Morphosyntactic complexity:Atypology of lexical splits

Language

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 145-193

  Corbett, Greville G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allomorphy; Canonical typology; Inflectional morphology; Morphome; Possible lexeme; Split paradigm

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925856280     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: 15350665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2015.0003     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. Ackerman, Farrell; James P. Blevins; and Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, ed. by James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Adamou, Evangelia. 2012. Verb morphologies in contact: Evidence from the Balkan area. Morphologies in contact, ed. by Martine Vanhove, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze, and Hitomi Otsuka, 143–62. Berlin: Akademie.
3. Adger, David. 2009. Gaelic: A language tutorial. Presented at the annual conference of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, University of Edinburgh, 6–9 September 2009. Online: http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/lagb2009/.
4. Albright, Adam, and Eric Fuß. 2012. Syncretism. In Trommer, 236–88. Anderson, Stephen R. 1984. On representations in morphology: Case, agreement and inversion in Georgian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2.157–218.
5. Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Anderson, Stephen R. 2011. Stress-conditioned allomorphy in Surmiran (Rumantsch). In Maiden et al., 8–23.
7. Anderson, Stephen R. 2013. Stem alternations in Swiss Rumantsch. In Cruschina et al., 262–83.
8. Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. (Linguistic Inquiry monographs 22.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Aronoff, Mark. 2012. Morphological stems: What William of Ockham really said. In Bonami 2012b, 28–51.
10. Aronson, Howard I. 1982. Georgian: A reading grammar. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
11. Aronson, Howard I. 1991. Modern Georgian. The Indigenous languages of the Caucasus, vol. 1: The Kartvelian languages, ed. by Alice C. Harris, 219–312. Delmar: Caravan Books.
12. Asudeh, Ash; Mary Dalrymple; and Ida Toivonen. 2013. Constructions with lexical integrity. Journal of Language Modelling 1.1–54.
13. Baerman, Matthew. 2006. Kayardild. Typological database on deponency, by Greville G. Corbett, Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown, and Andrew Hippisley. Online: http:// www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/deponency/. Specific page: http://www.smg.surrey.ac.uk /Deponency/WALS/Kayardild.htm#, accessed 25 April 2012.
14. Baerman, Matthew. 2008. Historical observations on defectiveness: The first singular non-past. Russian Linguistics 32.81–97.
15. Baerman, Matthew. 2013. Inflection class interactions. Morphology in Toulouse: Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7 (Toulouse, 2–3 December 2010), ed. by Nabil Hathout, Fabio Montermini, and Jesse Tseng, 11–33. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
16. Baerman, Matthew. 2014. Covert systematicity in a distributionally complex system. Journal of Linguistics 50.1–47.
17. Baerman, Matthew; Dunstan Brown; and Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax- morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Baerman, Matthew; Dunstan Brown; and Greville G. Corbett (eds.) 2015. Understanding and measuring morphological complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, to appear.
19. Baerman, Matthew, and Greville G. Corbett. 2012. Stem alternations and multiple exponence. In Bonami 2012b, 52–68.
20. Baerman, Matthew; Greville G. Corbett; and Dunstan Brown (eds.) 2010. Defective paradigms: Missing forms and what they tell us. (Proceedings of the British Academy 163.) Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.
21. Baerman, Matthew; Greville G. Corbett; Dunstan Brown; and Andrew Hippisley (eds.) 2007. Deponency and morphological mismatches. (Proceedings of the British Academy 145.) Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.
22. Blevins, James P. 2003. Stems and paradigms. Language 79.737–67.
23. Bliese, Loren F. 1981. A generative grammar of Afar. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.
24. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2002. Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. Yearbook of Morphology 2001.53–85
25. Bonami, Olivier. 2012a. Introduction. In Bonami 2012b, 1–6.
26. Bonami, Olivier (ed.) 2012b. Stems. (Special issue of Word Structure 5.1.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
27. Bonami, Olivier, and Gilles Boyé. 2007. French pronominal clitics and the design of paradigm function morphology. Online proceedings of the Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 5.291–322. Online: http://www3.lingue.unibo.it/mmm2/?page_id=71.
28. Bonami, Olivier, and Gilles Boyé. 2008. Paradigm shape is morphomic in Nepali. Paper presented at the 13th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2008.
