The Latin 'third stem' and its Romance descendants

Diachronica

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 492-530

  Maiden, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Iconicity; Latin; Morphomes; Past participle; Romance; Romanian; Supine

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893341117     PISSN: 01764225     EISSN: 15699714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/dia.30.4.03mai     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anttila, Raimo 1989. Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Atanasov, Petar. 2002. Meglenoromâna astǎ;zi. Bucharest: Editura Academiei
4. Benveniste, Emile. 1948. Noms d'agent et noms d'action en indoeuropéen. Paris: Adrien- Maisonneuve.
5. Benveniste, Emile. 1966. « Être » et « avoir » dans leurs fonctions linguistiques, in Emile Benvéniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale 1, 187-207. Paris : Gallimard.
6. Benucci, Franco. 1993. Temporal periphrasis and clitics in Central Romance Languages. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 51-83.
7. Bonfadini, Giovanni. 1987. Il dialetto della Valle Imagna. In Glauco Sanga (ed.), Lingua e dialetto di Bergamo e delle valli, 435-477. Bergamo: Lubrina.
8. Brâncuş, Grigore 1967. O concordanţǎ; gramaticalǎ; româno-albanezǎ;: modul supin. Limbǎ; şi literaturǎ; romanǎ; 13. 99.
9. Brepolis = Brepolis Library of Latin Texts at http://clt.brepolis.net/ cds/pages/Search.aspx.
10. Brero, Camillo & Remo Bertodatti. 1988. Grammatica della lingua piemontese. Turin: Piemont/ Europa.
11. Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Carabulea, Elena & Magdalena Popescu-Marin. 1967. Exprimarea numelui de acţiune prin substantive cu formǎ; de infinitiv lung şi de supin. Studii şi materiale privitoare la formarea cuvintelor în limba românǎ; 4. 277-333.
13. Caragiu-Marioţeanu, Matilda. 1962. Moduri nepersonale. Studii şi cercetǎ;ri lingvistice 13. 29-43.
14. Caragiu-Marioţeanu, Matilda. 1968. Fono-morfologie aromânǎ;. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.
15. Chagas de Souza, Paulo. 2007. Athematic participles in Brazilian Portuguese: A syncretism in the making. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54. 119-128.
16. Clark, Eve. 1987. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 1-33. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Clark, Eve. 1993. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Davis, Norman. 1978. Sweet's Anglo-Saxon primer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. De Melo, Wolfgang. 2007. The Early Latin verb system: Archaic forms in Plautus, Terence, and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. DEX = 1998. Dicţionar explicativ al limbii române. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic.
21. Dimitriu, Corneliu. 1999. Tratat de gramaticǎ; a limbii române. Morfologia. Iaşi, Romania: Institutul European.
22. Donovetsky, Ohara. 2007. Forme şi valori ale supinului în graiurile muntenesti actuale. Foneticǎ; şi dialectologie 24-26. 67-73.
23. Dragomirescu, Adina. 2012. Vechimea şi evoluţia supinului cu la'. Studii şi cercetǎ;ri lingvistice 62. 173-184.
24. Dressler, Wolfgang, Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang Wurzel (eds.). 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Embick, David & Morris Halle. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 270), 37-62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Ernout, Alfred. 1927. Morphologie historique du latin. Paris: Klincksieck.
27. Farcaş, Ioan-Mircea. 2009. Fonomorfologia subdialectului maramureşean. Nuremberg: Druckzentrum.
28. Fortson, Benjamin. 2007. The origin of the Latin future active participle. In Alan Nussbaum (ed.), Verba docenti. Studies in historical and Indo-European linguistics presented to Jay H. Jasanoff by students, colleagues, and friends, 83-95. Ann Arbor, MI: Beech Stave Press.
29. Graur, Alexandru. 1968. Tendinţele actuale ale limbii române. Bucharest: Editura ştiinţificǎ;.
30. Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Hock, Hans Henrich. 2003. Analogical change. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.). The handbook of historical linguistics, 440-460. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Juge, Matthew L. 1999. On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms. In Steve Chang, Lily Liaw & Josef Ruppenhofer (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 183-194. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
33. La Fauci, Nunzio. 2000. Forme romanze della funzione predicativa. Pisa: ETS.
34. Lass, Roger 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Laurent, Richard. 1999. Past participles from Latin to Romance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Ledgeway, Adam. 2000. A comparative syntax of the dialects of southern Italy: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
37. Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
38. Leone, Alfonso. 1980. La morfologia del verbo nelle parlate della Sicilia sud-orientale. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.
39. Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Munich: Beck.
40. Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Sintassi comparata dell'accordo participiale romanzo. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
41. Loporcaro, Michele, Lorenza Pescia & Maria Ana Ramos. 2004. Costrutti dipendenti participiali e participi doppi in portoghese. Revue de Linguistique Romane 68. 15-46.
