T2-weighted hypointense lesions within prostate gland: Differential diagnosis using wash-in rate parameter on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging - Hystopatology correlations

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3090-3095

  Valentini, Anna Lia ^a   Gui, Benedetta ^a   Cina, Alessandro ^a   Pinto, Francesco ^a   Totaro, Angelo ^a   Pierconti, Francesco ^b   Bassi, Pier Francesco ^a   Bonomo, Lorenzo ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME; WASH IN RATE;

AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; ITALY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84867013392     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. A. Heidenreich, J. Bellmunt, and M. Bolla EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. European Association of Urology European Urolology 59 2011 61 71
2. M. Tubiume, Y. Yamada, K. Nakamura, and N. Honda Retrospective study comparing six- and twelve-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer International Brazilian Journal of Urology 34 2008 9 14
3. A. Takenaka, R. Hara, and Y. Hyodo Trans-perineal extended biopsy improves the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate: a comparative study of 6 and 12 biopsy cores International Journal of Urology 13 2006 10 14
4. A.P.S. Kirkham, M. Emberton, and C. Allen How good is MRI at detecting and characterizing cancer within the prostate? European Urology 50 2006 1163 1175
5. A. Prando, and A. Billis Focal prostatic atrophy: mimicry of prostatic cancer on TRUS and 3D-MRSI studies Abdominal Imaging 34 2009 271 275
6. 1H MR spectroscopic imaging findings - initial observations Radiology 231 2004 717 724
7. J.E. McNeal, E.A. Redwine, F.S. Freiha, and T.A. Stamey Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread American Journal of Surgical Pathology 12 1988 897 906
8. J.S. Yuen, C.H. Thng, and P.H. Tan Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy Journal of Urology 171 2004 1482 1486
9. J.K. Kim, S.S. Hong, and Y.J. Choi Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 22 2005 639 646
10. H. Hricak, P.L. Choyke, S.C. Eberhardt, S.A. Leibel, and P.T. Scardino Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective Radiology 243 2007 28 53
11. Y.J. Choi, J.K. Kim, N. Kim, K.W. Kim, E.K. Choi, and K-Sik. Cho Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer Radiographics 27 2007 63 77
12. A.W. Partin, M.W. Kattan, and E.N. Subong Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update Journal of the American Medical Association 14 1997 1445 1451
13. D.G. Bostwick, R.P. Myers, and J.E. Oesterling Staging prostate cancer Seminars in Surgical Oncology 10 1994 60 72
14. L. Cheng, M.F. Darson, E.J. Bergstralh, J. Slezak, R.P. Myers, and D.G. Bostwick Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma Cancer 86 1999 1775 1782
15. L. Cheng, J. Slezak, and E.J. Bergstralh Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy Journal of Clinical Oncology 18 2000 2862 2868
16. L.E. Eichelberger, M.O. Koch, and J.K. Daggy Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer American Journal of Clinical Pathology 120 2003 386 391
17. H. Hong, Koch Mo, and R.S. Foster Anatomic distribution of periprostatic adipose tissue: a mapping study of 100 radical prostatectomy specimens Cancer 97 2003 1639 1643
18. S. Isebaert, F. De Keyzer, and K. Haustermans Evaluation of semi-quantitative dymanic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters for prostate cancer in correlation to whole-mount histopatology European Journal of Radiology 81 2012 217 222
19. Y.S. Sung, H.J. Kwon, and B.W. Park Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis vs. single perfusion parameter American Journal of Roentgenology 2011 1122 1129
20. O. Rouvière, A. Raudrant, and R. Ecochard Charaterization of time-enhancement curves of benign and malignant prostate tissue at dynamic MR imaging European Radiology 13 2003 931 942
21. A. Sciarra, V. Panebianco, and M. Ciccariello Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MRI): pattern changes from inflammation to prostate cancer Cancer Investigation 28 2010 424 432