Organizations in the making: Learning and intervening at the science-policy interface

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 146-166

  Pallett, Helen ^a   Chilvers, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

co production; organizational learning; organizations; science and technology studies; science policy interface

Indexed keywords

LEARNING; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84924865402     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: 14770288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309132513518831     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. Anderson B.Hope for nanotechnology: Anticipatory knowledge and the governance of affect.Area. 2007;39 (2): 156-165
2. Anderson B,Holden A.Affective urbanism and the event of hope.Space and Culture. 2008;11 (2): 142-159
3. Argote L,Miron-Spektor E.Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge.Organization Science. 2011;22 (5): 1123-1137
4. Argyris C,Schön DOrganizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1996:
5. Barnes TJ.Retheorizing economic geography: From the quantitative revolution to the ‘cultural turn’.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2001;91 (3): 546-565
6. Barry A.Technological zones.European Journal of Social Theory. 2006;9 (2): 239-253
7. Bastrup-Birk H,Wildemeersch D.Navigating the tides of change: Revisiting the notion of reflexivity in the context of social learning for transboundary collective experimentation.Studies in Continuing Education. 2011;33 (3): 219-234
8. Beck U,Bonss W,Lau C.The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme.Theory, Culture and Society. 2003;20 (2): 1-33
9. Béland D.The politics of social learning: Finance, institutions, and pension reform in the United States and Canada.Governance – An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions. 2006;19 (4): 559-583
10. Berry BJLGeography of Market Centers and Retail Distribution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1967:
11. Beyes T,Steyaert C.Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space.Organization. 2012;19 (1): 45-61
12. Bickerstaff K,Lorenzoni I,Jones M, et al.Locating scientific citizenship: The institutional contexts and cultures of public engagement.Science Technology and Human Value. 2010;35 (4): 474-500
13. Bloor DKnowledge and Social Imagery. 1976 Knowledge and Social Imagery, second edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1976:
14. Boje DM,Burnes B,Hassard JThe Routledge Companion to Organizational Change. Boje DMBurnes BHassard J, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012:1-10.
15. Boyd E,Osbahr H.Responses to climate change: Exploring organisational learning across internationally networked organisations for development.Environmental Education Research. 2010;16 (5): 629-643
16. Braun K,Kropp C.Beyond speaking truth? Institutional responses to uncertainty in scientific governance.Science, Technology and Human Values. 2010;35 (6): 771-782
17. Brown MBScience in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions and Representation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2009:
18. Brown JS,Duguid P.Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation.Organization Science. 1991;2 (1): 40-57
19. Bulkeley H.Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks.Political Geography. 2005;24 (8): 875-902
20. Burgess J.Follow the argument where it leads: Some personal reflections on ‘policy-relevant’.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2005;30 (3): 273-281
21. Burnes BThe Routledge Companion to Organizational Change. Boje DMBurnes BHassard J, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012:11-14.
22. Callon M,Law J.Guest editorial: absence – presence, circulation, and encountering in complex space.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2004;22 (1): 3-11
23. Callon M,Lascoumbes P,Barthe YActing in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2009:
24. Cameron E.New geographies of story and storytelling.Progress in Human Geography. 2012;36 (5): 573-592
25. Chess C,Johnson B.Organizational learning about public participation: ‘Tiggers’ and ‘Eeyores’.Human Ecology Review. 2006;13:182-192
26. Chilvers J.Environmental risk, uncertainty, and participation: Mapping an emergent epistemic community.Environment and Planning A. 2008;40 (12): 2990-3008
27. Chilvers JThe Companion to Environmental Geography. Castree NDemeritt DLiverman D, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2009:400-417.
28. Chilvers J.Reflexive engagement? Actors, learning, and reflexivity in public dialogue on science and technology.Science Communication. 2013;35 (3): 283-310
29. Chilvers J,Evans J.Understanding networks at the science-policy interface.Geoforum. 2009;40 (3): 355-362
30. Conradson D.Doing organisational space: Practices of voluntary welfare in the city.Environment and Planning A. 2003;35 (11): 1975-1992
31. Cook SDN,Brown JS.Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing.Organization Science. 1999;1 (4): 381-401
32. Dale K.Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control.Organization. 2005;12 (5): 649-678
33. Davies G.Mapping deliberation: Calculation, articulation and intervention in the politics of organ transplantation.Economy and Society. 2006;35 (2): 232-258
34. Demeritt D.Harnessing science and securing societal impacts from publicly funded research: Reflections on UK science policy.Environment and Planning A. 2010;42 (3): 515-523
35. Demeritt D,Lees L.Research relevance, ‘knowledge transfer’ and the geographies of CASE studentship collaboration.Area. 2005;37 (2): 127-137
36. Dixon AD.Variegated capitalism and the geography of finance: Towards a common agenda.Progress in Human Geography. 2010;35 (2): 193-210
37. Doubleday R.Organizing accountability: Co-production of technoscientific and social worlds in a nanoscience laboratory.Area. 2007;39 (2): 166-175
38. Doubleday R,Wynne BReframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Jasanoff S, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2011:239-261.
39. Dowling R.Geographies of identity: Labouring in the ‘neoliberal’ university.Progress in Human Geography. 2008;32:812-820
40. Eden S.Green, gold and grey geography: Legitimating academic and policy expertise.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2005;30 (3): 282-286
41. Eden S.The work of environmental governance networks: Traceability, credibility and certification by the Forest Stewardship Council.Geoforum. 2009;40 (3): 383-394
42. England KVL.Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research.The Professional Geographer. 1994;46 (1): 80-89
43. Felt U,Wynne BBelgium: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2007:
44. Fiol CM,Lyles MA.Organizational learning.The Academy of Management Review. 1985;10 (4): 803-813
45. Fiorino DJ.Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk – a survey of institutional mechanisms.Science Technology and Human Values. 1990;15 (2): 226-243
46. Gabriel Y,Connell NAD.Co-creating stories: Collaborative experiments in storytelling.Management Learning. 2010;41 (5): 507-523
47. Garud R,Dunbar RLM,Bartel CA.Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning.Organization Science. 2011;22 (3): 587-601
48. Gherardi S.Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: An introduction.The Learning Organization. 2009;16 (5): 352-359
49. Gieryn TFHandbook of Science and Technology Studies. Jasanoff SMarkle GEPetersen JC, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1995:393-443.
50. Gomart E,Hajer MSocial Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Joerges BNowotny H, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2003:33-61.
51. Gooding D.Mapping experiment as a learning process: How the first electromagnetic motor was invented.Science, Technology and Human Values. 1990;15 (2): 165-201
52. Gorman ME.Mind in the world: Cognition and practice in the invention of the telephone.Social Studies of Science. 1997;27 (4): 583-624
53. GottweisHBraunK and PAGANINI Consortium (2007) Participatory Governance and Insitutional Innovation: Final Report. Available at: http://www.univie.ac.at/LSG/paganini/finals_pdf/WP8_FinalReport.pdf.
54. Gross M.Ecological restoration as a real-world experiment: Designing robust implementation strategies in an urban environment.Public Understanding of Science. 2005;14 (3): 269-284
55. Gross MIgnorance and Surprise: Science, Society and Ecological Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2010:
56. Guston DH.Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction.Science Technology and Human Values. 2001;26 (4): 399-408
57. Hagendijk RP.The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds.Minerva. 2004;42 (1): 41-59
58. Hamlin C.Reflexivity in technology studies: Toward a technology of technology (and science)?.Social Studies of Science. 1992;22 (3): 511-544
59. Haraway DJSimians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge; 1991:
60. Hinchliffe S.Indeterminacy in-decisions – science, policy and politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2001;26 (2): 182-204
61. Holifield R.How to speak for aquifers and people at the same time: Environmental justice and counter-network formation at a hazardous waste site.Geoforum. 2009;40 (3): 363-372
62. Hulme MWhy We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009:
63. Irwin AThe Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 2008 STS perspectives on scientific governance. In: HackettEJAmsterdamskaOLynchM. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, third edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 583–608.Hackett EJAmsterdamska OLynch M, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2008:583-608.
