Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale

Geomorphology

Volumn 161-162, Issue , 2012, Pages 40-57

  Schicker, Renée ^a   Moon, Vicki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

GIS; Landslide susceptibility; Logistic regression; Weights of evidence

Indexed keywords

DATABASE; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; GIS; LANDSLIDE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND; WAIKATO;

EID: 84861572418     PISSN: 0169555X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.036     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Akgün A., Bulut F. GIS-based landslide susceptibility for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region. Environmental Geology 2007, 51:1377-1387.
2. Arora M.K., Das Gupta A.S., Gupta R.P. An artificial neural network approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2004, 25:559-572.
3. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 2005, 65:15-31.
4. Barbieri G., Cambuli P. The weight of evidence statistical method in landslide susceptibility mapping of the Rio Pardu Valley (Sardinia, Italy). 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13-17 July 2009 http://mssanz.org.au/modsim09.
5. Bonham-Carter G. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS 1994, Pergamon, New York, 398pp.
6. Can T., Nefeslioglu H.A., Gokceoglu C., Sonmez H., Duman T.Y. Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 2005, 72:250-271.
7. Cascini L. Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales. Engineering Geology 2008, 102:164-177.
8. Chung C.-J.F., Fabbri A.G. Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1999, 65:1389-1399.
9. Dahal R.K., Hasegawa S., Nonomura A., Yamanaka M., Masuda T., Nishino K. GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environmental Geology 2008, 54:311-324.
10. Dai F.C., Lee C.F., Li J., Xu Z.W. Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environmental Geology 2001, 40:381-391.
11. Dellow G. Re: Landslide Inventory for the Waikato query 2009, Email to R. Schicker. 2 February 2009.
12. Dewitte O., Chung C., Cornet Y., Daoudi M., Demoulin A. Combining spatial data in landslide reactivation susceptibility mapping: a likelihood ratio-based approach in W Belgium. Geomorphology 2010, 122:153-166.
13. Duman T.Y., Can T., Gokceoglu C., Nefeslioglu H.A., Sonmez H. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environmental Geology 2006, 51:241-256.
14. Edbrooke S.W. Geology of the Auckland area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250000 Geological Map 3. 1 sheet + 74 p 2001, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
15. Edbrooke S.W. Geology of the Waikato area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250000 Geological Map 4. 1 sheet + 68 p 2005, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
16. Environment Waikato Waikato State of the Environment Report 1998, Environment Waikato, N. Z.
17. ESRI (Environmental Research Systems Institute Inc) ArcGIS Version 9.3. Redlands 2009.
18. Fell R., Corominas J., Bonnard C., Cascini L., Leroi E., Savage W.Z. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Engineering Geology 2008, 102:99-111. on behalf of the JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes.
19. Fell R., Corominas J., Bonnard C., Cascini L., Leroi E., Savage W.Z. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Engineering Geology 2008, 102:85-98. on behalf of the JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes.
20. GNS Geological Spatial Layers 2000, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, CD-ROM.
21. He Y., Beighley R.E. GIS-based regional landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in southern California. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2008, 33:380-393.
22. Healy J. Geological Map of New Zealand 1:250 000, Sheet 5, Rotorua 1964, New Zealand Geological Survey, DSIR, Wellington.
23. Hengl T. Finding the right pixel size. Computers & Geosciences 2006, 32:1283-1298.
24. Hewitt A.E. New Zealand Soil Classification 2010, Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd, 136pp. 3rd ed.
25. Lan H.X., Zhou C.H., Wang L.J., Zhang H.Y., Li R.H. Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using GIS in the Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan, China. Engineering Geology 2004, 76:109-128.
26. Landcare Research Ltd. Climate Surfaces for New Zealand. CD-ROM 1998.
27. Leathwick J.R., Wilson G., Stephens R.T.T. Climate surfaces for New Zealand. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC9798/126 2002, Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research.
28. Lee S. Application of likelihood ratio and logistic regression models to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Environmental Management 2004, 34:223-232.
29. Lee S. Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2005, 26:1477-1491.
30. Lee S., Choi J. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and the weight-of-evidence model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2004, 18:789-814.
31. Lee S., Ryu J.-H., Lee M.-J., Won J.-S. Use of an artificial neural network for analysis of the susceptibility to landslides at Boun, Korea. Environmental Geology 2003, 44:820-833.
32. Lee S., Choi J., Woo I. The effect of spatial resolution on the accuracy of landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in Boun, Korea. Geosciences Journal 2004, 8:51-60.
33. LINZ New Zealand 1:50,000 topographic vector data (NZTopo). Land Information New Zealand. CD-ROM 2000.
34. Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences 1995, 106. Thousand Oaks, California, 98pp.
35. Ministry for the Environment Land Environments of New Zealand: A Technical Guide 2002, 237pp.
36. Ministry for the Environment New Zealand land cover database version 2. Illustrated Guide to Target Classes, Version 4. 61p 2004.
37. Nandi A., Shakoor A. A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Engineering Geology 2009, 110:11-20.
38. Neuhäuser B., Terhorst B. Landslide susceptibility assessment using "weights-of-evidence" applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 2007, 86:12-24.
39. Newsome P.F.J., Wilde R.H., Willoughby E.J. Land Resource Information System Spatial Data Layers 2000, Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd, http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/databases.
40. O'Brien R.M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity 2007, 41:673-690.
41. Ohlmacher G.C., Davis J.C. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Engineering Geology 2003, 69:331-343.
42. Santacana N., Baeza B., Corominas J., De Paz A., Marturiá J. A GIS-based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet Area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Natural Hazards 2003, 30:281-295.
43. StatSoft STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), Version 9.0. Tulsa 2009.
44. Süzen M.L., Doyuran V. A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environmental Geology 2004, 45:665-679.
45. Terralink International Ltd. New Zealand Land Cover Database (LCDB2). Ministry for the Environment. CD-ROM 2004.
46. Thiery Y., Malet J.-P., Sterlacchini S., Puissant A., Maquaire O. Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales: application to a complex mountainous environment. Geomorphology 2007, 92:38-59.
47. Van Den Eeckhout M., Vanwalleghem T., Poesen J., Govers G., Verstraeten G., Vandekerckhove L. Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology 2006, 76:392-410.
48. Van Den Eeckhout M., Moeyersons J., Nyssen J., Abraha A., Poesen J., Haile M., Deckers J. Spatial patterns of old, deep-seated landslides: a case-study in the northern Ethiopian highlands. Geomorphology 2009, 105:239-252.
49. Van Westen C.J., van Asch T.W.J., Soeters R. Landslide hazard and risk zonation - why is it still so difficult?. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2006, 65:167-184.
50. Wang H.B., Sassa K. Comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Minamata area, Japan. Environmental Geology 2005, 47:956-966.
51. Yilmaz I. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Computers & Geosciences 2009, 35:1125-1138.
52. Yilmaz I. A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2009, 68:297-306.