Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 617-625

  Lobato, Emilio ^a   Mendoza, Jorge ^b   Sims, Valerie ^a   Chin, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONSPIRACY BELIEF; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; NEUROSIS; PARANORMAL BELIEF; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOSCIENCE ACCEPTANCE; RELIGION; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; SOCIAL BELIEF; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84927690468     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3042     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1227-1236.
2. Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Belief in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637-647.
3. Astin, J. A. (1998). Why patients use alternative medicine: Results of a national study. JAMA, 279(19), 1548-1553.
4. Baker, J. O. (2013). Acceptance of evolution and support for teaching creationism in public schools: The conditional impact of educational attainment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(1), 216-228.
5. Boudry, M., & Braeckman, J. (2011). Immunizing strategies and epistemic defense mechanisms. Philosophia, 39, 145-161.
6. Boudry, M., & Braeckman, J. (2012). How convenient! The epistemic rationale of self-validating belief systems. Philosophical Psychology, 25, 341-364.
7. Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
8. Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
9. Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 381-393.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197-253.
11. Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation, and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1289-1293.
12. Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192-203.
13. Eder, E., Turic, K., Milasowszky, N., Van Adzin, K., & Herogivch, A. (2011). The relationship between paranormal belief, creationism, intelligent design, and evolution at secondary schools in Vienna (Austria). Science & Education, 20, 517-534.
14. Emmons, C. F., & Sobal, J. (1981). Paranormal beliefs: Functional alternatives to mainstream religion? Review of Religious Research, 22, 301-312.
15. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytic-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
16. Ernst, E. (2000). The role of complementary and alternative medicine. BMJ[British Medical Journal], 321(7269), 1133-1135.
17. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 454-459.
18. Genovese, J. E. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, schizotypy, and thinking styles among teachers and future teachers. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(1), 93-102.
19. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731-742.
20. Hansson, S. O. (2009). Cutting the Gordian knot of demarcation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 23, 237-243.
21. Hergovich, A., Schott, R., & Arendasy, M. (2005). Paranormal belief and religiosity. The Journal of Parapsychology, 69, 293-304.
22. Johnson, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2004). Is knowledge of science associated with higher skepticism of pseudoscientific claims? The American Biology Teacher, 66(8), 536-548.
23. Keinan, G. (2002). The effects of stress and desire for control on superstitious behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 102-108.
24. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One, 8(10), e75637.
25. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing - therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622-633.
26. Lindeman, M. (2011). Biases in intuitive reasoning and belief in complementary and alternative medicine. Psychology and Health, 26, 371-382.
27. Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2006). Paranormal beliefs: Their dimensionality and correlates. European Journal of Personality, 20, 585-602.
28. Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 731-744.
29. Lindeman, M., & Saher, M. (2007). Vitalism, purpose, and superstition. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 33-44.
30. Lindeman, M., Cederström, S., Simola, P., Simula, A., Ollikainen, S., & Riekki, T. (2008). Sentences with core knowledge violations increase the size of N400 among paranormal beliefs. Cortex, 44, 1307-1315.
31. Lindeman, M., Svedholm, A. M., Takada, M., Lönnqvist, J., & Verkasalo, M. (2011). Core knowledge confusion among university students. Science & Education, 20, 439-451.
32. Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 290-298.
33. Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011a). Creatures in the classroom: Preservice teacher beliefs about fantastic beasts, magic, extraterrestrials, evolution, and creation. Science & Education, 20(5), 473-489.
34. Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011b). The influence of education major: How diverse preservice teachers view pseudoscience topics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 579-591.
35. Losh, S. C., Tavani, C. M., Njoroge, R., Wilke, R., & McAuley, M. (2003). What does education really do? Educational dimensions and pseudoscience support in the American general public, 1979-2001. The Skeptical Inquirer, 27, 30-35.
36. Nahin, R. L., Barnes, P. M., Stussman, B. J., & Bloom, B. (2009). Costs of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and frequency of visits to CAM practitioners: United States, 2007. National Health Statistics Report, 18, 1-14.
37. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
38. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765-766.
39. National Science Foundation. (2006). Science and engineering: Indicators 2006. Science and technology: Public attitudes and public understanding. Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c7/c7s2.htm (accessed May 29, 2008)
40. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335-346.
41. Persinger, M. A., & Makarec, K. (1990). Exotic beliefs may be substitutes for religious beliefs. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 16-18.
42. Raman, N. V., Chattopadhyay, P., & Hoyer, W. D. (1995). Do consumers seek emotional situations: The need for emotion scale. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 537-542.
43. Rice, T. W. (2003). Believe it or not: Religious and other paranormal beliefs in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 95-106.
44. Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of type 1 and type 2 processing. Mind & Society, 11, 3-13.
45. Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 434.
46. Svedholm, A. M., Lindeman, M., & Lipsanen, J. (2010). Believing in the purpose of events: Why does it occur and is it supernatural? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 252-265.
47. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracy beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749-761.
48. Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 120, 443-463.
49. Tobacyk, J. J. (2004). A revised paranormal belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23, 94-98.
50. Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115-117.
51. Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767-773.
52. Yates, G. C. R., & Chandler, M. (2000). Where have all the skeptics gone?: Patterns of new age beliefs and anti-scientific attitudes in preservice primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 377-387.
53. Zonis, M., & Joseph, C. M. (1994). Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology, 15, 443-459.