Pleth variability index predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 294-299

  Loupec, Thibault ^a   Nanadoumgar, Hodanou ^a   Frasca, Denis ^a   Petitpas, Franck ^a,b   Laksiri, Leila ^a,b   Baudouin, Didier ^a,b   Debaene, Bertrand ^a   Dahyot Fizelier, Claire ^a,b   Mimoz, Olivier ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b ERI 23   (France)

Author keywords

cardiac output; echocardiography; fluid responsiveness; heart lung interactions; hypovolemia; mechanical ventilation; passive leg raising; pleth variability index; septic shock

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEART SEPTUM DEFECT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOXEMIA; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; PHYSICIAN; PLETH VARIABILITY INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 79251590464     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ffde1c     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Teboul JL, Monnet X: Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: Two different problems, only one solution. Crit Care 2009; 13:175
2. Verdant C, De Backer D: How monitoring of the microcirculation may help us at the bedside. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11:240-244
3. Brandt S, Regueira T, Bracht H, et al: Effect of fluid resuscitation on mortality and organ function in experimental sepsis models. Crit Care 2009; 13:R186
4. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647
5. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178
6. Bendjelid K, Romand JA: Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:352-360
7. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138
8. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al: Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-755
9. Feissel M, Badie J, Merlani PG, et al: Preejection period variations predict the fluid responsiveness of septic ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2534-2539
10. Feissel M, Teboul JL, Merlani P, et al: Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:993-999
11. Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, et al: Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2007; 106:1105-1111
12. Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, et al: Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:555-561
13. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, et al: Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:200-206
14. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1301-1308
15. Huntsman LL, Stewart DK, Barnes SR, et al: Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. Circulation 1983; 67:593-602
16. Lewis JF, Kuo LC, Nelson JG, et al: Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: Clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation 1984; 70: 425-431
17. Loufti H, Nishimura RA: Quantitative evaluation of left ventricular systolic function by Doppler echocardiography techniques. Echocardiography 1994; 11:305-314
18. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al: Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1402-1407
19. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1475-1483
20. Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr: Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Second Edition. London, UK, McGraw-Hill, 1988
21. Feissel M, Kalakhy R, Badie J, et al: Plethysmography variability index: A new fluid responsiveness parameter. Crit Care 2009; 13(Suppl 1):P205
22. Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, et al: Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121:1245-1252
23. Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C, et al: Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: Importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:85-90
24. Thiel SW, Kollef MH, Isakow W: Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: An observational cohort study. Crit Care 2009; 13:R111
25. Cannesson M, Delannoy B, Morand A, et al: Does the Pleth variability index indicate the respiratory-induced variation in the plethysmogram and arterial pressure waveforms? Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1189-1194
26. Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, et al: Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128:848-854
27. Landsverk SA, Hoiseth LO, Kvandal P, et al: Poor agreement between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude and pulse pressure in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology 2008; 109:849-855
28. Natalini G, Rosano A, Taranto M, et al: Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: A clinical trial. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 1478-1484
29. Cannesson M, Awad AA, Shelley K: Oscillations in the plethysmographic waveform amplitude: Phenomenon hides behind artifacts. Anesthesiology 2009; 111:206 -207; author reply 207-208
30. Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008
31. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al: Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-1321
32. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368-1377
33. Micek ST, Roubinian N, Heuring T, et al: Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:2707-2713
34. Chytra I, Pradl R, Bosman R, et al: Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multipletrauma patients: A randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R24
35. Wiedemann HP: A perspective on the Fluids And Catheters Treatment Trial (FACTT). Fluid restriction is superior in acute lung injury and ARDS. Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:42-48
36. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, et al: Comparison of two fluidmanagement strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2564-2575
37. Upadya A, Tilluckdharry L, Muralidharan V, et al: Fluid balance and weaning outcomes. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:1643-1647
38. Malbrain ML, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, et al: Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: A multiple-center epidemiological study. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 315-322
39. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Díaz Monrové JC: Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2009; 13:R142
40. Auler JO Jr, Galas FR, Sundin MR, et al: Arterial pulse pressure variation predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Shock 2008; 30(Suppl 1):18-22
41. Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM: Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: A randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14:R18
42. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, et al: Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R100
43. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, et al: Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2010; 14:R118
44. Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M: Does the pleth variability index improve fluid management during major abdominal surgery? Crit Care 2009; 13(Suppl 1):P204
45. Shelley KH, Jablonka DH, Awad AA, et al: What is the best site for measuring the effect of ventilation on the pulse oximeter waveform? Anesth Analg 2006; 103:372-377, table of contents
46. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270:2957-2963
47. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al: The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:707-710