Enabling participants in online forums to learn from each other

Collaborative Learning, Reasoning, and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 61-98

  Linn, Marcia C ^a   Slotta, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925801731     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203826843     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Agogino, A. M., & Linn, M. C. (1992, May-June). Retaining female engineering students: Will early design experiences help? NSF Directions, 8-9.
2. Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
3. Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
5. Baumgartner, E. (2004). Synergy research and knowledge integration: Customizing activities around stream ecology. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet Environments for Science Education (pp. 261-288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children, 10(2), 44-75.
7. Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 10–19). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
8. Bell, P. (1998). Designing for students' conceptual change in science using argumentation and classroom debate. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
9. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the Web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797-817.
10. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321-346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in selfexplanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221-252.
12. Bowen, C. W. (2000). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 116-119.
13. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
14. Bruckman, A. (1997). MOOSE crossing: Construction, community, and learning in a networked virtual world for kids. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA.
15. Bruckman, A. (2000). Situated support for learning: Storm's weekend with Rachael. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 329-372.
16. Burbules, N. C., & Linn, M. C. (1991). Science education and the philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? International Journal of Science Education, 13, 227–241.
17. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
18. Chi, M. T. H., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancer, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
19. Clancy, M., Titterton, N., Ryan, C., Slotta, J., & Linn, M. C. (2003). New roles for students, instructors, and computers in a lab-based introductory programming course. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCSE, Reno, NV.
20. Clark, D. (2000). Scaffolding knowledge integration through curricular depth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
21. Clark, D. B., & Jorde, D. (in press). Re-explanation of experiential ideas through targeted computer visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
22. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. American Review of Sociology, 8, 209-235.
24. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
25. Cuthbert, A. (2002). Learning science through the design of passive solar dwellings: Can specialization contribute to improved learning outcomes and design methods. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
26. Cuthbert, A. J., Clark, D. B. & Linn, M. C. (2002). WISE learning communities: Design considerations. In K.A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 215-246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Davis, E. A. (1998). Scaffolding students' reflection for science learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
28. Davis, E. A. (2003a). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91-142.
29. Davis, E. A. (2003b). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analyzing teachers' knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34, 21-53.
30. Davis, E. A. (2004). Creating critique projects. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet Environments for Science Education (pp. 89-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819-837.
32. Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, R., & Scott, P. (1965). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
33. Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39, 39-72.
34. Eylon, B. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58, 251–301.
35. Gordin, D. N., Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (1994). The climate visualizer: Sense-making through scientific visualization. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 203-226.
36. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (Eds.). (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Hegarty, M., Quilici, J., Narayanan, N. H., Holmquist, S., & Moreno, R. (1999). Multimedia instruction: Lessons from evaluation of a theory-based design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 119-150.
38. Hoadley, C. (1999). Scaffolding scientific discussion using socially relevant representations in networked multimedia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
39. Hoadley, C. (2004). Fostering productive collaboration offline and online: learning from each other. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 145-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Teaching science through online peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 839-857.
41. Hsi, S. (1997). Facilitating knowledge integration in science through electronic discussion: The Multimedia Forum Kiosk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
42. Hunter, B. (1990). Computer-mediated communications support for teacher collaborations: Researching new contexts for both teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 30(10), 46-49.
43. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38, 67-73.
44. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30, 26-35.
45. Keller, E. F. (1993). Gender and science. San Francisco: Freeman.
46. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (1999). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E. V. Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry: Science learning and teaching (pp. 283-315). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
47. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689.
48. Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155-178.
49. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337.
50. Lajoie, S. P., & Lesgold, A. M. (1992). Dynamic assessment of proficiency for solving procedural knowledge tasks. Educational Psychologist, 27, 365-384.
51. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
52. Linn, M. C. (1980). Teaching children to control variables: Some investigations using free choice experiences. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Toward a theory of psychological development within the Piagetian framework (pp. 673-697). Windsor, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
53. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology 4, 103-126.
54. Linn, M. C. (2000). Controversy, the Internet, and deformed frogs: making science accessible. In Who will do the science of the future? A symposium on careers of women in science (pp. 16-27). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
55. Linn, M. C. (in press). WISE design for lifelong learning-Pivotal Cases. In P. Gärdenfors & P. Johannsson (Eds.), Cognition, Education and Communication Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Linn, M. C. & Burbules, N. C. (1993). Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 91-119). Washington, D. C: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
57. Linn, M. C., & Clancy, M. J. (1992). The case for case studies of programming problems. Communications of the ACM, 35(3), 121-132.
58. Linn, M. C., Clark, D. B. & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87, 517-538.
59. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.). (2004). Internet Environments for Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Linn, M. C., Shear, L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J. D. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about 'rats in space' and 'deformed frogs'. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 61-85.
62. Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1991). Cognitive and conceptual change in adolescence. American Journal of Education, 99, 379-417.
63. Longino, H. (1994). The fate of knowledge in social theories of science. In F. F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge (pp. 135-158). Lanham, MD: Rowan Littlefield.
64. Minstrell, J., & Van Zee, E. (Eds.). (2000). Teaching in the inquiry-based science classroom. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
65. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-949.
66. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johannsen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67, 625-645.
67. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
68. Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the centralized mindset. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 1-22.
69. Resnick, M. (2001). Closing the fluency gap. Communications of the ACM, 44, 3.
70. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
71. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
72. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). An architecture for collaborative knowledge building. In E. De Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 41-46). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
73. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledgebuilding discourse. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 37-41.
74. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Hewitt, J., & Webb, J. (1996). Constructive learning from texts in biology. In K.M. Fischer, & M. Kirby (Eds.), Relations and biology learning: The acquisition and use of knowledge structures in biology (pp. 44-64). Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
75. Seethaler, S., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Genetically modified food in perspective: An inquiry-based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1765-1785.
76. Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429-445.
77. Slotta, J. D. (2004). WISE science teaching. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203-232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Songer, N. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms - A case of kids as global scientists. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 297-327.
79. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of smallgroup learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.
80. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
81. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
82. Thagard, P. (1994). Mind, society, and the growth of knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 61, 629-645.
83. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument/ Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84. Webb, N. M. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.
85. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369-395.
86. Webb, N. M., & Palinscar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In. D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.