Precaution, foresight and sustainability: Reflection and reflexivity in the governance of science and technology

Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 225-272

  Stirling, Andy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881795329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (221)

1. Adam, B., U. Beck and J. van Loon (2000), The Risk Society and Beyond: critical issues for social theory, London: Sage.
2. Alvesson, M. and K. Skoldberg (2000), Reflexive Methodology, London: Sage.
3. Amendola, A., S. Contini and I. Ziomas (1992), 'Uncertainties in chemical risk assessment: results of a European benchmark exercise', Journal of Hazardous Materials, 29, 347-63.
4. Arrow, K. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Arthur,W. (1989), 'Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events', Economic Journal, 99.
6. Barnes, B. and D. Edge (1982), Science in Context: readings in the sociology of science, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
7. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: towards a new modernity, London: Sage.
8. Beck, U. (1994), 'The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of reflexive modernization', in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds), Reflexive Modernisation: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Beck, U., A. Giddens and S. Lash (1994), Reflexive Modernisation: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Berkhout, F., J. Hertin and A. Jordan (2001), 'Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as learning machines', Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 3, Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
11. Berkhout, F., A. Smith and A. Stirling (2004), 'Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts' in B. Elzen, F. Geels and K. Green (eds), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: theory, evidence and policy, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
12. Berlinski, D. (1976), On Systems Analysis: An essay concerning the limitations of same mathematical models in the social, political, biological sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Bernstein, P. (1996), 'Against the Gods: the remarkable story of risk', London: Wiley.
14. Bezembinder, T. (1989), 'Social choice theory and practice', in C. Vlek and D. Cvetkovitch, Social Decision Methodology for Technical Projects, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15. Bijker, W. (1995), Of Bicycles, Bakelite and Bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Blair, T. (2000), T. Blair, speech delivered by the UK Prime Minister to The European Bioscience Conference, London, Monday, 20 November, available at: http://www.monsanto.co.uk/news/ukshowlib.phtml?uid=4104.
17. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. (1994), 'The precautionary principle in Germany: enabling government', in T. O'Riordan and J. Cameron (eds), Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, London: Cameron May.
18. Bohmann, J. (1996), Public Deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Bonner, J. (1986), Politics, Economics and Welfare: an elementary introduction to social choice, Brighton: Harvester Press.
20. Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Boyce, A. (1996), Environment Technology: preserving the legacy, Chichester : Wiley.
22. Brealey, R. and S. Myers (1988), Principles of Corporate Finance, 3rd edn, New York: McGraw Hill.
23. Brooks, H. (1986), 'The typology of surprises in technology, institutions and development', in W.C. Clark and R.E. Munn (eds) (1986), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Brown, G. (2004), Speech delivered by the UK Chancellor to UK Government Conference on Advancing Enterprise, London, 26 January, available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/newsroom_and_speeches/speeches/chancellorexchequer/speech_chex_260104.cfm.
25. Byrd, D. and C. Cothern (2000), 'Introduction to Risk Analysis: a systematic approach to science-based decision making', Government Institutes, Rockville Maryland.
26. Callon, M., J. Law and A. Rip (1986), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: sociology of science in the real world, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
27. CEC, (2000), 'Towards a European Research Area', Communication from the Commission to the Council, COM(2000)6, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, January.
28. Clark, W. and T. Bradshaw (2004), Agile Energy Systems, London: Elsevier.
29. Clemen, R. (1996), Making Hard Decisions, 2nd edn., Belmont: Duxbury.
30. Collingridge, D. (1980), The Social Control of Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
31. Collingridge, D. (1982), Critical Decision Making: a new theory of social choice, London: Pinter.
32. Collingridge, D. (1983), Technology in the Policy Process: controlling nuclear power, London: Pinter.
33. CST, UK Council for Science and Technology (2000), 'Technology Matters: report on the exploitation of science and technology by UK business', London: HMSO, February.
34. Cyranski, J. (1986), 'The probability of a probability', in L. Justice (ed), Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. David, P. (1985), 'Clio and the Economics of QWERTY', American Economic Review, 75, 332-7.
36. Davies, G., J. Burgess,M. Eames, S.Mayer, K. Staley, A. Stirling and S.Williamson (2003), 'Deliberative mapping: appraising options for addressing "the Kidney Gap"', final report to Wellcome Trust, June, available at: http://www.deliberativemapping.org/.
37. De Finetti, N. (1974), Theory of Probability, New York: Wiley.
38. De Marchi, B., S. Funtowicz, C. Gough A. Guimaraes Pereira and E. Rota (1998), 'The Ulysses voyage', ULYSSES at JRC, EUR 17760EN Ispra: Joint Research Centre - EC, available at: http://zit1.zit.tu-darmstadt.de/ulysses/tutorial.htm.
39. DEFRA,L. Cornish and C.Porro (2002), 'Science for Sustainability' DEFRAAgency Review, UK Department for Environment and Rural Affairs, London, December.
40. DEFRA, (2004), 'Sustainable development indicators in your pocket', London: HMSO, at: http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/indicators/sdiyp/sdiyp04a4.pdf.
41. Dennett, D. (1996), Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, London: Penguin.
42. Dodgson, J.,M. Spackman, A. Pearman and I. Phillips (2001), Multicriteria analysis: a manual, London: Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, HMSO.
43. Dosi,G. (1982), 'Technological paradigms and technological trajectories', Research Policy, 11.
44. Dosi, G. and M. Egidi (1987), 'Substantive and procedural uncertainty, an exploration of economic behaviours in complex and changing environments', SPRU DRC discussion paper no. 46, 1987, SPRU, Sussex.
45. Dovers, S. and J. Handmer (1992), 'Ignorance, the precautionary principle and sustainability', Ambio, 24 (2), 92-7.
46. Dryzek, J. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: liberals, critics, contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Dryzek, J. and S. Niemeyer (2003), 'Pluralism and consensus in political deliberation', paper presented to the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 28-31 August.
48. Dubois, D., H. Prade and H. Farreny (1988), Possibility Theory: an approach to computerised processing of uncertainty, New York: Plenum.
49. Dyson,G. (1998), Darwin among the Machines: the Evolution of Global Intelligence, London: Penguin.
50. EEA (2000), 'Chemicals in the European Environment: Low Doses, High Stakes?', Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
51. EEA (D. Gee, P. Harremoes, J. Keys, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, S. Vaz and B. Wynne 2001), Late Lesson from Early Warnings: the precautionary principle 1898-2000, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
52. European Science and Technology Observatory (1999), 'On "science" and "precaution" in The Management of technological risk', volume I: synthesis study report to the EU Forward Studies Unit by European Science and Technology Observatory (ESTO), IPTS, Sevilla, EUR19056 EN, available at: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/eur19056IIen.pdf.
53. Europta, L. Kluver et al. (2002), 'European participatory technology assessment: participatory methods in technology assessment and technology decisionmaking', Danish Board of Technology, Copenhagen, available at: http://www.tekno.dk/pdf/projekter/europta_Report.pdf.
54. Faber, M. and J. Proops (1994), Evolution, Time, Production and the Environment, Berlin: Springer.
55. Farber, S. (1995), 'Economic resilience and economic policy', Ecological Economics, 15, 105-7.
56. Farman, J. (2001), 'Halocarbons, the ozone layer and the precautionary principle', in EEA, 2001.
57. Feyerabend, P. (1975), Against Method, London: Verso.
58. Feyerabend, P. (1978), Science in a Free Society, London: Verso.
59. Fiorino, D. (1989), 'Environmental risk and democratic process: a critical review', Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14, 501.
60. Fischer, F. (1990), Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61. Fischoff, Baruch (1995), 'Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Progress', Risk Analysis, 15 (2), 137-45.
62. Fisher, E. and R. Harding (eds) (1999), Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle, Sydney: Federation Press.
63. Ford, J. (1983), Choice, Expectation and Uncertainty: an appraisal of G.L.S. Shackles Theory, Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble.
