Cutting the Gordian knot of demarcation

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 237-243

  Hansson, Sven Ove ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73649140294     PISSN: 02698595     EISSN: 14699281     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02698590903196007     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Baigrie, Brian S. 1988. Siegel on the rationality of science. Philosophy of Science 55: 435-441
2. Bunge, Mario. 1982. Demarcating science from pseudoscience. Fundamenta Scientiae 3: 369-388
3. Cioffi, Frank. 1985. Psychoanalysis, pseudoscience and testability. In Popper and the human sciences, edited by Gregory Currie and Alan Musgrave, 13-44. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff
4. -. 1998. Freud and the question of pseudoscience. Chicago, IL: Open Court
5. Derksen, A. A. 1993. The seven sins of pseudoscience. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24: 17-42
6. -. 2001. The seven strategies of the sophisticated pseudoscience: A look into Freud's rhetorical tool box. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32: 329-350
7. Dolby, R. G. A. 1987. Science and pseudoscience: The case of creationism. Zygon 22: 195-212
8. Dupré, John. 1993. The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
9. Dutch, Steven I. 1982. Notes on the nature of fringe science. Journal of Geological Education 30: 6-13
10. Feleppa, Robert. 1990. Kuhn, Popper, and the normative problem of demarcation. In Philosophy of science and the occult, edited by Patrick Grim, 140-155. 2nd ed. Albany: SUNY Press
11. Fuller, Steve. 1985. The demarcation of science: A problem whose demise has been greatly exaggerated. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66: 329-341
12. Gardner, Martin. 1957. Fads and fallacies in the name of science. New York: Dover
13. Glymour, Clark, and Douglas Stalker. 1990. Winning through pseudoscience. In Philosophy of science and the occult, edited by Patrick Grim, 92-103. 2nd ed. Albany: SUNY Press
14. Grove, J. W. 1985. Rationality at risk: Science against pseudoscience. Minerva 23: 216-240
15. Grünbaum, Adolf. 1979. Is Freudian psychoanalytic theory pseudoscientific by Karl Popper's criterion of demarcation? American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 131-141
16. Hansson, Sven Ove. 1983. Vetenskap och ovetenskap. Stockholm: Tiden
17. -. 1996. Defining pseudoscience. Philosophia Naturalis 33: 169-176
18. -. 2007. Values in pure and applied science. Foundations of Science 12: 257-268
19. Kitcher, Philip. 1982. Abusing science: The case against creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
20. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1974. Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In The philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 798-819. La Salle, IL: Open Court
21. Lakatos, Imre. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 91-197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. -. 1974a. Popper on demarcation and induction. In The philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 241-273. La Salle, IL: Open Court
23. -. 1974b. Science and pseudoscience. Conceptus 8: 5-9
24. -. 1981. Science and pseudoscience. In Conceptions of inquiry: A reader, edited by Stuart Brown, John Fauvel, and Ruth Finnegan, 114-121. London: Methuen
25. Mahner, Martin. 2007. Demarcating science from non-science. In Handbook of the philosophy of science: General philosophy of science - Focal issues, edited by Theo Kuipers, 515-575. Amsterdam: Elsevier
26. Popper, Karl R. 1974. Reply to my critics. In The philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 961-1197. La Salle, IL: Open Court
27. -. 1989. Falsifizierbarkeit, zwei Bedeutungen von. In Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie, edited by Helmut Seiffert and Gerard Radnitzky, 82-86. 2nd ed., 1994. München: Ehrenwirth
28. Radner, Daisie, and Michael Radner. 1982. Science and unreason. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
29. Reisch, George A. 1998. Pluralism, logical empiricism, and the problem of pseudoscience. Philosophy of Science 65: 333-348
30. Rothbart, Daniel. 1990. Demarcating genuine science from pseudoscience. In Philosophy of science and the occult, edited by Patrick Grim, 111-122. 2nd ed. Albany: SUNY Press
31. Ruse, Michael, ed. 1996. But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books
32. Thagard, Paul R. 1978. Why astrology is a pseudoscience. In PSA 1978: Proceedings of the 1978 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by Peter D. Asquith and Ian Hacking, 1: 223-234. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association
33. -. 1988. Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
34. Vollmer, Gerhard. 1993. Wissenschaftstheorie im Einsatz: Beiträge zu einer selbstkritischen Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Hirzel