A survey of user perceptions of digital library e-quality and affinity

Serials Review

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 3-11

  Zha, Xianjin ^a   Xiao, Zhiliang ^a   Zhang, Jinchao ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Affinity; China; Digital libraries; Information quality; Service quality; System quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925866647     PISSN: 00987913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2014.895555     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aldás-Manzano, J., Ruiz-Mafé, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2009). Exploring individual personality factors as drivers ofM-shopping acceptance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(6), 739–757.
2. Arms, W. Y. (2012). The 1990s: The formative years of digital libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(4), 579–591.
3. Babalhavaeji, F., Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Aqili, S. V., & Shakooii, A. (2010). Quality assessment of academic libraries’ performance with a special reference to information technology-based services: Suggesting an evaluation checklist. The Electronic Library, 28(4), 592–621.
4. Balaban, I., Mu, E., & Divjak, B. (2013). Development of an electronic portfolio system success model: An information systems approach. Computers & Education, 60(1), 396–411.
5. Chen, Y. T., & Chou, T. Y. (2011). Applying GRA and QFD to improve library service quality. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 237–245.
6. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
7. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone andMcLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
8. Gerke, J., & Maness, J. M. (2010). The physical and the virtual: The relationship between library as place and electronic collections. College & Research Libraries, 71(1), 20–31.
9. Goncalves, M. A., Moreira, B. L., Fox, E. A., & Watson, L. T. (2007).What is a good digital library? A quality model for digital libraries. Information Processing and Management, 43(5), 1416–1437.
10. Gorla, N. (2011). An assessment of information systems service quality using SERVQUAL+. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42(3), 46–70.
11. Gorla, N., Somers, T.M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207–228.
12. Heradio, R., Fernández-Amoros, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2012). A review of quality evaluation of digital libraries based on users’ perceptions. Journal of Information Science, 38(3), 269–283.
13. Kani-Zabihi, E., Ghinea, G., & Chen, S. Y. (2006). Digital libraries: What do users want? Online Information Review, 30(4), 395–412.
14. Kim, K. S., & Sin, S. C. J. (2011). Selecting quality sources: Bridging the gap between the perception and use of information sources. Journal of Information Science, 37(2), 178–188.
15. Kim, Y. M., & Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of Library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: A knowledge management perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 211–218.
16. Kiran, K., & Diljit S. (2012). Modeling Web-based library service quality. Library & Information Science Research, 34(3), 184–196.
17. Landrum, H., & Prybutok, V. R. (2004). A service quality and successmodel for the information service industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(3), 628–642.
18. Lim, S., & Kwon, N. (2010). Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source? Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 212–220.
19. Luo, C. R., Wang, J. F., & Zhou, Z. N. (2010). Regional consortia for eresources: A case study of deals in the South China Region. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 44(4), 328–341.
20. Noh, Y. (2012). A study measuring the performance of electronic resources in academic libraries. ASLIB Proceedings, 64(2), 134–153.
21. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233.
22. Perse, E. M. (1986). Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30(2), 175–193.
23. Pinto, M., Fernández-Marcial, V., & Gómez-Camarero, C. (2010). The impact of information behavior in academic library service quality: A case study of the science and technology area in Spain. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 70–78.
24. Ross, L., & Sennyey, P. (2008). The library is dead, long live the library! The practice of academic librarianship and the digital revolution. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(2), 145–152.
25. Ruiz-Mafé, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2006). Explaining Internet dependency: An exploratory study of future purchase intention of Spanish Internet users. Internet Research, 16(4), 380–397.
26. Shah, C., & Kitzie, V. (2012). Social Q& A and virtual reference-comparing apples and orangeswith the help of experts and users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 2020–2036.
27. Straub, D. W., Boudreau, M. C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 380–427.
28. Wang, Y. S. (2008). Assessing e-commerce systems success: A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Journal, 18(5), 529–557.
29. Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y.W. (2008).Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–733.
30. West, W. L., & Miller, H. S. (2011). Electronic journals:Cataloging andmanagement practices in academic libraries. Serials Review, 37(4), 267–274.
31. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.
32. Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006).Measuring KM Ssuccess:Arespecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information & Management, 43(6), 728–739.
33. Yaari, E., Baruchson-Arbib, S., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2011). Information quality assessment of community-generated content—A user study ofWikipedia. Journal of Information Science, 37(5), 487–498.
34. Yan, Y. L., Zha, X. J., & Xiao, Z. L. (2013). Exploring users’ perceptions of conventional and unconventional electronic resources. Serials Review, 39(2), 105–113.
35. Yao, X. X. (2012). Evaluation and promotion: The cooperative purchase experience of academic libraries in China. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 36(3–4), 97–106.
36. Yao, X. X., & Zeng, L. J. (2012). CALIS: Interlibrary loan and document delivery services in China. Interlending & Document Supply, 40(2), 111–114.
37. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46.
38. Zha, X. J., Li, J., & Yan, Y. L. (2012). Understanding usage transfer from print resources to electronic resources: A survey of users of Chinese university libraries. Serials Review, 38(2), 93–98.
39. Zhang, Y. (2010). Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 88–110.
40. Zhou, Q. (2005). The development of digital libraries in China and the shaping of digital librarians. The Electronic Library, 23(4), 433–441.
41. Zhou, T. (2011). Examining the critical success factors of mobile website adoption. Online Information Review, 35(4), 636–652.
42. Zhou, T. (2012). Understanding users’ initial trust in mobile banking: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Computers inHuman Behavior, 28(4), 1518–1525.
43. Zhu, Q. (2003). China academic library and information system: Current situation and future development. The International Information & Library Review, 35(2/4), 399–405.