64. Forster,M. (1999), 'How do simple rules "fit to reality" in a complex world?', Minds and Machines, 9, 543-64.
65. Funtowicz, S. and J. Ravetz, (1989), 'Managing the Uncertainties of Statistical Information', in J. Brown (ed.), Environmental Threats, London: Pinter, pp. 95-117.
66. Funtowicz, S. and J.Ravetz (1990), S. Funtowicz, J.Ravetz, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Amsterdam: Kluwer.
67. Giddens, A. (1976), The New Rules of Sociological Method, London: Hutchinson.
68. Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
69. Gouldner,A. (1970), The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, London: Heinemann.
70. Grabher, G. and D. Stark (1997), 'Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism', Regional Studies, 31 (5), 533-44.
71. Graedel, T. and B. Allenby (2002), Industrial Ecology, 2nd edn, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
72. Grin J., H. van de Graaf, and R. Hoppe (1997), Technology Assessment through Interaction: a guide, The Hague: Rathenau Institute.
73. Grove-White, R., P. Macnaghten, S. Mayer and B.Wynne (1997), 'Uncertain world. Genetically modified organisms, food and public attitudes in Britain', Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University.
74. Grove-White, R., P. Macnaghten and B. Wynne (2000), 'Wising up: the public and new technologies', Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University.
75. Grupp,H. and Linstone H. (1999), 'National technology foresight activities around the globe: resurrection and new paradigms', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60, 85-94.
76. Hacking, I. (1975), The Emergence of Probability: a philosophical study of early ideas about probability induction and statistical inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Hanley, N. and C. Spash (1993), Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
78. Hales, S. and R. Welshon (2000), Nietzsche's Perspectivism, Illinois University Press.
79. Hansen, A. and C. Clausen (2000), 'From participative TA to TA as participant in the social shaping of technology', TA Datanebank Nachrichten, 3 (9), October.
80. Harremoes, P. (2000), 'Methods for integrated assessment', paper to International Workshop on Information for Sustainable Water Management, Nunspeet, The Netherlands, 25-28 September.
81. Hayek, F. von (1978), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, Chicago University Press.
82. Hey, E. (1992), The Precautionary Principle and the LDC, Erasmus University.
83. HMT(2004), 'Science and innovation investment framework', 2004-2014, London: HMTreasury, July, available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/spending_review/spend_sr04/associated_documents/spending_sr04_science.cfm.
84. Hogwood, B. and L. Gunn (1984), Policy Analysis for the Real World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Holling, C. (1994), 'Simplifying the complex: the paradigms of ecological function and structure', Futures, 26 (6), 598-609.
86. Hughes, T. (1983): Networks of Power: electrification in western society 1880-1930, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
87. Hunt, J. (1994), 'The social construction of precaution', in T. O'Riordan and J. Cameron Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, London: Earthscan.
88. Irvine, J. and B. Martin (1984), Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners, London: Pinter.
89. Irwin, A. (1995), Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development, London: Routledge.
90. Jackson, T. and P. Taylor (1992), 'The precautionary principle and the prevention of marine pollution', Chemistry and Ecology, 7, 123-34.
91. Jaeger, C., O. Renn, E. Rosa and T. Webler (2001), Risk: uncertainty and rational action, London: Earthscan.
92. Janssen, R. (1994), Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
93. Jasanoff, S. (1990), The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Jaulin, L., M. Kieffer, O. Didrit and É. Walter (2001), Applied Interval Analysis, London: Springer Verlag.
95. Jaynes, E. (1986), 'Bayesian methods: general background', in L. Justice (ed), Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Johnston, P., D. Santillo and R. Stringer (1998), 'Risk assessment and reality: recognizing the limitations', working paper, Exeter University.
97. Jordan, A. and T. O'Riordan (1998), 'The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental policy and politics', paper delivered to conference on 'Putting the Precautionary Principle into Practice: how to make "good" environmental decisions under uncertainty', London Resource Centre, April.
98. Joss, S. and J. Durant (1995), Public Participation in Science: the Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London: Science Museum.