29. Bond, Oliver. 2013. A base for canonical negation. In Brown et al. 2013, 20–47.
30. Bond, Oliver. 2016. Negation through reduplication and tone: Implications for the LFG/ PFM interface. Journal of Linguistics, to appear.
31. Bonet, Eulàlia, and Daniel Harbour. 2012. Contextual allomorphy. In Trommer, 195–235.
32. Boretzky, Norbert. 1993. Bugurdži: Deskriptiver und historischer Abriß eines Romani- Dialekts. (Balkanologische Veröffentlichungen 21.) Berlin: Harrassowitz.
33. Brown, Dunstan, and Marina Chumakina. 2013. What there might be and what there is: An introduction to canonical typology. In Brown et al. 2013, 1–19.
34. Brown, Dunstan; Marina Chumakina; and Greville G. Corbett (eds.) 2013. Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Brown, Dunstan; Marina Chumakina; Greville Corbett; Gergana Popova; and Andrew Spencer. 2012. Defining ‘periphrasis’: Key notions. Morphology 22.233–75.
36. Brown, Dunstan; Greville G. Corbett; and Carole Tiberius (eds.) 2003. Agreement: A typological perspective. (Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101.2.) Oxford: Blackwell.
37. Brown, Dunstan, and Andrew Hippisley. 2012. Network morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Browne, Wayles. 1993. Serbo-Croat. In Comrie & Corbett, 306–87.
39. Cardinaletti, Anna, and Giuliana Giusti. 2001. ‘Semi-lexical’ motion verbs in Romance and Germanic. Semi-lexical categories: The function of content words and the content of function words (Studies in generative grammar 59), ed. by Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdijk, 371–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
40. Cardinaletti, Anna, and Giuliana Giusti. 2003. Motion verbs as functional heads. The syntax of Italian dialects (Oxford studies in comparative syntax), ed. by Christina Tortora, 31–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70.737–88.
42. Cech, Petra, and Mozes F. Heinschnink. 1999. Sepečides-Romani: Grammatik, Texte und Glossar eines türksichen Romani-Dialekts. (Balkanologische Veröffentlichungen 34.)Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
43. Chiu, Bonnie Hui-Chun. 1987. The morphology of the Alabama set-I affixes. Muskogean linguistics (UCLA occasional papers in linguistics 6), ed. by Pamela Munro, 21–35. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.
44. Chumakina, Marina, and Greville G. Corbett. 2008. Archi: The challenge of an extreme agreement system. Fonetika i nefonetika: K 70-letiju Sandro V. Kodzasova, ed. by Aleksandr V. Arxipov, Leonid M. Zaxarov, Andrej A. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. Kibrik, Irina M. Kobozeva, Olʹga F. Krivnova, Ekaterina A. Ljutikova, and Olʹga V. Fëdorova, 184–94. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kulʹtur.
45. Chumakina, Marina, and Greville G. Corbett (eds.) 2013. Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms. (Proceedings of the British Academy 180.) Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.
46. Chumakina, Marina, and Greville G. Corbett. 2015. Gender-number marking in Archi: Small is complex. In Baerman et al. 2015, to appear.
47. Comrie, Bernard. 2003. When agreement gets trigger-happy. In Brown et al. 2003, 313–37.
48. Comrie, Bernard, and Greville G. Corbett (eds.) 1993. The Slavonic languages. London: Routledge.
49. Corbett, Greville G. 1993. The head of Russian numeral expressions. Heads in grammatical theory, ed. by Greville G. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser, and Scott McGlashan, 11–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Corbett, Greville G. 1999. Defectiveness, syncretism, suppletion, ‘deponency’: Four dimensions for a typology of inflectional systems. Paper presented at the 2nd Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Malta, September 1999.
51. Corbett, Greville G. 2003. Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. Topics in morphology: Selected papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, September 20–22, 2001), ed. by Geert Booij, Janet DeCesaris, Angela Ralli, and Sergio Scalise, 109–28. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Online: http://www3.surrey.ac.uk/LIS/SMG/corbett_publications.htm.
52. Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Corbett, Greville G. 2007a. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83.8–42.
54. Corbett, Greville G. 2007b. Deponency, syncretism and what lies betweenI. n Baerman et al. 2007, 21–43.
55. Corbett, Greville G. 2008. Determining morphosyntactic feature values: The case of case. Case and grammatical relations: Papers in honor of Bernard Comrie, ed. by Greville G. Corbett and Michael Noonan, 1–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Corbett, Greville G. 2009. Canonical inflectional classes. Selected proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux, 1–11. Online: http://www.lingref.com/cpp/decemb/6/abstract2231.html.