42. Maiden, Martin. 2001. A strange affinity: 'Perfecto y tiempos afines'. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 58. 441-464.
43. Maiden, Martin. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004, 137-175. Amsterdam: Springer.
44. Maiden, Martin. 2009. Un capitolo di morfologia storica del romeno: preterito e tempi affini. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 125. 273-309.
45. Maiden, Martin. 2011. Morphophonological innovation. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith and Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, 216-267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Maria Savoia. 2007. A unification of morphology and syntax: Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge.
47. Marcu, Traian. 1960. Material dialectal I. Glosar dialectal din comuna Deda. In Romulus Todoran & Vasile Breban (eds.), Materiale şi cercetǎ;ri dialectale, 143-199. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.
48. Marin, Maria, Iulia Mǎ;rgǎ;rit & Victorela Neagoe. 1998. Graiurile româneşti din Ucraina şi Republica Moldova. Foneticǎ; şi dialectologie 17. 69-155.
49. Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1895. Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen, vol. 2, Formenlehre. Leipzig: Reisland.
50. Nevaci, Manuela. 2006. Verbul în aromânǎ;. Structurǎ; şi valori. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.
51. Nevaci, Manuela. 2007. Participiul în aromânǎ;. Forme şi valori. Studii şi cercetǎ;ri lingvistice 58. 147-154.
52. OLD = Glare, Peter (ed.). 2005. The Oxford Latin dictionary. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
53. Panǎ; Dindelegan, Gabriela. 2007. Din nou despre participiu şi supin: Câteva precizǎ;ri. Studii şi cercetǎ;ri lingvistice 58. 163-173.
54. Panǎ; Dindelegan, Gabriela. 2011. Din istoria supinului românesc. In Rodica Zafiu, Camelia Uşurelu & Helga Bogdan-Oprea (eds.), Limba românǎ;. Ipostaze ale variaţiei lingvistice, 119-130. Bucharest: Editura Universitǎ;ţii din Bucureşti.
55. Panǎ; Dindelegan, Gabriela (ed.). 2013. The grammar of Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Panagl, Oswald. 1987. Productivity and diachronic change in morphology. In Wolfgang Dressler, Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang Wurzel (eds.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology, 127-151. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
57. Pancratz, A. 1925. Das Partizipium Perfekti Passivi und seine Anwendung im Rumänischen. Balkan-Archiv 1. 71-149.
58. Parkinson, Stephen. 1988. Portuguese. In Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds.), The Romance languages, 131-169. London: Routledge.
59. Robinson, Orrin. 1992. Old English and its closest relatives. London: Routledge.
60. Sihler, Andrew. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Soare, Elena. 2007. Romanian participle: 3 items with 1 morphological unit. In Booij, Geert, L. Ducceschi, B. Fradin, E. Guevara, A. Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds.), On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5) 2005, University of Bologna. http:// mmm.lingue.unibo.it/
62. Sommer, Ferdinand. 1948. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre: eine Einführung in das sprachwissenschaftliche Studium des Lateins. Heidelberg, Germany: Winter.
63. Spencer, Andrew. 2010. Factorizing lexical relatedness. In Susan Olsen (ed.), New impulses in word-formation, 133-171. Hamburg: Buske.
64. Stan, Camelia. 2001. Supin. In Sala, Marius (coord.) Enciclopedia limbii române, 551-553. Bucharest: Univers enciclopedic.
65. Stati, Sorin. 1958. Valorile participiului. Limba românǎ; 7. 27-38
66. Thornton, Anna Maria. Forthcoming. Paradigmatically determined allomorphy: The 'participial stem' from Latin to Italian. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter.
67. Todoran, Romulus. 1956. Note morfologice. Cercetǎ;ri de lingvisticǎ; 1. 125-136.
68. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1992. Syntax. In Richard M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, 168-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Uriţescu, Dorin 2007. Dans la perspective de l'Atlas de Crişana (I). Le participe passé dacoroumain en -ǎ;: mythe roumain ou innovation d'une langue romane? In Sandra Reinheimer Rîpeanu & Ioana Vintilǎ;-Rǎ;dulescu (eds.), Limba românǎ; , limbǎ; romanicǎ;. Omagiu acad. Marius Sala la împlinirea a 75 de ani, 555-566. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.
70. Vennemann, Theo. 1978. Phonetic and conceptual analogy. In Philip Baldi & Ronald M. Werth (eds.), Readings in historical phonology, 258-274. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
71. Vincent, Nigel. 1978. Towards an explanation of some analogies in perfect and past participle stems in Latin and Italian. Semasia 5. 47-64.
72. Vincent, Nigel. 1982. The development of the auxiliaries habere and esse in Romance. In Nigel Vincent & Martin Harris (eds.), Studies in the Romance verb, 71-96. London: Croom Helm.
73. Vincent, Nigel. 2011. Non-finite forms, periphrasis, and autonomous morphology in Latin and Romance. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology, 417-435. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Wright, Joseph. 1910. Grammar of the Gothic language. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
75. Zwanenberg, Wiecher. 1999. Homonymie systématique en morphologie: les dérivés de forme participiale du roumain. Recherches de linguistique française et romane de l'Université d'Utrecht 18. 103-113.