99. Keepin, B. and B.Wynne (1982), 'Technical Analysis of IIASA Energy Scenarios', Nature, 312.
100. Kelly, J. (1978), Arrow Impossibility Theorems, New York: Academic Press.
101. Kemp, R., J. Schot and R. Hoogma (1998), 'Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management.' Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10 (2), 175-95.
102. Keynes, J. (1921), A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan.
103. Killick, T. (1995), 'Flexibility and economic progress', World Development, 23 (5), 721-34.
104. Klir, G. (1989), 'Is there more to uncertainty than some probability theorists might have us believe?', International Journal of General Systems, 15, 347-78.
105. Klir, G. and T. Folger (1988), Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty and Information, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
106. Kluver, L. et al. (2002), European Participatory Technology Assessment: participatory methods in technology assessment and technology decision-making, Danish Board of Technology: Copenhagen, available (April 2005) at http://www.tekno.dk/pdf/projecktor/ehropta_Report.pdf.
107. Knight, F. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
108. Kuhn, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
109. Kuhlmann, S. (1999), 'Distributed intelligence: combining evolution, foresight and technology assessment', IPTS Report, 40, 16-22.
110. Lash, S., B. Swerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) (1996), Risk, Environment and Modernity: towards a new ecology, London: Sage.
111. Lash, S. (2001), 'Technological forms of life', Theory, Culture and Society, 18 (1), 105-20.
112. Leach, M., I. Scoones and B. Wynne (eds) (2005), Science, Citizenship and Globalization, London: Zed.
113. Levidow, L., S. Carr, R. Schomberg and D.Wield (1998), 'European biotechnology regulation: framing the risk assessment of a herbicide-tolerant crop', Science, Technology and Human Values, 22 (4), 472-505.
114. Lindsay, R. (1995), 'Galloping Gertie and the precautionary principle: how is environmental impact assessment assessed?', in T.Wakeford and N.Walters, Science for the Earth, London: Wiley.
115. Lloyd, L. (2000), 'The tyranny of the L-shape curve', Science and Public Affairs, February.
116. Loasby, B. (1976), Choice, Complexity and Ignorance: an inquiry into economic theory and the practice of decision making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117. Loveridge, D. (ed.) (1996), Special issue on Technology Assessment, International Journal of Technology Management, 11 (5/6).
118. Luce, R. and H. Raiffa (1957), 'An axiomatic treatment of utility', in R. Luce and H. Raiffa (eds), Games and Decisions: introduction and critical survey,New York:Wiley.
119. Luhmann, N. (2000), The Reality of the Mass Media, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
120. Lumby, S. (1984), Investment Appraisal, 2nd edn. London: Van Nostrand.
121. MacGarvin, M. (1995), 'The implications of the precautionary principle for biological monitoring', Helgolander Meeresuntersuchunge, 49, 647-62.
122. MacKay, A. (1980), Arrow's Theorem: the paradox of social choice - a case study in the philosophy of economics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
123. Markman, H. (ed.) (1997), Environmental Management Systems and Cleaner Production, Chichester: Wiley.
124. Martin, B. (1995), 'A review of recent overseas programmes', Technology Foresight, 6, Office of Science and Technology, London.
125. Martin, B. and J. Irvine, (1989), Research Foresight: priority-setting in science, London: Pinter.
126. Martin, B. and R. Johnston (1999), 'Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60 (1), 37-54.
127. Martuzzi, M. and J. Tickner (eds) (2004), 'The precautionary principle: protecting public health and the environment and the future of our children',World Health Organisation Europe, Geneva, 2004.
128. McKenna, C. (1986), The Economics of Uncertainty, Brighton: Wheatsheaf- Harvester.
129. McKeown, B. and D. Thomas (1988), Q Methodology, Newbury Park: Sage.
130. Misa, T. and P. Brey (eds) (2003), Modernity and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
131. Mokyr, J. (1992), The Lever of Riches: technological creativity and economic progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
132. Morgan, M., M. Henrion and M. Small (1990), Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. Morris, J. (ed.) (2000), Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, London: Butterworth Heinemann.