57. Corbett, Greville G. 2010. Classic problems at the syntax-morphology interface: Whose are they? Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG 2010), 255–68. Online: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/2010/.
58. Corbett, Greville G. 2011. The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems. Morphology (Special issue: Markedness and underspecification in the morphology and semantics of agreement, ed. by Jonathan Bobaljik, Uli Sauerland, and Andrew Nevins) 21.445–80.
59. Corbett, Greville G. 2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Corbett, Greville G. 2013a. Canonical morphosyntactic features. In Brown et al. 2013, 48–65.
60. Corbett, Greville G. 2013b. The unique challenge of the Archi paradigm. Berkeley Linguistics Society (Special session on languages of the Caucasus) 37.2.52–67. [Dated 2011 but published April 2013.] Online: http://elanguage.net/journals/bls/article/view/3626.
61. Corbett, Greville G. 2015. Morphomic splits. The morphome debate: Diagnosing and analysing morphomic patterns, ed. by Ana R. Luís and Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero. Oxford: Oxford University Press, to appear.
62. Corbett, Greville G., and Matthew Baerman. 2010. ‘Deep irregularity’: When the expected lexical splits follow the wrong pattern. Paper presented at the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, May 2010.
63. Corbett, Greville G., and Wayles Browne. 2009. Serbo-Croat: Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, Serbian (Ch. 18). The world’s major languages, 2nd edn., ed. by Bernard Comrie, 330–46. London: Routledge.
64. Corbett, Greville G., and Norman M. Fraser. 1993. Network morphology:ADATR account of Russian inflectional morphology. Journal of Linguistics 29.113–42. [Reprinted in Morphology: Critical concepts in linguistics, vol. 6. Morphology: Its place in the wider context, ed. by Francis X. Katamba, 364–96. London: Routledge, 2003.]
65. Corbett, Greville G., and Norman M. Fraser. 1997. Vyčislitelʹnaja lingvistika i tipologija. Vestnik MGU: Serija 9, Filologija 2, 122–40.
66. Cruschina, Silvio. 2013. Beyond the stem and inflectional morphology: An irregular pattern at the level of periphrasis. In Cruschina et al., 262–83.
67. Cruschina, Silvio; Martin Maiden; and John Charles Smith (eds.) 2013. The boundaries of pure morphology: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Cysouw, Michael. 2011. The expression of person and number:Atypologist’s perspective. Morphology (Special issue: Markedness and underspecification in the morphology and semantics of agreement, ed. by Jonathan Bobaljik, Uli Sauerland, and Andrew Nevins) 21.419–43.
69. Daniel, Michael, and Dmitri Ganenkov. 2009. Case marking in Daghestanian: Limits of elaboration. The Oxford handbook of case, ed. by Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer, 668–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. de Lacy, Paul, and John Kingston. 2013. Synchronic explanation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31.287–355.
70. Diamond, Jared. 1998. Guns, germs and steel: A short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years. London: Vintage.
71. Donohue, Mark. 2001. Animacy, class and gender in Burmeso. The boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton (Pacific linguistics 514), ed. by Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross, and Darrell Tryon, 97–115. Canberra: Australian National University.
72. Downing, Laura J.; T. Alan Hall; and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.) 2005. Paradigms in phonological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985. On the predictiveness of natural morphology. Journal of Linguistics 21.321–37.
74. Dwelly, Edward. 1902–1911. Faclair Gaidhlig: A Gaelic dictionary: Specially designed for beginners and for use in schools. Herne Bay: E. MacDonald and Co. at the Gaelic Press. Online: http://www.dwelly.info, accessed 25 April 2012.
75. Elšík, Viktor. 2000. Romani nominal paradigms: Their structure, diversity, and development. Grammatical relations in Romani: The noun phrase (Current issues in linguistic theory 211), ed. by Viktor Elšík and Yaron Matras, 9–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
76. Embick, David, and Morris Halle. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 2003, Nijmegen, 20–22 November, ed. by Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken, and Haike Jacobs, 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
77. Enger, Hans-Olav, and Greville G. Corbett. 2012. Definiteness, gender and hybrids: Evidence from Norwegian dialects. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 24.287–324.
