Defining 'periphrasis': Key notions

Morphology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 233-275

  Brown, Dunstan ^a   Chumakina, Marina ^a   Corbett, Greville ^a   Popova, Gergana ^b   Spencer, Andrew ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Canonical Typology; Inflectional morphology; Periphrasis; Syntax

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861496640     PISSN: 18715621     EISSN: 18715656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11525-012-9201-5     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ackerman, F. (2000). Lexical constructions: Paradigms and periphrastic expressions. Paper read at the LFG workshop on Morphosyntax.
2. Ackerman F., Stump G., Webelhuth G. (2011) Lexicalism, periphrasis and implicative morphology. In: Borsley R., Börjars K. (eds) Non-transformational syntax: Formal and explicit models of grammar. Blackwell, Oxford.
3. Ackerman F., Stump G. T. (2004) Paradigms and periphrastic expression: A study in realizationbased lexicalism. In: Sadler L., Spencer A. (eds) Projecting morphology. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford CA, pp 111-158.
4. Ackerman F., Webelhuth G. (1998) A theory of predicates. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA.
5. Aikhenvald, A., Dixon, R. M. W., Dixon, R. M. W. (eds) (2006) Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Anderson G. D. S. (2006) Auxiliary verb constructions. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Bach E. (1988) Categorial grammars as theories of language. In: Oehrle R., Bach E., Wheeler D. (eds) Categorial grammars and natural language structures. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 17-34.
8. Baerman M., Brown D., Corbett G. G. (2005) The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Bonami O., Samvelian P. (2009) Inflectional periphrasis in Persian. In: Müller S. (ed) Proceedings of the HPSG 2009 conference. CSLI, Stanford, pp 26-46.
10. Bonami, O., & Webelhuth, G. (forthcoming). The phrase-structural diversity of periphrasis: A lexicalist account. In M. Chumakina & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press.
11. Booij G. (1996) Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In: Booij G., Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1995. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1-15.
12. Börjars K. (1998) Feature distribution in Swedish noun phrases. Blackwell, Oxford.
13. Börjars K., Vincent N., Chapman C. (1997) Paradigms, pronominal inflection and periphrasis. In: Booij G., Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 155-180.
14. Bresnan J. (2001) Lexical functional syntax. Blackwell, Oxford.
15. Bybee J. L., Perkins R. D., Pagliuca W. (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Comrie B. (2003) agreement gets trigger-happy. In: Brown D., Corbett G. G., Tiberius C. (eds) Agreement: A typological perspective Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101, no. 2. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 313-337.
17. Corbett G. G. (2003) Agreement: the range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. In: Brown D., Corbett G. G., Tiberius C. (eds) Agreement: A typological perspective Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101 no. 2. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 155-202.
18. Corbett G. G. (2006) Agreement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Corbett G. G. (2007) Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83: 8-42.
20. Corbett G. G. (2008) Determining morphosyntactic feature values: The case of case. In: Corbett G. G., Noonan M. (eds) Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 1-34.
21. Corbett, G. G. (2010a). Features: Essential notions. In A. Kibort & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics (pp. 17-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Corbett G. G. (2010b) Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3: 141-155.
23. Corbett, G. G. (forthcoming). Periphrasis and possible lexemes. In M. Chumakina & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press.
24. Corbett, G. G., Fraser, N. M., McGlashan, S. (eds) (1993) Heads in grammatical theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Delsing, L. (1993). The internal structure of noun phrases in the Scandinavian languages. PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
26. Enfield N. J. (2007) A grammar of Lao. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
27. Evans N. (1995) A grammar of Kayardild. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
28. Evans N. (2003) Typologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. In: Brown D., Corbett G. G., Tiberius C. (eds) Agreement: A typological perspective Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101 no. 2. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 203-234.
29. Everaert, M., Linden, E-J., Schenk, A., Schreuder, R. (eds) (1995) Idioms Structural and psychological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
30. Hankamer J., Mikkelsen L. (2002) A morphological analysis of definite nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 137-175.
31. Hankamer J., Mikkelsen L. (2005) When movement must be blocked: A reply to Embick and Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 85-125.
32. Hankamer J., Mikkelsen L. (2008) Definiteness marking and the structure of Danish pseudopartitives. Journal of Linguistics 44: 317-346.
33. Haspelmath, M. (2000). Periphrasis. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphology: A handbook on inflection and word formation (pp. 654-664). Berlin: de Gruyter.