134. Myers, S. (1984), 'Finance theory and financial strategy', Interfaces, 14.
135. Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Belknap.
136. Nietzsche, F. (1968), 'On truth and lies in an extra-moral sense', in W. Kaufmann (trans.), The Portable Nietzsche, New York: Viking Press.
137. Norris, R., E. Caswwell-Chen and M. Kogan (2002), Concepts in Integrated Pest Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
138. Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons (1995), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
139. NRC (United States National Research Council), H. Fineberg (1996), 'Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society', National Research Council Committee on Risk Characterization, Washington: National Academy Press.
140. O'Brien, M. (2000), Making Better Environmental Decisions: an alternative to risk assessment, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
141. O'Riordan, T. and J. Cameron (1994), Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, London: Earthscan.
142. O'Riordan, T. and A. Jordan (2001), Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, London: Cameron May.
143. Ortega Y Gasset, J. (1980), The Origin of Philosophy, New York: W. Norton. OED (1989), J. Simpson and E. Weiner, The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
144. Pellizzoni, L. (2001), 'The myth of the best argument: power deliberation and reason', British Journal of Sociology, 52 (1), 59-86.
145. Popper, K. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
146. Porter, T. (1995), Trust in Numbers, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
147. Quine, A. (1961), From a Logical Point of View, Harper and Rowe.
148. Raffensberger, C. and J. Tickner (eds) (1999), Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Washington: Island Press.
149. Ravetz, J. (1986), 'Usable Knowledge, usable ignorance: incomplete science with policy implications', in W.C. Clark and R.E. Munn (eds), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
150. Renn, O., T. Webler and P. Wiedemann (1995), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
151. Rip,A. (1995), 'Introduction of new technology: making use of recent insights from sociology and economics of technology', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7 (4), 417-31.
152. Rip, A. (ed.) (1998), 'Steering and effectiveness in a developing knowledge society', proceedings of a workshop at the University of Twente, Utrecht: Uitgeverij Lemma.
153. Rip, A., T. Misa and J. Schot (1996), Managing Technology in Society, London: Pinter.
154. Rosa, E. (1998), 'Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk', Journal of Risk Research, 1 (1), 15-44.
155. Rosenberg, N. (1996), 'Uncertainty and technological change', in R. Landau, T. Taylor and G. Wright (eds), The Mosaic of Economic Growth, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
156. Rotmans, J., R. Kemp and M. van Asselt (2001), 'More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy'. Foresight, 3 (1), 15-31.
157. Rowell, A. (1996), Green Backlash: Global Subversion of the Environment Movement, London: Routledge.
158. Rowe, W. (1994), 'Understanding uncertainty', Risk Analysis, 14 (5), 743-50.
159. Ruelle, D. (1991), Chance and Chaos, London: Penguin.
160. Sorrell, S., E. Malley, J. Schleich and S. Scott (2004), The Economics of Energy Efficiency: barriers to cost-effective investment, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
161. Sahal, D. (1985), 'Technological guideposts and innovation avenues', Research Policy, 14, 61-82.
162. Saltelli, A. (2001), 'Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment', EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, available at: http://www.ce.ncsu.edu/risk/pdf/saltelli.pdf, (December).
163. Sand, P. (2000), 'The precautionary principle: a European perspective', Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 6 (3), 445-58.
164. Schot, J. and A. Rip (1997), 'The past and future of constructive technology assessment', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54, 251-68.
165. Schot, J. (2001), 'Towards new forms of participatory technology development', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13 (1), 39-52.
166. Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson (1990), Divided We Stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
167. Sclove, R. (1995), Democracy and Technology, New York: Guilford Press.
168. Sen, A. (1970), Collective Choice and Social Welfare, North Holland.
169. Shackle, G. (1968), Uncertainty in Economics and Other Reflections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
170. Shackley, S. and B. Wynne (1996), 'Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary-ordering devices and authority', Science, Technology and Human Values, 21, 275-302.