64. Irwin A,Michael MScience, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2003:
65. Jasanoff S.Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science.Minerva. 2003;41 (3): 223-244
66. Jasanoff SStates of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Jasanoff S, ed. London: Routledge; 2004:13-45.
67. Jasanoff SDesigns on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005a:
68. Jasanoff SOrganizational Encounters with Risk. Hutter BPower M, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005b:209-232.
69. Jasanoff S,Kim S-H.Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea.Minerva. 2009;47 (2): 119-146
70. Kearnes M,Wienroth M.Tools of the trade: UK research intermediaries and the politics of impacts.Minerva. 2011;49 (2): 153-174
71. Lane SN,Odoni N,Landstrom C, et al.Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2011;36 (1): 15-36
72. Langford M,Higgs G.Accessibility and public service provision: Evaluating the impacts of the Post Office Network Change Programme in the UK.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2010;35 (4): 585-601
73. Larner W,Laurie N.Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water.Geoforum. 2010;41 (2): 218-226
74. Lash S.Reflexivity as non-linearity.Theory, Culture and Society. 2003;20 (2): 49-57
75. Lave J,Wenger ESituated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991:
76. Law JOrganizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell; 1994:
77. Lawhon M,Murphy JT.Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology.Progress in Human Geography. 2011;36:354-378
78. Leach M,Scoones I,Wynne BScience and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books; 2005:
79. Levitt B,March JG.Organizational learning.Annual Review of Sociology. 1988;14 (4): 319-340
80. Loorbach D.Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework.Governance – An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions. 2010;23 (1): 161-183
81. Lorimer H.Telling small stories: Spaces of knowledge and the practice of geography.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2003;28 (2): 197-217
82. Lorimer H.Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’.Progress in Human Geography. 2005;29 (1): 83-94
83. Lorino P,Tricard B,Clot Y.Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: The dialogical mediated inquiry.Organization Studies. 2011;32 (6): 769-801
84. Lynch M.Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge.Theory, Culture and Society. 2000;17 (3): 26-54
85. Lynch M,Cole S.Science and technology studies on trial: Dilemmas of expertise.Social Studies of Science. 2005;35 (2): 269-311
86. McDowell L.Thinking through work: Complex inequalities, constructions of difference and trans-national migrants.Progress in Human Geography. 2008;32 (4): 491-507
87. Mahony M.Boundary spaces: Science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen, 2009.Geoforum. 2013;49:29-39
88. Marcus GE.Ethnography two decades after writing culture: From the experimental to the Baroque.Anthropological Quarterly. 2007;80 (4): 1127-1145
89. Maxey I.Beyond boundaries? Activism, academia, reflexivity and research.Area. 1999;31 (3): 199-208
90. Morris C,Holloway L.Genetic technologies and the transformation of the geographies of UK livestock agriculture: A research agenda.Progress in Human Geography. 2008;33 (3): 313-333
91. Murdoch J.The spaces of actor-network theory.Geoforum. 1998;29 (4): 357-374
92. Olsson PER,Folke C,Berkes F.Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems.Environmental Management. 2004;34 (1): 75-90
93. Owen R,Macnaghten P,Stilgoe J.Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society.Science and Public Policy. 2012;39 (6): 751-760
94. Owens S.Learning across levels of governance: Expert advice and the adoption of carbon dioxide emissions reduction targets in the UK.Global Environmental Change. 2010;20 (3): 394-401
95. Owens SThe Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance. Weingart PLentsch J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:73-101.
96. Owens S,Petts J,Bulkeley H.Boundary work: Knowledge, policy and the urban environment.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2006;24 (5): 633-643
97. Pain R.Social geography: Participatory research.Progress in Human Geography. 2004;28 (5): 652-663
98. Pain R,Kesby M,Askins K.Geographies of impact: Power, participation and potential.Area. 2011;43 (2): 183-188
99. Pain R,Kesby M,Askins K.The politics of social justice in neoliberal times: A reply to Slater.Area. 2012;44 (1): 120-123
100. Pallett H,Chilvers J.A decade of learning about publics, participation and climate change: Institutionalising reflexivity?.Environment and Planning A. 2013;45 (5): 1162-1183
101. Parson EA,Clark WCBarriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Gunderson LHHolling CSLight SS, ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 1995:428-460.