34. Heck F., Müller G., Trommer J. (2008) A phase-based approach to Scandinavian definiteness marking. In: Chang C. B., Haynie H. J. (eds) Proceedings of the 26th West Coast conference on formal linguistics. Cascadilla, Somerville, MA, pp 226-233.
35. Heine B., Kuteva T. (2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Honda, I. (1996). Negation: A cross-linguistic study. PhD thesis, University of Buffalo.
37. Hudson R. A. (1987) Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics 23: 109-132.
38. Julien M. (2005) Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
39. Kahrel, P. (1996). Aspects of negation. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
40. Matthews P. H. (1974) Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Matthews P. H. (2007) Syntactic relations: A critical survey. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Nerbonne J. (1996) Computational semantics-Linguistics and processing. In: Lappin S. (eds) The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 461-484.
43. Nikolaeva, I. (forthcoming). Periphrasis in Nenets. In M. Chumakina & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.
44. Nikolaeva, I., & Spencer, A. (2008). Nouns as adjectives and adjectives as nouns. ms.
45. Nunberg G., Sag I. A., Wasow T. (1994) Idioms. Language 70: 491-538.
46. Plank, F. (1994). Inflection and derivation. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 1671-1678). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
47. Polinsky, M. (2003). Non-canonical agreement is canonical. In D. Brown, G. G. Corbett, & C. Tiberius (Eds.), Agreement: A typological perspective. Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101 no. 2 (pp. 279-312). Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Popova G. (2010) Features in periphrastic constructions. In: Kibort A., Corbett G. G. (eds) Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 166-184.
49. Popova, G., & Spencer, A. (forthcoming). Relatedness in periphrasis: A paradigm-based perspective. In M. Chumakina & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press.
50. Poser W. J. (1992) Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items. In: Sag I., Szabolcsi A. (eds) Lexical matters. CSLI, Stanford, CA, pp 111-130.
51. Rosch E. (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328-335.
52. Rounds C. (2001) Hungarian. An essential grammar. Routledge, London.
53. Sadler L., Spencer A. (2001) Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. In: Booij G., Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2000. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 71-96.
54. Salminen, T. (1997). Tundra Nenets inflection. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne (Vol. 227), Helsinki.
55. Scatton E. (1984) A reference grammar of modern Bulgarian. Slavica Publishers, Columbus, OH.
56. Seifart, F. (2005). The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraã (North West Amazon). PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
57. Spencer A. (2001) The paradigm-based model of morphosyntax. Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 279-313.
58. Spencer A. (2003) Periphrastic paradigms in Bulgarian. In: Junghanns U., Szucsich L. (eds) Syntactic structures and morphological information. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 249-282.
59. Spencer, A. (2007). Extending deponency. In M. Baerman, G. G. Corbett, D. Brown, & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches (pp. 45-70). Proceedings of the British Academy, 145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Spencer A. (2008) Negation in Japanese: A case of morphosyntactic mismatch. Lingua 118: 997-1017.
61. Spencer, A. (ms.). Sentence negation and periphrasis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Essex.
62. Stump G. T. (1998) Inflection. In: Spencer A., Zwicky A. M. (eds) Handbook of morphology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 13-43.
63. Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge studies in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Stump G. T. (2005) Word-formation and inflectional morphology. In: Štekauer P., Lieber R. (eds) Handbook of word-formation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 49-71.
65. Stump G. T. (2006) Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language 82: 279-322.
66. Stump, G. T., & Finkel, R. (2008). Stem alternations and principal parts in French verb inflection. Paper presented at Décembrettes 6: Colloque International de Morphologie, "Morphologie et classes flexionnelles", December 4-5, 2008. France: Université de Bordeaux.
67. Suthar, B. K. (2006). Agreement in Gujarati. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
68. Thornton, A. (2008). A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology: Double forms realizing the same cell. Paper read at the first Oxford workshop on Romance verb morphology, 27-28 August 2008, Oxford.
69. Thornton A. et al (2011) Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In: Goldbach M. (ed) Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 362-385.
70. Toivonen, I. (2003). Non-projecting words: A case study of Swedish particles. In Studies in natural language and linguistic theory 58. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
71. Vet, C. (2007). The descriptive inadequacy of Reichenbach's tense system: A new proposal. In L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler, & G. Puskas (Eds.), Tense, Mood and aspect: Theoretical and descriptive issues (pp. 7-26). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
72. Westney P. (1995) Modals and periphrastics in English. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen.
73. Zwicky A. M. (1985) Clitics and particles. Language 61(2): 283-305.