Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1186-1191

  Biais, Matthieu ^a,b   Cottenceau, Vincent ^a   Stecken, Laurent ^a   Jean, Maylis ^a   Ottolenghi, Laetitia ^a   Roullet, Stéphanie ^a   Quinart, Alice ^a   Sztark, François ^a,b  

^a BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

ardiac output; fluid responsiveness; heart lung interactions; hypovolemia; mechanical ventilation; stroke volume variations

Indexed keywords

NORADRENALIN;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING RATE; CARDIOPULMONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; ISCHEMIA; MALE; MULTIPLE TRAUMA; PRESSURE RECORDING ANALYTIC METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPTIC SHOCK; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TACHYCARDIA; TIDAL VOLUME; URINE VOLUME; VASCULAR SURGERY;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84858785476     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc632     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647
2. Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008
3. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al: Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:64-68
4. Michard F: Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:419-428
5. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL: Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1:1-9
6. Pinsky MR: Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1008-1010
7. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Augarde R, et al: Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support revisited by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:671-676
8. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al: Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:761-768
9. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al: Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119:867-873
10. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, et al: Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128:848-854
11. Michard F, Teboul JL: Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4:282-289
12. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al: Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398
13. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Roullet S, et al: A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2009; 109:466-469
14. De Castro V, Goarin JP, Lhotel L, et al: Comparison of stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume respiratory variation (SVV) measured by the axillary artery pulse-contour method and by aortic Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing aortic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97:605-610
15. Marquez J, McCurry K, Severyn DA, et al: Ability of pulse power, esophageal Doppler, and arterial pulse pressure to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume in humans. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:3001-3007
16. Pinsky MR: Probing the limits of arterial pulse contour analysis to predict preload responsiveness. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1245-1247
17. Romano SM, Pistolesi M: Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1834-1841
18. Maj G, Monaco F, Landoni G, et al: Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25:476-480
19. Paarmann H, Groesdonk HV, Sedemund-Adib B, et al: Lack of agreement between pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output and the pressure recording analytical method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 475-481
20. Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, et al: Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:159-165
21. Zangrillo A, Maj G, Monaco F, et al: Cardiac index validation using the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 24:265-269
22. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138
23. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al: Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402-1407
24. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:837-845
25. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327:307-310
26. Critchley LA, Critchley JA: A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:85-91
27. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM: A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:1180-1192
28. Pinsky MR: Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 386-388
29. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, et al: Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R100
30. Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, et al: Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: A randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14:R18
31. Annane D, Sebille V, Duboc D, et al: Incidence and prognosis of sustained arrhythmias in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178:20-25
32. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al: Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1480-1486
33. Godje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE, et al: Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:52-58
34. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A: Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:843-846