102. Pelling M,High C,Dearing J, et al.Shadow spaces for social learning: A relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations.Environment and Planning A. 2008;40 (4): 867-884
103. Petts J.Learning about learning: lessons from public engagement and deliberation on urban river restoration.The Geographical Journal. 2007;173 (4): 300-311
104. Pickerill J,Chatterton P.Notes towards autonomous geographies: Creation, resistance and self-management as survival tactics.Progress in Human Geography. 2006;30 (6): 730-746
105. Powell RC.Geographies of science: Histories, localities, practices, futures.Progress in Human Geography. 2007;31 (3): 309-329
106. Richards K,Batty M,Edwards K, et al.The nature of publishing and assessment in geography and environmental studies: Evidence from the Research Assessment Exercise 2008.Area. 2009;41 (3): 231-243
107. Rotmans J,Loorbach DManaging the Transition to Renewable Energy. van den Bergh JCJMBruinsma FR, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2008:15-46.
108. SbarceaKMartinsR (2003) The ‘temporary knowledge organisation’ as viewed from a complexity perspective. An enrichment of the traditional organisational project management paradigm. Available at: http://thinkingshift.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/tempknoworg.pdf.
109. Schatzki TR.On organizations as they happen.Organization Studies. 2006;27 (12): 1863-1873
110. Schein EOrganisational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 1995:
111. Schot J,Rip A.The past and future of constructive technology assessment.Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 1997;54 (2–3): 251-268
112. Sinclair AJ,Diduck A,Fitzpatrick P.Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: Critical reflections on 15 years of research.Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2008;28 (7): 415-428
113. Slater T.Impacted geographers: A response to Pain, Kesby and Askins.Area. 2012;44 (1): 117-119
114. Smith A,Stirling A.Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems.Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 2007;9 (3): 351-373
115. Soja EWPostmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso; 1989:
116. Star SL,Griesemer JR.Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects – amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Invertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.Social Studies of Science. 1989;19 (3): 387-420
117. Steyaert P,Ollivier G.The European Water Framework Directive: How ecological assumptions frame technical and social change.Ecology and Society. 2007;12 (1): 25
118. Stirling AReflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Voβ J-PBauknecht DKemp R, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2006:225-272.
119. Stirling A.‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology.Science Technology and Human Values. 2008;33 (2): 262-294
120. Taylor C.Modern social imaginaries.Public Culture. 2002;14 (1): 91-124
121. Thrift N.The future of geography.Geoforum. 2002;33:291-298
122. Ward K.Geography and public policy: A recent history of ‘policy relevance’.Progress in Human Geography. 2005;29 (3): 310-319
123. Ward K.Geography and public policy: Towards public geographies.Progress in Human Geography. 2006;30 (4): 495-503
124. Whatmore S.Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world.Cultural Geographies. 2006;13 (4): 600-609
125. Wilsdon J,Willis RSee-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos; 2004:
126. Woods M,Gardner G.Applied policy research and critical human geography: Some reflections on swimming in murky waters.Dialogues in Human Geography. 2011;1 (2): 198-214
127. Wynne B.Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm.Global Environmental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions. 1992;2 (2): 111-127
128. Wynne B.Public uptake of science: A case for institutional reflexivity.Public Understanding of Science. 1993;2 (4): 321-337
129. Wynne BRisk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Lash SSzerszynski BWynne B, ed. London: SAGE; 1996:44-83.
130. Wynne B.Reflexing complexity: Post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science.Theory, Culture and Society. 2005;22 (5): 67-94
131. Wynne B.Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes, but missing the music?.Community Genetics. 2006;9 (3): 211-220
132. Wynne B.Dazzled by the mirage of influence? STS-SSK in multivalent registers of relevance.Science Technology and Human Values. 2007;32 (4): 491-503
133. Wynne B.Correspondence. Intolerance: science informs, not defines.Nature. 2011;471 (7338): 305
134. Yakhlef A.The three facets of knowledge: A critique of the practice-based learning theory.Research Policy. 2010;39 (1): 39-46