78. Evans, Nicholas. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild: With historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
79. Evans, Nicholas. 2003. Typologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. In Brown et al. 2003, 203–34.
80. Evans, Nicholas. 2013. Some problems in the typology of quotation: A canonical approach. In Brown et al. 2013, 66–98.
81. Evans, Nicholas; Dunstan Brown; and Greville G. Corbett. 2001. Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism:Anetwork morphology analysis. Yearbook of Morphology 2000.187–231.
82. Evans, Roger, and Gerald Gazdar. 1996. DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22.167–216. Finley, Sara. 2009. Morphemic harmony as featural correspondence. Lingua 119.478–501.
83. Flemming, Edward. 2001. Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18.7–44.
84. Foley, William A. 2000. The languages of New Guinea. Annual Review of Anthropology 29.357–404.
85. Forker, Diana. 2012. The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46.75–108.
86. Fortin, Antonio. 2011. The morphology and semantics of expressive affixes. Oxford: University of Oxford dissertation.
87. Friedman, Victor A. 1993. Macedonian. In Comrie & Corbett, 249–305.
88. Gagliardia, Annie; Michael Goncalves; Maria Polinsky; and Nina Radkevich. 2013. The Nakh-Daghestian biabsolutive: Unity and diversity. Paper presented at the 10th biennial meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Leipzig, August 2013.
89. Graudina, Ljudmila K.; Viktor A. IckoviČ; and Lija P. Katlinskaja. 1976. Grammatičeskaja pravil′nost′ russkoj reči: Opyt častotno-stilističeskogo slovarja variantov. Moscow: Nauka.
90. Harley, Heidi, and Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A featuregeometric analysis. Language 78.482–526. Harris, Alice C. 1981. Georgian syntax: A study in relational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91. Harris, Alice C. 1985. Syntax and semantics, vol. 18: Diachronic syntax: The Kartvelian case. New York: Academic Press.
92. Harris, Alice C. 2008. On the explanation of typologically unusual structures. Linguistic universals and language change, ed. by Jeff Good, 54–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. Periphrasis. Morphologie/Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, vol. 1, ed. by Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, and Joachim Mugdan, in collaboration with Wolfgang Kesselheim and Stavros Skopeteas, 654–64.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
94. Haugen, Jason D., and Daniel Siddiqi. 2013. Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44.493–517.
95. Hayward, Richard J. 1998. Qafar (East Cushitic). The handbook of morphology, ed. by Andrew Spencer and Arnold M. Zwicky, 624–47. Oxford: Blackwell.
96. Hayward, Richard J., and Martin Orwin. 1991. The prefix conjugation in Qafar-Saho: The survival and revival of a paradigm, part 1. African Languages and Cultures 4.157–76.
97. Hewitt, B. George. 1995. Georgian: A structural reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier. 2011. Syncretism and suppletion in Gallo-Romance verb paradigms. In Maiden et al., 287–310.
98. Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences (Special issue: Data and theory: Papers in phonology in celebration of Charles W. Kisseberth, ed. by Michael J. Kenstowicz) 3.213–38.
99. Hyman, Larry M. 2011. In defense of prosodic typology:Aresponse to Beckman and Venditti. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2011), 200–235.
100. Ivanova, V. F. 1969. Čelovek s tysjač′ju lic ili čelovek s tysjač′ju licami? Russkij jazyk v škole 2.66–73.
101. Jakobson, Roman O. 1958. Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem (sostav russkix padežnyx form). American contributions to the fourth International Congress of Slavists, Moscow, September 1958, 127–56. The Hague: Mouton. [Reprinted in Selected writings, vol. 2: Word and language, 154–83. The Hague: Mouton, 1971. Translated as: Morphological observations on Slavic declension (the structure of Russian case forms). Roman Jakobson: Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981, ed. by Linda R. Waugh and Morris Halle, 105–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1984.]
102. Jamieson, Carol. 1982. Conflated subsystems marking person and aspect in Chiquihuitlán Mazatec. International Journal of American Linguistics 48.139–67.
103. Johnson, C. Douglas. 1972. Formal aspects of phonological description. The Hague: Mouton.
104. Kaye, Steven. 2013. Morphomic stems in the Northern Talyshi verb: Diachrony and synchrony. In Cruschina et al., 181–208.
105. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1977. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka, vol. 3: Dinamičeskaja grammatika. (Publikacii otdelenija strukturnoj i prikladnoj lingvistiki 13.) Moscow: Izdatel′stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.
106. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1994. Archi. Indigenous languages of the Caucasus, vol. 4: North East Caucasian languages. Part 2: Presenting the three Nakh languages and six minor Lezgian languages, ed. by Rieks Smeets, 297–365. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.
107. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 2003a. Nominal inflection galore: Daghestanian, with side glances at Europe and the world. Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe, ed. by Frans Plank, 37–112. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
108. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 2003b. Konstanty i peremennye jazyka. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia. Kibrik, Aleksandr E., and Sandro V. Kodzasov. 1990. Sopostavitel′noe izučenie dagestanskix jazykov: Imja: Fonetika. Moscow: MGU.
109. Kibrik, Andrej A. 2013. Peculiarities and origins of the Russian referential system. Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, ed. by Dik Bakker and Martin Haspelmath, 227–62. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
110. Kim, Yuni. 2010. Phonological and morphological conditions on affix order in Huave. Morphology 20.133–63.
111. Konstantopoulos, Stasinos. 1998. A morphological analyser for Scottish Gaelic. Edinburgh: Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh master’s thesis.
112. Krasovitsky, Alexander; Alison Long; Matthew Baerman; Dunstan Brown; and Greville G. Corbett. 2008. Predicate nouns in Russian. Russian Linguistics 32.99–113.
113. L’Hermitte, René. 1978. La phrase nominale en russe. Paris: Institut d’études slaves.
114. Lamb, William. 2001. Scottish Gaelic. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
115. Lamb, William. 2008. Scottish Gaelic speech and writing: Register variation in an endangered language. (Belfast studies in language, culture and politics 16.) Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.
116. LetuČij, Aleksandr B. 2013. Svojstva nulevoj svjazki v russkom jazyke v sopostavlenii so svojstvami vyražennogo glagola. Moscow: Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, ms.
117. Luís, Ana R. 2011. Morphomic structure and loan-verb integration: Evidence from Lusophone Creoles. In Maiden et al., 235–54.
118. Mač'Avariani [Machavariani], Givi I. 1974. Asp’ekt’is k’at’egoria kartvelur enebši [The category of aspect in the Kartvelian languages]. Kartvelur Enata St’rukt’uris Sak’itxebi 4.118–41. [Cited from Harris 1985.]
119. Mackinnon, Donald. 1910. Traces of the neuter gender in modern Scottish Gaelic. Celtic Review 6.24.296–304.
120. Maiden, Martin. 2004. When lexemes become allomorphs—On the genesis of suppletion. Folia Linguistica 38.227–56.
121. Maiden, Martin. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology 2004.137–75.
122. Maiden, Martin. 2009. From pure phonology to pure morphology: The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 38.45–82. Online: http://rlv.revues.org/1765.
123. Maiden, Martin. 2011. Morphomes and ‘stress-conditioned allomorphy’ in Romansh. In Maiden et al., 36–50.
124. Maiden, Martin. 2013. The Latin ‘third stem’ and its Romance descendants. Diachronica 30.492–530.
125. Maiden, Martin, and Paul O’Neill. 2010. On morphomic defectiveness: Evidence from the Romance languages of the Iberian Peninsula. In Baerman et al. 2010, 103–24.
126. Maiden, Martin; John Charles Smith; Maria Goldbach; and Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.) 2011. Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
127. Mark, Colin. 2003. The Gaelic-English dictionary. London: Routledge. Marslen-Wilson, William D. 2007. Morphological processes in language comprehension. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Gareth Gaskell, 175–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128. Matthews, P. H. 1972. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
129. McGinnis, Martha. 2005. On markedness asymmetries in person and number. Language 81.699–718.
130. McShane, Marjorie. 2009. Subject ellipsis in Polish and Russian. Studia Linguistica 63.98–132.
131. MelʹČuk, Igor. 1993. Cours de morphologie générale (théorique et descriptive), vol. 1: Introduction et première partie: Le mot. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
132. MelʹČuk, Igor. 1996. Cours de morphologie générale (théorique et descriptive), vol. 3: Troisième partie: Moyens morphologiques; Quatrième partie: Syntactiques morphologiques. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
133. Meyer, Peter. 1994. Grammatical categories and the methodology of linguistics: Review article on van Helden 1993. Russian Linguistics 18.341–77.
