Secondary Stakeholder Influence on CSR Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Salience Theory

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 873-891

  Thijssens, Thomas ^a,b   Bollen, Laury ^a   Hassink, Harold ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility; CSR disclosure; Environmental NGOs; Environmental reporting; Stakeholder salience theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925609514     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2623-3     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Adams, C. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting; beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,15(2), 223–250.
2. Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society,34(1), 1–27.
3. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal,42(5), 507–525.
4. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility, a comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review,14(3), 147–158.
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6), 1173–1182.
6. Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure; a framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,20(2), 269–296.
7. Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2009). Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US. Accounting Forum,33, 162–175.
8. Bowen, F. E. (2000). Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and the Environment,9(2), 92–107.
9. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies,41(8), 1411–1434.
10. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review,13(2/3), 86–99.
11. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,33(7), 1168–1188.
12. Buhr, N., & Freedman, M. (2001). Culture, institutional factors and differences in environmental disclosure between Canada and the United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting,12(3), 293–322.
13. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2008). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College.
14. Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics,82(1), 131–144.
15. Cho, C. H., Freedman, M., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: A test of alternative theories. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,25(3), 486–507.
16. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society,32(7–8), 639–647.
17. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review,20(1), 92–117.
18. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. M., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society,33(4/5), 303–327.
19. Cooper, W. H., & Richardson, A. J. (1986). Unfair comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology,71(2), 179–184.
20. Cormier, D., Gordon, I. M., & Magnan, M. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management’s perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics,49(2), 143–165.
21. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: Determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,14(4), 429–451.
22. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Pension funds and Corporate Social Performance: An empirical analysis. Business and Society,47(2), 213–241.
23. Darnall, N., Seol, I., & Sarkis, J. (2009). Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations’ use of environmental audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society,34(2), 170–187.
24. Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society,31(4/5), 343–372.
25. Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies,42(2), 329–360.
26. Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment,19(4), 245–260.
27. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional–stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies,43(1), 47–73.
28. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review,20(1), 65–91.
29. Driscoll, C., & Crombie, A. (2001). Stakeholder legitimacy management and the qualified good neighbor: The case of Nova Nada and JDI. Business and Society,40(4), 442–471.
30. Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics,49(1), 55–73.
31. Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal,27(8), 765–781.
32. Elijido-Ten, E., Kloot, L., & Clarkson, P. (2010). Extending the application of stakeholder influence strategies to environmental disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,20(8), 1032–1059.
33. Freeman, E. G. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
34. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2001). Socially responsible investment and corporate social and environmental reporting in the UK: An exploratory study. British Accounting Review,33(4), 325–548.
35. Gago, R. F., & Antolin, M. N. (2004). Stakeholder salience in corporate environmental strategy. Corporate Governance,4(3), 65–76.
36. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal,37(4), 1034–1046.
37. GRI. (2013). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines; reporting principles and standard disclosures. Retrieved June 18, 2014, from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf
38. Grunig, J. E. (1983). Communication behaviors and attitudes of environmental publics: Two studies. Journalism Monographs,81, 1–47.
39. Hackston, D., & Milne, M. D. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,9(1), 77–108.
40. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production,59, 5–21.
41. Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management,13(2), 137–157.
42. Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive,17(2), 56–69.
43. Harvey, B., & Schaefer, A. (2001). Managing stakeholder relations with environmental stakeholders: A study of U.K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics,30(3), 243–260.
44. Hibbitt, C. (2004). External environmental disclosure and reporting by large European companies. An economic, social and political analysis of managerial behaviour. Amsterdam: Limperg Instituut.
45. Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2008). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics,84(4), 497–527.
46. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal,42(5), 564–576.
47. Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review,32(1), 137–155.
48. Knox, S., Maklan, S., & French, P. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Exploring stakeholder relationships and programme reporting across leading FTSE companies. Journal of Business Ethics,61(1), 7–28.
49. KPMG International. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Zug: KPMG International.
50. Magness, V. (2006). Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,19(4), 540–563.
51. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies,33(3), 497–514.
52. Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenberg Domini ratings data. Business and Society,45(1), 20–46.
53. Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., & Gray, S. J. (1995). Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by U.S., U.K. and Continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies,26(3), 555–572.
54. Miles, S., Hammond, K., & Friedman, A. L. (2002). Social and environmental reporting and ethical investment. ACCA Research report No. 77. London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust.
55. Mitchell, R. K., & Agle, B. R. (Eds.). (1997). Stakeholder identification and salience: Dialogue and operationalization. Destin, FL: International Association for Business and Society.
56. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly,21(2), 235–255.
57. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 853–886.
58. Myllykangas, P., Kujala, J., & Lehtimaki, H. (2010). Analyzing the essence of stakeholder relationships: What do we need in addition to power, legitimacy, and urgency? Journal of Business Ethics,96, 65–72.
59. Neill, J. D., & Stovall, S. O. (2005). Stakeholder salience and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from three companies. Journal of Applied Business Research,21(3), 71–78.
60. Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society,23(3), 265–282.
61. Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. (2011). Stakeholder salience revisited: Refining, redefining, and refuelling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. Journal of Business Ethics,102, 357–378.
62. Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics,66(4), 377–391.
63. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. O’Dywer, B., Unerman, J., & Bradley, J. (2005). Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,18(1), 14–43.
65. Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics,75(1), 1–23.
66. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
67. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
68. Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review,16(3), 160–177.
69. Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal,30, 1157–1178.
70. Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society,17(6), 595–612.
71. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 887–910.
72. Schaltegger, S. (1997). Information costs, quality of information and stakeholder involvement—The necessity of international standards of ecological accounting. Eco-Management and Auditing,4, 87–97.
73. Sharfman, M. (1996). A construct validity study of the KLD social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics,15(3), 287–297.
74. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review,84(3), 937–967.
75. Smith, J., Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,24(2), 123–151.
76. Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A review of the developing link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,52(1), 45–57.
77. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review,20(3), 571–610.
78. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal,31(5), 463–490.
79. Tashman, P., & Raelin, J. (2013). Who and what really matters to the firm: Moving stakeholder salience beyond managerial perceptions. Business Ethics Quarterly,23(4), 591–616.
80. Tilt, C. A. (1994). The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure; some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,7(4), 47–72.
81. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review,10(3), 540–557.
82. van Nimwegen, G., Bollen, L., Hassink, H., & Thijssens, T. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on mission statements: An international empirical study. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,16(1/2), 61–82.
83. Weber, J., & Marley, K. A. (2012). In search of stakeholder salience: Exploring corporate social and sustainability reports. Business and Society,51(4), 626–649.
84. Wheeler, D., & Elkington, J. (2001). The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication. Business Strategy and the Environment,10(1), 1–14.