The conjugation classes of Tilapa Otomi: An approach from canonical typology

Linguistics

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 783-832

  Palancar, Enrique L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870233169     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling-2012-0025     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Andrews, Henrietta. 1993. The function of verb prefixes in Southwestern Otomí (Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 115). Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.
3. de Angulo, Jaime. 1932. The Chichimeco language (Central Mexico). International Journal of American Linguistics 7. 152-193.
4. Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bartholomew, Doris. 2004. Notas sobre la gramática. In Luis Hernández Cruz, Moisés Victoria Torquemada & Donaldo Sinclair Crawford (eds.), Diccionario del hñähñu (otomí) del Valle del Mezquital, Estado de Hidalgo (Vocabularios Indígenas 45), 473-495. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
7. Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon), 169-240. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Blevins, James. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(3). 531-573.
9. Blevins, Juliette. 2005. Yurok verb classes. International Journal of American Linguistics 71(3). 327-349.
10. Brown, Dunstan, Carole Tiberius, Marina Chumakina, Greville G. Corbett & Alexander Krasovitsky. 2009. Databases designed for investigating specific phenomena. In Martin Everaert, Simon Musgrave & Alexis Dimitriadis (eds.), The use of databases in cross-linguistic studies (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 41). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. de Cárceres, Fray Pedro. 1907 [1580]. Arte de la lengua Othomi. Edited by Nicolás León. Boletín del Instituto Bibliográfico Mexicano 6. 38-155.
12. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1998. Paradigmatic structure: inflectional paradigms and morphological classes. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 322-334. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. CLIN (Catálogo de las Lenguas Indígenas Nacionales): Variantes lingüísticas de México con sus autodenominaciones y referencias geoestadísticas. 2008. Diario de la Nación (14-01-2008).
14. Mexico DF. http://www.inali.gob.mx/pdf/CLIN-completo.pdf.
15. Comrie, Bernard. 2003. When agreement gets trigger-happy. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 313-337.
16. Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, David Rood & Adam Hodges (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25-49. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
17. Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83. 8-42.
19. Corbett, Greville G. 2009. Canonical inflectional classes. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th décembrettes, 1-11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/decemb/6/index.html.
20. Corbett, Greville & Matthew Baerman. 2006. Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features. Morphology 16. 231-246.
21. Donohue, Mark. 2001. Animacy, class and gender in Burmeso. Pacific Linguistics 514. 95-115.
22. Echegoyen, Artemisa & Katherine Voigtlander. 2007. Diccionario yuhú: Otomí de la Sierra Madre Oriental (Estados de Hidalgo, Puebla y Veracruz, México) (Vocabularios Indígenas: Preliminary version). Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
23. Evans, Nicholas. 2003. Typologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 203-234.
24. Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump. 2009. Principal parts and degrees of paradigmatic transparency. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 13-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Hekking, Ewald. 1995. El otomí de Santiago Mexquititlán: Desplazamiento lingüístico, préstamos y cambios gramaticales (Studies in Language and Language Use 17). Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.
26. Hernández Cruz, Luis, Moisés Victoria Torquemada & Donaldo Sinclair Crawford (eds.). 2004. Diccionario del hñähñu (otomí) del Valle de Mezquital, Estado de Hidalgo (Vocabularios Indígenas 45). Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
27. Hess, H. Harwood. 1968. The syntactic structure of Mezquital Otomi (Janua Linguarum Series Practica 43). The Hague: Mouton.
28. Kaufman, Terrence. 1990. The reconstruction of TAM in Proto Oto-Manguean. Unpublished ms.
29. Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
30. Lastra, Yolanda. 1997. El otomí de Ixtenco. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Autónoma Nacional de México.
31. Lastra, Yolanda. 2001. Unidad y diversidad de la lengua: Relatos otomíes. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Autónoma Nacional de México.
32. Maiden, Martin. 1992. Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics 28(2). 285-312.
33. Maiden, Martin. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology 2004. 137-175.
34. Pace, Wanda Jane. 1990. Comaltepec Chinantec verb inflection. In William R. Merrifield & Calvin R. Rensch (eds.), Syllables, tones and verb paradigms (Studies in Chinantec Languages 4), 21-62. Arlington, Texas: The Summer Linguistic Institute and the University of Texas at Arlington.
35. Palancar, Enrique L. 2006. Middle voice and intransitivity in Otomi. Linguistics 43(1). 613-643.
36. Palancar, Enrique L. 2009a. Gramática y textos del hñöñhö: Otomí de San Ildefonso Tultepec, vol. I: Gramática. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés.
37. Palancar, Enrique L. 2009b. The TAM morphology in Tilapa Otomi verb conjugations. Paper presented at Morphology of the World's Languages I, University of Leipzig, 11-13 June.
38. Palancar, Enrique L. 2011. The conjugations of Colonial Otomi. Transactions of the Philological Society 109. 1-19.
39. Polinsky, Maria. 2003. Non-canonical agreement is canonical. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 279-312.
40. Smith-Stark, Thomas C. 2002. Las clases verbales del zapoteco de Chichicapan. In Rosa María Ortiz Ciscomani & Zarina Estrada Fernández (eds.), VI Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste: Memorias, vol. 2, 165-212. Hermosillo, Sonora: UniSON.
41. Spencer, Andrew. 2005. Extending deponency. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches (Proceedings of the British Academy 145), 45-70. Oxford: British Academy & Oxford University Press.
42. Stump, Gregory T. 2005. A non-canonical pattern of deponency and its implications. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches (Proceedings of the British Academy 145), 71-95. Oxford: British Academy & Oxford University Press.
43. Stump, Gregory and Raphael Finkel. 2007. Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology 17. 39-75.
44. Thornton, Anna M. 2010. Towards a typology of overabundance. Paper presented at Décembrettes 7: International Conference on Morphology, University of Toulouse, 2-3 December.
45. Thornton, Anna M. 2011. "Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): a non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology". In Maiden, Martin, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, 358-381.
46. Voigtlander, Katherine & Artemisa Echegoyen. 1979. Luces contemporáneas del otomí. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
47. Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1989 [1984]. Inflectional morphology and naturalness (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory). Translated by Manfred Schentke. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
48. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.