Analyzing the essence of stakeholder relationships: What do we need in addition to power, legitimacy, and urgency?

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 96, Issue , 2010, Pages 65-72

  Myllykangas, Päivi ^a   Kujala, Johanna ^b   Lehtimäki, Hanna ^b  

^a Confederation of Finnish Industries ^*  (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Salience model; Stakeholder relationship; Value creation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015763582     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0945-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Oijala, T. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 509-516.
2. Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 5-32.
3. Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2009). Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US. Accounting Forum, 33(2), 162-175.
4. Calton, J. M., & Payne, S. L. (2003). Coping with paradox. Business and Society, 42, 7-42.
5. Co, H. C., & Barro, F. (2009). Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(6), 591-611.
6. de Vries, J. (2009). Assessing inventory projects from a stakeholder perspective: Results of an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 136-145.
7. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8. Dyer, J. F., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
9. Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765-781.
10. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman.
11. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Survival, reputation, and success. London: Yale University Press.
12. Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal, 15(3), 286-296.
13. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
14. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1-21.
15. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review,24(2), 191-205.
16. Goyder, M. (1999). Value and values: Lessons for tomorrow’s company. Long Range Planning, 32(2), 217-224.
17. Harvey, B., & Schaefer, A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of U. K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics,30(3), 243-260.
18. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
19. Jawahar, I. M., & Mclaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life-cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397-414.
20. Kyngäs, H., & Vanhanen, L. (1999). Sisällön analyysi. Hoitotiede, 11, 3-12.
21. Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics,83(2), 177-192.
22. Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1982). Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial company. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 465-499.
23. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
24. Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19-32). Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
25. Neill, J. D., & Stovall, O. S. (2005). Stakeholder salience and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from three companies. Journal of Applied Business Research,21(3), 71-78.
26. Neville, B., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377-391.
27. Pajunen, K. (2006). Living in agreement with a contract: The management of moral and viable firm-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 243-258.
28. Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1-23.
29. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6-28.
30. Ramírez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practise and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49-65.
31. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
32. Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204-219.
33. Svendsen, A., Boutlier, R., Abbott, R., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Measuring the business value of stakeholder relationships. Vancouver: The Centre for Innovation in Management, Simon Fraser University.
34. Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2006). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
35. Wheeler, D., & Davies, R. (2004). Gaining goodwill: Developing stakeholder approaches to corporate governance. Journal of General Management, 30, 51-74.
36. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (Revised ed.). London: Sage.