christian ^b   Feng, Li ^a   Otazo, Ricardo ^a   Ream, Justin M ^a   Romolo, Melanie Moccaldi ^a   Taneja, Samir S ^d   Sodickson, Daniel K ^a   Chandarana, Hersh ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Siemens Medical Solutions MR R and D   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

imaging; perfusion; prostate; prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TUMOR VOLUME; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA COMPRESSION; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84927697503     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24661     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Franiel T, Hamm B, Hricak H,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 616-626.
2. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 746-757.
3. Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 477-494.
4. Franiel T, Stephan C, Erbersdobler A, et al. Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding-multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning. Radiology 2011; 259: 162-172.
5. Ogura K, Maekawa S, Okubo K, et al. Dynamic endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for local staging and detection of neurovascular bundle involvement of prostate cancer: correlation with histopathologic results. Urology 2001; 57: 721-726.
6. Akin O, Gultekin DH, Vargas HA, et al. Incremental value of diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation treatment: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1970-1978.
7. Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 2011; 261: 46-66.
8. Margolis DJ, Bammer R, Chow LC,. Parallel imaging of the abdomen. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15: 197-206.
9. Barth MM, Smith MP, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski RE, Rofsky NM,. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. Radiographics 2007; 27: 1445-1462; discussion 62-64.
10. Franiel T, Ludemann L, Rudolph B, et al. Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 481-487.
11. Just N, Koh DM, D'Arcy J, Collins DJ, Leach MO,. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed 2011; 24: 902-915.
12. Renshaw AA, Richie JP, Loughlin KR, Jiroutek M, Chung A, D'Amico AV,. Maximum diameter of prostatic carcinoma is a simple, inexpensive, and independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen failure in radical prostatectomy specimens. Validation in a cohort of 434 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 641-644.
13. Girouin N, Mege-Lechevallier F, Tonina Senes A, et al. Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria: is it reasonable? Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1498-1509.
14. Bloch BN, Furman-Haran E, Helbich TH, et al. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging-initial results. Radiology 2007; 245: 176-185.
15. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM,. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1182-1195.
16. Block KT, Uecker M, Frahm J,. Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 1086-1098.
17. Otazo R, Kim D, Axel L, Sodickson DK,. Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 767-776.
18. Lin W, Guo J, Rosen MA, Song HK,. Respiratory motion-compensated radial dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of chest and abdominal lesions. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1135-1146.
19. Chandarana H, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB, et al. Free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequence: a viable alternative for contrast-enhanced liver imaging in patients unable to suspend respiration. Invest Radiol 2011; 46: 648-653.
20. Winkelmann S, Schaeffter T, Koehler T, Eggers H, Doessel O,. An optimal radial profile order based on the Golden Ratio for time-resolved MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007; 26: 68-76.
21. Feng L, Grimm R, Tobias Block K, et al. Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: Combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
22. Chandarana H, Feng L, Block TK, et al. Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Radiol 2013; 48: 10-16.
23. Cornfeld DM, Israel G, McCarthy SM, Weinreb JC,. Pelvic imaging using a T1W fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 121-127.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG, (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
25. Azevedo RM, de Campos RO, Ramalho M, Heredia V, Dale BM, Semelka RC,. Free-breathing 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with radial data sampling in abdominal MRI: preliminary observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 650-657.
26. Song HK, Dougherty L,. Dynamic MRI with projection reconstruction and KWIC processing for simultaneous high spatial and temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 815-824.
27. Riffel P, Attenberger UI, Kannengiesser S, et al. Highly accelerated T1-weighted abdominal imaging using 2-dimensional controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration: a comparison with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging. Invest Radiol 2013; 48: 554-561.
28. Le Y, Kroeker R, Kipfer HD, Lin C,. Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 483-491.
29. Sung YS, Kwon HJ, Park BW, et al. Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 1122-1129.
30. Chen YJ, Chu WC, Pu YS, Chueh SC, Shun CT, Tseng WY,. Washout gradient in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is associated with tumor aggressiveness of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 912-919.
31. Hara T, Inoue Y, Satoh T, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of local recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: comparison with 22-core three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30: 1091-1098.
32. Isebaert S, De Keyzer F, Haustermans K, et al. Evaluation of semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters for prostate cancer in correlation to whole-mount histopathology. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: e217-222.
33. McClure TD, Margolis DJ, Reiter RE, et al. Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Radiology 2012; 262: 874-883.
34. Punwani S, Emberton M, Walkden M, et al. Prostatic cancer surveillance following whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound: comparison of MRI and prostate-specific antigen for detection of residual or recurrent disease. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 720-728.
35. Rouviere O, Papillard M, Girouin N, et al. Is it possible to model the risk of malignancy of focal abnormalities found at prostate multiparametric MRI? Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1149-1157.
36. Selnaes KM, Heerschap A, Jensen LR, et al. Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology. Invest Radiol 2012; 47: 624-633.
37. Valentini AL, Gui B, Cina A, et al. T2-weighted hypointense lesions within prostate gland: differential diagnosis using wash-in rate parameter on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-hystopatology correlations. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3090-3095.
38. Rischke HC, Nestle U, Fechter T, et al. 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI for GTV-definition of dominant intraprostatic lesions in patients with prostate Cancer-an interobserver variability study. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8: 183.
39. Bratan F, Niaf E, Melodelima C, et al. Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2019-2029.
40. Costa DN, Bloch BN, Yao DF, et al. Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies. Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 31: 947-952.
41. Roy C, Foudi F, Charton J, et al. Comparative sensitivities of functional MRI sequences in detection of local recurrence of prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: W361-368.
42. Schimmoller L, Quentin M, Arsov C, et al. Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 3185-3190.
43. Somford DM, Hoeks CM, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, et al. Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging at inclusion in an active surveillance protocol for low-risk prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 2013; 48: 152-157.
44. Vos EK, Litjens GJ, Kobus T, et al. Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 448-455.
45. Roethke MC, Kuru TH, Schultze S, et al. Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 344-352.