134. Müller, Gereon. 2011. Syncretism without underspecification: The role of leading forms. Word Structure 4.1.53–103.
135. Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection. The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. by Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume, and Keren Rice, 2357–82. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.
136. Nikolaeva, Irina. 2013. Unpacking finiteness. In Brown et al. 2013, 99–122.
137. Nikolaeva, Irina, and Andrew Spencer. 2008. Nouns as adjectives and adjectives as nouns. London: University of London, SOAS, and Colchester: University of Essex, ms. Online: http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~spena/PossMod/8adjnoun-language-revised -final-non-anon.pdf.
138. NikoliĆ, Miroslav B. 2013. Imenice koje u srpskom književnom jeziku proširuju osnovu morfemom -ov- u množini. Južnoslovenski fililog 69.277–318.
139. O’Neill, Paul. 2011. The notion of the morphome. In Maiden et al., 70–94.
140. O’Neill, Paul. 2013. The morphome and morphosyntactic/semantic features. In Cruschina et al., 221–46.
141. Opitz, Andreas; Stefanie Regel; Gereon Müller; and Angela D. Friederici. 2013. Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection. Language 89.231–64.
142. Paciaroni, Tania. 2012. Noun inflectional classes in Maceratese. Inflection and word formation in Romance languages, ed. by Sascha Gaglia and Marc-Olivier Hinzelin, 231–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
143. Palancar, Enrique. 2012. The conjugation classes of Tilapa Otomi: An approach from canonical typology. Linguistics 50.783–832.
144. Paster, Mary. 2009. Explaining phonological conditions on affixation: Evidence from suppletive allomorphy and affix ordering. Word Structure 2.1.18–47.
145. Polinsky, Maria. 2003. Non-canonical agreement is canonical. In Brown et al. 2003, 279–312. Priestly, T. M. S. 1993. Slovene. In Comrie & Corbett, 388–451.
146. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical report 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, and Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder. [ROA 537, 2002. Revised publication, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.]
147. Reh, Mechthild. 1985. Die Krongo-Sprache (Nìinò Mó-Dì): Beschreibung, Texte, Wörterverzeichnis. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
148. Ross, Malcolm. 2005. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples (Pacific linguistics 572), ed. by Andrew Pawley
149. Robert Attenborough, Robin Hide, and Jack Golson, 15–66. Canberra: Australian National University.
150. Round, Erich R. 2009. Kayardild morphology, phonology and morphosyntax. New Haven, CT: Yale University dissertation.
151. Round, Erich R. 2013. Kayardild morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Round, Erich R. 2015.
152. Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes and metamorphomes. In Baerman et al. 2015, to appear.
153. Rucart, Pierre. 2006. Morphologie gabaritique et interface phonosyntaxique: Aspects de la morphologie verbale en afar. Paris: Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7) dissertation.
154. SANU (Srpska Akademija Nauka i Umetnosti). 1959. Rečnik srpskohrvatskog književnog i narodnog jezika. Belgrade: SANU.
155. Schmidt, Karl H. 1963. Zu den Aspekten im Georgischen und in indogermanischen Sprachen. Bedi Kartlisa 15–16.107–15.
156. Schmidt, Karl H. 1966. Tempora im Georgischen und in indogermanischen Sprachen. Studia Caucasica 2.48–57.
157. Seifart, Frank. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). Nijmegen: Radboud University, Nijmegen dissertation.
158. Siemund, Peter, and Florian Dolberg. 2011. From lexical to referential gender: An analysis of gender change in medieval English based on two historical documents. Folia Linguistica 45.489–534.
159. Smith, John Charles. 2013. The morphome as a gradient phenomenon: Evidence from Romance. In Cruschina et al., 247–61.
160. Spencer, Andrew. 2003. Periphrastic paradigms in Bulgarian. Syntactic structures and morphological information (Interface explorations 7), ed. by Uwe Junghanns and Luka Szucsich, 249–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
161. Spencer, Andrew. 2007. Extending deponency: Implications for morphological mismatches. In Baerman et al. 2007, 45–70.
