Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 197, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1122-1129

  Sung, Yu Sub ^a   Kwon, Heon Ju ^a   Park, Bum Woo ^a   Cho, Gyunggoo ^b   Lee, Chang Kyung ^a   Cho, Kyoung Sik ^a   Kim, Jeong Kon ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computer aided diagnosis; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Perfusion parameter; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; DRUG ELIMINATION; DRUG TISSUE LEVEL; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; EXTRAVASCULAR SPACE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL DETECTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80054958174     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.6062     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Choi YJ, Kim JK, Kim N, Kim KW, Choi EK, Cho KS. Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:63-75
2. Quint LE, Van Erp JS, Bland PH, et al. Carcinoma of the prostate: MR images obtained with body coils do not accurately reflect tumor volume. AJR 1991; 156:511-516
3. Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Leibel SA, Scardino PT. Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 2007; 243:28-53 (Pubitemid 46579693)
4. Bloch BN, Furman-Haran E, Helbich TH, et al. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast- enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging - initial results. Radiology 2007; 245:176-185 (Pubitemid 47417801)
5. Buckley DL, Roberts C, Parker GJ, Logue JP, Hutchinson CE. Prostate cancer: evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging - initial experience. Radiology 2004; 233:709-715
6. Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Laheij RJ, et al. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 229:248-254 (Pubitemid 37152132)
7. Futterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, et al. Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast- enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 2006; 241:449-458 (Pubitemid 44632891)
8. Kim JK, Hong SS, Choi YJ, et al. Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22:639-646 (Pubitemid 41572716)
9. Vos PC, Hambrock T, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ. Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Med Phys 2008; 35:888-899 (Pubitemid 351322670)
10. Zakian KL, Sircar K, Hricak H, et al. Correlation of proton MR spectroscopic imaging with Gleason score based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy. Radiology 2005; 234:804-814 (Pubitemid 40250824)
11. Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD. Endorectal diffusion- weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20:654-661 (Pubitemid 39313742)
12. Lim HK, Kim JK, Kim KA, Cho K-S. Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection - a multireader study. Radiology 2008; 250:145-151
13. Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, Hess T, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:506-514
14. Buckley DL, Kerslake RW, Blackband SJ, Horsman A. Quantitative analysis of multi-slice Gd- DTPA enhanced dynamic MR images using an automated simplex minimization procedure. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32:646-651 (Pubitemid 24338213)
15. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:91-101 (Pubitemid 28365643)
16. Chen S, Hong X, Harris CJ. Sparse kernel density construction using orthogonal forward regression with leave-one-out test score and local regularization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 2004; 34:1708-1717
17. Lee MM, Keerthi SS, Ong CJ, DeCoste D. An efficient method for computing leave-one-out error in support vector machines with Gaussian kernels. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2004; 15:750-757
18. Cheikh AB, Girouin N, Colombel M, et al. Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy. Eur Radiol 2008; 19:770-778
19. Heijmink SWTPJ, Futterer JJ, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T - comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Radiology 2007; 244:184-195 (Pubitemid 46981973)
20. Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA, et al. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. Radiology 1997; 203:645-652 (Pubitemid 27227409)
21. Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B. Localization of prostate cancer using 3T MRI: comparison of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30:7-11 (Pubitemid 43052291)
22. Noworolski SM, Vigneron DB, Chen AP, Kurhanewicz J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MR diffusion imaging to distinguish between glandular and stromal prostatic tissues. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26:1071-1080
23. Ocak I, Bernardo M, Metzger G, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. AJR 2007; 189:849; [web]W192-W201
24. Oyen RH. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: is this the way to proceed for characterization of prostatic carcinoma? Eur Radiol 2003; 13:921-924 (Pubitemid 36790582)
25. Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Haussler D, ed. Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on computational learning theory. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 1992
26. Burges CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 1998; 2:121-167 (Pubitemid 128695475)
27. Wan V, Campbell WM. Support vector machines for speaker verification and identification. In: Neural networks for signal processing X, 2000: proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Signal Processing Society workshop. New York, NY: IEEE, 2000:775-784 (Pubitemid 32070263)
28. Osuna E, Freund R, Girosit F. Training support vector machines: an application to face detection. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition, 1997: proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Computer Society conference. New York, NY: IEEE, 1997:130-136
29. Dumais ST. Using SVMs for text categorization. IEEE Intell Syst 1998; 13:21-25
30. Burges CJC, Schölkopf B. Improving the accuracy and speed of support vector learning machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997
31. Schölkopf B, Burges C, Vapnik V. Incorporating invariances in support vector learning machines. In: von der Malsburg C, von Seelen W, Vorbrüggen JC, Sendhoff B, eds. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on artificial neural networks. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1996: 47-52
32. Furey TS, Cristianini N, Duffy N, Bednarski DW, Schummer M, Haussler D. Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:906-914
33. Zien A, Ratsch G, Mika S, Scholkopf B, Lengauer T, Muller KR. Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:799-807
34. Ding CHQ, Dubchak I. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics 2001; 17:349-358 (Pubitemid 32421929)
35. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000