When agreement gets trigger-happy

Transactions of the Philological Society

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 313-337

  Comrie, Bernard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646678571     PISSN: 00791636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-968X.00121     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BARLOW, MICHAEL & FERGUSON, CHARLES A., 1988. 'Introduction', in Michael Barlow and Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions, Stanford CA: CSLI, 1-22
2. BICKEL, BALTHASAR, BISANG, WALTER & YĀDAVA, YOGENDRA P., 1999. 'Face vs. empathy: the social foundation of Maithili verb agreement', Linguistics 37, 481-518
3. BOBALJIK, JONATHAN DAVID & WURMBRAND, SUSI, 2002. 'Notes on agreement in Itelmen', Linguistic Discovery 1
4. EVANS, NICHOLAS, 2003. 'Typologies of agreement: some problems from Kayardild', Transactions of the Philological Society 101, 203-234
5. HARRIS, ALICE C., 1981. Georgian Syntax: A Study in Relational Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. HUDDLESTON, RODNEY & PULLUM, GEOFFREY K., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. JELINEK, ELOISE & DEMERS, RICHARD, 1983. 'The agent hierarchy and voice in some Coast Salish languages', International Journal of American Linguistics 49, 167-185
8. KEPPING, K[SENIJA] B., 1979. 'Elements of ergativity and nominativity in Tangut', in Frans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, London: Academic Press, 263-277
9. LESOURD, PHILIP, 1976. 'Verb agreement in Fox', in Jorge Hankamer and Judith Aissen (eds.), Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics, vol. II, Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, 445-528
10. MEL'ČUK, IGOR A., 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice, New York: State University of New York Press
11. MUNRO, PAMELA & GORDON, LYNN, 1982. 'Syntactic relations in Western Muskogean: a typological perspective', Language 58, 81-115
12. POLINSKY, MARIA, 2000. 'Variation in complementation constructions: Long-Distance Agreement in Tsez', in Kaoru Horie (ed.), Complementation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 58-90
13. POLINSKY, MARIA, 2003. 'Non-canonical agreement is canonical', Transactions of the Philological Society 101, 279-312
14. POLINSKY, MARIA & COMRIE, BERNARD, 1999a. 'Agreement in Tsez', Folia Linguistica 33, 109-130
15. POLINSKY, MARIA & COMRIE, BERNARD, 1999b. 'Possessor raising in a language that does not have any', in Doris L. Payne and Emmanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 523-542
16. POLINSKY, MARIA, & POTSDAM, ERIC, 2001. 'Long-Distance Agreement and topic in Tsez', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 583-646
17. STUMP, GREGORY T. & YADAV, RAMAWATAR, 1988. 'Maithili verb agreement and the control agreement principle', in Diane Brentari, Gary Larson and Lynn MacLeod (eds.), Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part Two: Parasession on Agreement in Grammatical Theory, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 304-321
18. VAN DRIEM, GEORGE, 1987. A Grammar of Limbu, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
19. YADAV, RAMAWATAR, 1996. A Reference Grammar of Maithili, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter