Despotism and democracy in the United Kingdom: Experiments in reframing citizenship

Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 239-261

  Doubleday, Robert ^a   Wynne, Brian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894707955     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. AEBC. 2001. Crops on trial. London: Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology Commission.
2. Arendt, Hannah. 2005. The promise of politics, ed. Jerome Kohn. New York: Schocken Books.
3. BBSRC. 2004. Review of BBSRC-funded research relevant to crop science: A report for BBSRC council, April 2004. Swindon, UK: Biotechnology and Bioscience Research Council.
4. Burke, Derek. 2004. GM food and crops: What went wrong in the UK? European Molecular Biology Organisation Reports 5: 432 -436.
5. Doubleday, Robert. 2004. Institutionalising NGO dialogue at Unilever: Framing the public as "consumer-citizens." Science & Public Policy 31 (2): 117 -126.
6. Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The descent of Icarus: Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
7. Grove-White, Robin. 1997. Science, trust and social change. In Science, policy and risk: A discussion meeting held at the Royal Society on Tuesday, 18 March 1997, 53 -58. Science in Society (1). London: Royal Society.
8. Grove-White, Robin. 2001. New wine, old bottles: Personal refl ections on the new biotechnology commissions. Political Quarterly 72 (4): 466 -472.
9. Grove-White, Robin, Phil Macnaghten, Sue Mayer, and Brian Wynne. 1997. Uncertain world: Genetically modified organisms, food, and public attitudes in Britain. Lancaster: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change.
10. Grove-White, Robin, Phil Macnaghten, and Brian Wynne. 2000. Wising up: The public and new technologies. Lancaster: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change.
11. Horlick-Jones, Tom, John Walls, Gene Rowe, Nick Pidgeon, Wouter Poortinga, Graham Murdock, and Tim O'Riordan. 2007. The GM debate: Risk, politics and public engagement. London: Routledge.
12. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 2000. Third report: Science and society. House of Lords papers 1999-00, 38 HL. London: The Stationery Office.
13. Iles, Alastair. 2004. Making seafood sustainable: Merging consumption and citizenship in the United States. Science & Public Policy 31 (2): 127 -138.
14. Irwin, Alan. 2006. The politics of talk. Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299 -320.
15. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of knowledge: The Co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
17. Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2): 119 -146.
18. Kamara, Mercy. 2009. The typology of the game that American, British, and Danish crop and plant scientists play. Minerva.
19. Lezaun, Javier, and Linda Soneryd. 2007. Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16: 279 -297.
20. Marris, Claire, Brian Wynne, P. Simmons, and Sue Weldon. 2001. Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnologies in Europe. Final report of the PABE research project. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
21. Phillips, Lord Nicholas of Worth Matravers. 2000. The Inquiry into BSE and Variant CJD in the United Kingdom.< http://collections.europarchive.org /tna /20090505194948/http:/bseinquiry.gov.uk >.
22. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP). 2008. 27th report: Novel materials in the environment: The case of nanotechnology. Norwich, UK: The Stationery Office.
23. Royal Society. 1985. The public understanding of science. London: Royal Society.
24. Royal Society. 2009. Reaping the benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. London: Royal Society.
25. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering.
26. Sainsbury, Lord. 2004. Quoted in "When disenchantment leads to disengagement." Research Fortnight, January 26, 2005.
27. Schofield, Geraldine. 2002. Interview with Robert Doubleday, October 8.
28. Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
29. Stengel, Katrina, Jane Taylor, Claire Waterton, and Brian Wynne. 2009. Plant sciences and the public good. Science, Technology & Human Values 34 (3): 289 -312.
30. Stirling, Andrew, and Sue Mayer. 1999. Rethinking risk: A pilot of multi-criteria mapping of a genetically modified crop in agricultural systems in the UK. Brighton: SPRU.
31. van Dooren, Thom. 2009. Banking seed: Use and value in the conservation of agricultural diversity. Science as Culture 18 (4): 373 -395.
32. van Lente, Harro. 1993. Promising technology: The dynamics of expectations in technological developments. PhD thesis. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
33. van Zwanenberg, Patrick, and Erik Millstone. 2005. BSE: Risk, science, and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Webster, Andrew. 1989. The privatization of public research: The case of the plant breeding institute. Science & Public Policy 16: 224 -232.
35. Wynne, Brian. 1991. Knowledges in context. Science, Technology & Human Values 16 (1): 1 -21.
36. Wynne, Brian. 1992. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and the public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1 (3): 281 -304.
37. Wynne, Brian. 1993. Public uptake of science: A case for institutional refl exivity. Public Understanding of Science 2: 321 -337.
38. Wynne, Brian. 2001. Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture 10 (4): 445 -481.
39. Wynne, Brian. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science: Hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics 9: 211 -220.
40. Wynne, Brian. 2011. Introduction: a retrospect. In Rationality and Ritual: the Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain. Chalfont St. Giles, UK: British Society for History of Science; republished London: Earthscan.