Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 483-491

  Le, Yuan ^a   Kroeker, Randall ^b   Kipfer, Hal D ^a   Lin, Chen ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

breast MR; Dixon; dynamic contrast enhancement; fat suppression; TWIST; view sharing

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DIGITAL IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FAT SUPPRESSION; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TIME RESOLVED ANGIOGRAPHY WITH STOCHASTIC TRAJECTORY;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84864228220     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23663     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kuhl C,. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007; 244: 356-378. (Pubitemid 47080868)
2. Kuhl CK,. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007; 244: 672-691. (Pubitemid 47292079)
3. Morris EA,. Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45: 863-880, vii. (Pubitemid 47410063)
4. Turnbull LW,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. NMR Biomed 2009; 22: 28-39.
5. Knopp MV, Giesel FL, Marcos H, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Choyke P,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 12: 301-308. (Pubitemid 33031399)
6. Krause U, Kroencke T, Spielhaupter E, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 449-454. (Pubitemid 40446441)
7. Yankeelov TE, Gore JC,. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: theory, data acquisition, analysis, and examples. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2009; 3: 91-107. (Pubitemid 46773870)
8. Lopata RG, Backes WH, van den Bosch PP, van Riel NA,. On the identifiability of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 425-429. (Pubitemid 47267663)
9. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee TY,. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 1057-1073. (Pubitemid 29196842)
10. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 671-675.
11. Song T, Laine AF, Chen Q, et al. Optimal k-space sampling for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with an application to MR renography. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 1242-1248.
12. Herrmann K-H, Baltzer PA, Krumbein I, Geppert C, Kaiser WA, Reichenbach JR,. resolving arterial phase in dynamic breast MRI using a fast TWIST acquisition during injection delay. In: Proc 18th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Stockholm; 2010. p 2503.
13. Janka R, Wenkel E, Geppert C, Kiefer B, Uder M,. Breast MRI using TWIST: doubling the spatial resolution "for free." In: Proc 18th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Stockholm; 2010. p 4553.
14. Doyle M, Walsh EG, Blackwell GG, Pohost GM,. Block regional interpolation scheme for k-space (BRISK): a rapid cardiac imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 163-170.
15. Parrish T, Hu X,. Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 326-336.
16. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA,. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 345-351. (Pubitemid 26299259)
17. Bley TA, Wieben O, Francois CJ, Brittain JH, Reeder SB,. Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 4-18.
18. Bernard CP, Liney GP, Manton DJ, Turnbull LW, Langton CM,. Comparison of fat quantification methods: a phantom study at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 192-197.
19. Hong HS, Kim HS, Kim MJ, De Becker J, Mitchell DG, Kanematsu M,. Single breath-hold multiarterial dynamic MRI of the liver at 3T using a 3D fat-suppressed keyhole technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 396-402.
20. Rosenkrantz AB, Mannelli L, Kim S, Babb JS,. Gadolinium-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging using a 2-point Dixon fat-water separation technique: impact upon image quality and lesion detection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35: 96-101.
21. Balchandani P, Spielman D,. Fat suppression for 1H MRSI at 7T using spectrally selective adiabatic inversion recovery. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 980-988. (Pubitemid 351590510)
22. Schick F,. Simultaneous highly selective MR water and fat imaging using a simple new type of spectral-spatial excitation. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 194-202. (Pubitemid 28361522)
23. Meyer CH, Pauly JM, Macovski A, Nishimura DG,. Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 1990; 15: 287-304. (Pubitemid 20278265)
24. Dixon WT,. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984; 153: 189-194. (Pubitemid 14043406)
25. Le-Petross H, Kundra V, Szklaruk J, Wei W, Hortobagyi GN, Ma J,. Fast three-dimensional dual echo dixon technique improves fat suppression in breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 889-894.
26. Nael K, Krishnam M, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ, Laub G, Finn JP,. Time-resolved MR angiography in the evaluation of central thoracic venous occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1731-1738.
27. Lim RP, Shapiro M, Wang EY, et al. 3D time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced bolus-chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1847-1854.
28. Yu H, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA, et al. Phase and amplitude correction for multi-echo water-fat separation with bipolar acquisitions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 1264-1271.
29. Hines CD, Yu H, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA, Brittain JH, Reeder SB,. T1 independent, T2* corrected MRI with accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat: validation in a fat-water-SPIO phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 1215-1222.
30. Liney GP, Tozer DJ, Turnbull LW,. A simple and realistic tissue-equivalent breast phantom for MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 968-971.
31. Freed M, de Zwart JA, Loud JT, et al. An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI. Med Phys 2011; 38: 743-753.
32. Hoory T, Ramsay E, Plewes DB,. Effect of Gd-DTPA induCED susceptibility on single-point Dixon fat/water separation. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 925-929. (Pubitemid 351501961)
33. Saranathan M, Rettmann D, Bayram E, Lee C, Glockner J,. Multiecho time-resolved acquisition (META): a high spatiotemporal resolution Dixon imaging sequence for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 1406-1413.
34. Eggers H, Brendel B, Duijndam A, Herigault G,. Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 96-107.
35. Lu W, Yu H, Shimakawa A, Alley M, Reeder SB, Hargreaves BA,. Water-fat separation with bipolar multiecho sequences. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 198-209. (Pubitemid 351956624)
36. Oesterle C, Strohschein R, Kohler M, Schnell M, Hennig J,. Benefits and pitfalls of keyhole imaging, especially in first-pass perfusion studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 312-323. (Pubitemid 30127700)