Extensive heterosis in growth of yeast hybrids is explained by a combination of genetic models

Heredity

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 316-326

  Shapira, R ^a   Levy, T ^a   Shaked, S ^a   Fridman, E ^a   David, L ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HETEROSIS; PHYLOGENY; YEAST;

GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRID VIGOR; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; YEASTS;

EID: 84927176669     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.33     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baranwal VK, Mikkilineni V, Zehr UB, Tyagi AK, Kapoor S (2012). Heterosis: emerging ideas about hybrid vigour. Expl Bot 63: 6309-6314.
2. Botstein D, Chervitz SA, Cherry JM (1997). Yeast as a model organism. Science (New York, NY) 277: 1259-1260.
3. Bruce AB (1910). The mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science (New York, NY) 32: 627-628.
4. Chao A, Lin CW (2012). Nonparametric lower bounds for species richness and shared species richness under sampling without replacement. Biometrics 68: 912-921.
5. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10: 783-796.
6. Chen ZJ (2010). Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor. Trends Plant Sci 15: 57-71.
7. Cheres MT, Miller JF, Crane JR, Knapp SJ (2000). Genetic distance as a predictor of heterosis and hybrid performance within and between heterotic groups in sunflower. Theoret Appl Genet 100: 889-894.
8. Crow JF (1948). Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33: 477-487.
9. Darwin CR (1876). The Effect of Cross and Self-Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. John Murray: London.
10. Dean EJ, Davis JC, Davis RW, Petrov DA (2008). Pervasive and persistent redundancy among duplicated genes in yeast. PLoS Genet 4: e1000113.
11. Doniger SW, Kim HS, Swain D, Corcuera D, Williams M, Yang S-P et al. (2008). A catalog of neutral and deleterious polymorphism in yeast. PLoS Genet 4: e1000183.
12. East EM (1908). Inbreeding in corn. In: Reports of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for Years 1907-1908. pp 419-428.
13. Gietz RD, Woods RA (2002). Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. In: Guthrie C, Fink GR (eds). Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular and Cell Biology, Part B, Vol. 350, Elsevier Science: San Diego, CA, USA. pp 87-96.
14. Goff SA (2011). A unifying theory for general multigenic heterosis: energy efficiency, protein metabolism, and implications for molecular breeding. N Phytol 189: 923-937.
15. Guo X, Guo Y, Ma J, Wang F, Sun M, Gui L et al. (2013). Mapping heterotic loci for yield and agronomic traits using chromosome segment introgression lines in cotton. J Integr Plant Biol 55: 759-774.
16. Hedgecock D, Lin JZ, DeCola S, Haudenschild CD, Meyer E, Manahan DT et al. (2007). Transcriptomic analysis of growth heterosis in larval Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 2313-2318.
17. Hillenmeyer ME, Ericson E, Davis RW, Nislow C, Koller D, Giaever G (2010). Systematic analysis of genome-wide fitness data in yeast reveals novel gene function and drug action. Genome Biol 11: R30.
18. Jones DF (1917). Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2: 466-479.
19. Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2010). The flowering gene single flower truss drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet 42: 459-463.
20. Li W, Zhu H, Challa GS, Zhang Z (2013). A non-additive interaction in a single locus causes a very short root phenotype in wheat. Theoret Appl Genet 126: 1189-1200.
21. Li Y, Zhang X, Ma C, Shen J, Chen Q, Wang T et al. (2012). QTL and epistatic analyses of heterosis for seed yield and three yield component traits using molecular markers in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Genetika 48: 1171-1178.
22. Li ZK, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu QY, Tabien R et al. (2001). Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158: 1737-1753.
23. Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2007). Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet 23: 60-66.
24. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, James SA et al. (2009). Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
25. Luo LJ, Li ZK, Mei HW, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB et al. (2001). Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 158: 1755-1771.
26. McClintock B (1984). The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science (New York, NY) 226: 792-801.
27. McCusker JH, Clemons KV, Stevens DA, Davis RW (1994). Genetic characterization of pathogenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Genetics 136: 1261-1269.
28. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Piepho HP, Zeng ZB, Schon CC (2007). The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systems-oriented approach. Genetics 177: 1815-1825.
29. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Schon CC (2008). Genetic expectations of quantitative trait loci main and interaction effects obtained with the triple testcross design and their relevance for the analysis of heterosis. Genetics 178: 2265-2274.
30. Richards KD, Goddard MR, Gardner RC (2009). A database of microsatellite genotypes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 96: 355-359.
31. Saito R, Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Lotia S et al. (2012). A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods 9: 1069-1076.
32. Schacherer J, Ruderfer DM, Gresham D, Dolinski K, Botstein D, Kruglyak L (2007). Genome-wide analysis of nucleotide-level variation in commonly used Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. PLoS One 2: e322.
33. Schnable PS, Springer NM (2013). Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 71-88.
34. Semel Y, Nissenbaum J, Menda N, Zinder M, Krieger U, Issman N et al. (2006). Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12981-12986.
35. Sinha H, Nicholson BP, Steinmetz LM, McCusker JH (2006). Complex genetic interactions in a quantitative trait locus. PLoS Genet 2: e13.
36. St Onge RP, Mani R, Oh J, Proctor M, Fung E, Davis RW et al. (2007). Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nat Genet 39: 199-206.
37. Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ, McCusker JH et al. (2002). Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 416: 326-330.
38. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739.
39. Timberlake WE, Frizzell MA, Richards KD, Gardner RC (2011). A new yeast genetic resource for analysis and breeding. Yeast 28: 63-80.
40. Warringer J, Zorgo E, Cubillos FA, Zia A, Gjuvsland A, Simpson JT et al. (2011). Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet 7: e1002111.
41. Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD (1995). Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.
42. Yao H, Dogra Gray A, Auger DL, Birchler JA (2012). Genomic dosage effects on heterosis in triploid maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 2665-2669.
43. Zhang T, Ni X-l, Jiang K-f, Deng H-f, He Q, Yang Q-h et al. (2010). Relationship between heterosis and parental genetic distance based on molecular markers for functional genes related to yield traits in rice. Rice Sci 17: 288-295.
44. Ziv N, Siegal ML, Gresham D (2013). Genetic and nongenetic determinants of cell growth variation assessed by high-throughput microscopy. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2568-2578.
45. Zorgo E, Gjuvsland A, Cubillos FA, Louis EJ, Liti G, Blomberg A et al. (2012). Life history shapes trait heredity by accumulation of loss-of-function alleles in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1781-1789.