Morphological stems: what William of Ockham really said1

Word Structure

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-51

  Aronoff, Mark ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136999093     PISSN: 17501245     EISSN: 17552036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/word.2012.0018     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albright, Adam 2005. The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.) Paradigms in phonological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 17–43.
2. Albright, Adam 2008. Inflectional paradigms have bases too. In Andrew Nevins & Asaf Bachrach (eds.), The Bases of inflectional identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 271–312.
3. Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Aronoff, Mark 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Aronoff, Mark 2007. In the beginning was the word. Language 83: 803–830.
6. Aronoff, Mark & Nanna Fuhrhop 2002. Restricting suffix combinations in German and English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–490.
7. Bonami, Olivier, Gilles Boyé, Helene Giraudo & Madeleine Voga. 2008. Quels verbes sont réguliers en français? In Actes du premier Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. 1511–1523.
8. Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé 2002. Suppletion and dependency in inflectional morphology. In The Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications. 51–70.
9. Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé 2003. Supplétion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugaison du français. Langages 152: 102–126.
10. Boyé, Gilles 2000. Problèmes de morphophonologie verbale en français, espagnol et italien. Thèse de l’Université Paris 7.
11. nd edition). Vol. 12. Boston: Elsevier. 297–299.
12. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew 1994. Suppletion. In R.E. Asher & J.M.Y. Simpson (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. vol. 8. Oxford: Pergamon. 4410–11.
13. Chafe, Wallace. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Corbett, Greville G. & Norman M. Fraser 1993. Network morphology: a DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29: 113–142.
15. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
16. Embick, David & Morris Halle 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–31.
17. Embick, David & Alec Marantz 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 1–53.
18. Evans, Roger & Gerald Gazdar 1996. DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22: 167–216.
19. Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2007. Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology 17: 39–75.
20. Grévisse, Maurice & André Goosse 1980. Nouvelle grammaire française. Paris: Duculot.
21. Iatridou, Sabine 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 231–270.
22. Jakobson, Roman 1984/1958. Morphological observations on Slavic declension (the structure of Russian case forms). In Linda Waugh & Morris Halle (eds.), Russian and Slavic grammar: studies 1931–1981. Berlin: Mouton. 105–132.
23. Johnson, C. Douglas 1972. Formal aspects of phonological description. The Hague: Mouton.
24. Kilani-Schoch, Marianne & Wolfgang Dressler 2005. Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
25. Lounsbury, Floyd 1966/1953. The method of descriptive morphology. In Martin Joos (ed.), Readings in linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 379–385. (extracted from Oneida verb morphology. 1953. Yale University Publications in Anthropology no. 48).
26. Maiden, Martin 1992. Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics 28: 285–312.
27. Maiden, Martin 2011. Morphophonological innovation. In M. Maiden, J.C. Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages. Vol I. Structures. 216–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Matthews, P. H. 1993. Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. McCarthy, John & Alan Prince 1994. The emergence of the unmarked:optimality in prosodic morphology. Proceedings of NELS 24. 333–379.
31. Mel’čuk, Igor 1994. Suppletion: towards a logical analysis of the concept. Studies in Language 18: 339–410.
32. Mel’čuk, Igor 2000. Suppletion. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An international handbook on inflection and word-formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 510–522.
33. Myhill, John 2001. Suppletion, lexical meaning, semantic primitives, and translation data. Linguistics 39: 761–802.
34. Plénat, Marcel 1987. Morphologie du passé simple et du passé composé des verbes de l’ “autre” conjugaison. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 77–78: 93–150.
35. Spade, Paul Vincent 2008. William of Ockham. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/ockham/>.
36. Stump, Gregory 2001. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Thorburn, William. M. 1918. The myth of Occam’s razor. Mind 27(107). 345–353.
38. Veselinova, Ljuba N. 2006. Suppletion in verb paradigms: bits and pieces of the puzzle. Amsterdam: Benjamins.