162. Spencer, Andrew. 2012. Identifying stems. In Bonami 2012b, 88–108.
163. Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical relatedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
164. Stanislav, Ján. 1977. Slowakische Grammatik. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.
165. Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
166. Stump, Gregory T. 2006. Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language 82.279–322.
167. Stump, Gregory T. 2007. A non-canonical pattern of deponency and its implications. In Baerman et al. 2007, 71–95.
168. Stump, Gregory T. 2009. Cells and paradigms in inflectional semantics. Theory and evidence in semantics, ed. by Erhard W. Hinrichs and John Nerbonne, 215–33. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
169. Stump, Gregory T. 2012. The formal and functional architecture of inflectional morphology. Online proceedings of the Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 8.255–71. Online: http://www3.lingue.unibo.it/mmm2/?page_id=456.
170. Stump, Gregory T. 2013. Periphrasis in the Sanskrit verb system. In Chumakina & Corbett 2013, 105–38.
171. Stump, Gregory T., and Raphael A. Finkel. 2013. Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
172. Suthar, Babubhai Kohyabhai. 2006. Agreement in Gujarati. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
173. Swan, Oscar. 2012. Why budu? Почему буду? Russian Linguistics 36.305–18.
174. Taylor, Catherine. 2012. Formal relationships in the paradigm: A functional approach with a focus on the Romance verb. Colchester: University of Essex dissertation.
175. Thornton, Anna M. 2010–2011. La non canonicita del tipo it. Braccio//braccia/bracci: Sovrabbondanza, difettivita o iperdifferenziazione? Studi di grammatical italiana 29– 30.419–77.
176. Thornton, Anna M. 2011a. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Maiden et al., 358–81.
177. Thornton, Anna M. 2011b. Overabundance: A non-canonical phenomenon in morphology. L’Aquila: Universita degli Studi dell’Aquila, ms.
178. Tosco, Mauro. 2001. The Dhaasanac language: Grammar, texts, vocabulary of a Cushitic language of Ethiopia. (Cushitic language studies 17.) Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
179. Trommer, Jochen (ed.) 2012. The morphology and phonology of exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
180. Trompelt, Helena; Denisa Bordag; and Thomas Pechmann. 2013. (Ir)regularity of verbs revisited: Evidence for lexical entry complexity. The Mental Lexicon 8.26–52.
181. Van de Velde Mark. 2013. The Bantu connective construction. The genitive (Case and grammatical relations across languages 5), ed. by Anne Carlier and Jean-Christophe Verstraete, 217–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
182. van Helden, W. Andries. 1993. Case and gender: Concept formation between morphology and syntax. (Studies in Slavic and general linguistics 20.) 2 vols. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
183. Verkuyl, Henk; Co Vet; Andrée Borillo; Myriam Bras; Anne Le Draoulec; Arie Molendijk; Henriëtte de Swart; Carl Vetters; and Laure Vieu. 2004. Tense and aspect in sentences. Handbook of French semantics, ed. by Francis Corblin and Henriëtte de Swart, 233–70. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
184. Vincent, Nigel. 2011. Non-finite forms, periphrases, and autonomous morphology in Latin and Romance. In Maiden et al., 417–35.
185. Walther, Géraldine. 2013. Sur la canonicité en morphologie: Perspective empirique, formelle et computationnelle. Paris: Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7) dissertation.
186. Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2011. Typological variation in grammatical relations. Leipzig: University of Leipzig dissertation.
187. Worth, Dean S. 1984. Russian gen2, loc2 revisited. Signs of friendship: To honour A. G. F. van Holk, Slavist, linguist, semiotician, ed. by Joost J. van Baak, 295–306. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
188. Xalilov, Madžid Š. 1985. Ob ograničennom množestvennom čisle suščestvitel′nyx bežtinskogo jazyka. Kategorija čisla v dagestanskix jazykax: Sbornik statej, ed. by K. Š. Mikailov, 136–43. Makhachkala: Dagestanskij filial AN SSSR.
189. Xu, Zheng, and Mark Aronoff. 2011.Arealizational optimality-theoretic approach to full and partial identity of forms. In Maiden et al., 257–86.
190. Yu, Alan C. L. 2007. A natural history of infixation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
191. Zaliznjak, Andrej A. 1973. O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax. Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija, ed. by Andrej A. Zaliznjak, 53–87. Moscow: Nauka. [Reprinted as Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie: S priloženiem izbrannyx rabot po sovremennomu russkomu jazyku i obščemu jazykoznaniju, ed. by Andrej A. Zaliznjak, 613–47. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul′tury, 2002.]
192. Žirkov, L. I. 1955. Lakskij jazyk: Fonetika i morfologija. Moscow: AN SSSR.