171. Smith, M. and L. Marx (eds) (1994), Does Technology Drive History: the dilemma of technological determinism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
172. Smithson, M. (1989), Ignorance and Uncertainty: emerging paradigms, New York: Springer.
173. Spash, C., A. Holland and J. O'Neill (1998), 'Environmental values and wetland ecosystems, CVM, ethics and attitudes, research report by Cambridge Research for the Environment, Cambridge University, August.
174. Starr, C. (1969), 'Social Benefit versus Technological Risk: what is our society willing to pay for safety?', Science, 165, 1232-8.
175. Steier, F. (1991), Research and Reflexivity, London: Sage.
176. Stirling, A. (1997) 'Limits to the Value of External Costs', Energy Policy, 25 (5), 517-40.
177. Stirling, A. (1998), 'On the economics and analysis of diversity', SPRU electronic working paper no. 28, October, available at: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp28/sewp228.html.
178. Stirling, A. (1999), 'On "Science" and "Precaution" in the management of technological risk', report to the EU Forward Studies Unit, IPTS, Sevilla, EUR19056 EN.
179. Stirling, A. (2003), 'Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences', in F. Berkhout, M. Leach and I. Scoones (eds), Negotiating Change, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
180. Stirling, A. (2004), 'Opening up or closing down: analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology', in M. Leach, I. Scoones and B. Wynne (eds), Science, Citizenship and Globalisation, London: Zed.
181. Stirling, A. (2005), 'Opening up or closing down: analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology' in M. Leach, I. Scoones and B.Wynne (eds), Science and Citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement, London: Zed, pp. 218-31.
182. Stirling, A. and S. Mayer (1999), 'Rethinking risk: a pilot multi-criteria mapping of a genetically modified crop in agricultural systems in the UK', SPRU, University of Sussex.
183. Stirling, A. and S. Mayer (2000), 'Precautionary approaches to the appraisal of risk: a case study of a GM crop', International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 6 (3), October-December.
184. Stirling, A. and P. van Zwanenberg (2001), 'Background report on the implementation of precaution in the European Union', interim report to PRECAUPRI project, SPRU, Sussex University, December.
185. Stirling, A. and P. van Zwanenberg (2003), 'A general model for the precautionary regulation of risk', section B in the final report of EU STRATA project on 'Regulatory strategies and research needs to compose and specify a European policy on the application of the precautionary principle' (Precau Pri), Centre for Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, April, available at: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sprn/environment/precaupripdfs.html
186. Stone, K. (ed.) (1990), Environmental Challenge of the 1990s: pollution prevention, clean technologies and clean production, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
187. Sundgvist, T., P. Soderholm and A. Stirling (2004), 'Electric power generation: valuation of environmental costs', in C.J. Cleveland (ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy, San Diego: Academic Press.
188. Suter, G. (1990), 'Uncertainty in environmental risk assessment', in G. von Furstenberg (ed.), Acting under Uncertainty, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
189. Szekely, G. (1986), Paradoxes in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Dordrecht: Reidel.
190. Thompson, M. and M. Warburton (1985), 'Decision making under contradictory certainties: how to save the Himalayas when you can't find what's wrong with them', Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 12.
191. Thornton, J. (2000), 'Pandora's poison: on chlorine, health and a new environmental strategy', Cambridge, MA: MIT.
192. Tickner, J. (1999), 'A map towards precautionary decision-making', in C. Rattensberger and J. Tickner (eds), Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Washington DC: Island Press.
193. UNCED (1987), G. Brundtland, 'Our common future: report of the United Nations Commission on Environment and Development', Oxford: Oxford University Press.
194. UNCED (1992), Final Declaration of the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro.
195. UNDP (2000), M. Malloch Brown, Head United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), statement reported on UNDP website available at: http://www.undp.org/hdr2001/clips/newsweek1.pdf
196. USDA (2000), C.Woteki, 'The role of precaution in food safety decisions', remarks prepared for Under Secretary for Food Safety, Food Safety and Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, March.
197. Van den Berg, N., C. Dutilh and G. Huppes (1995), Beginning LCA: a Guide to Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Rotterdam: CML.
198. Van Zwanenberg, P. and E. Millstone, (2001), 'Mad cow disease' - 1980s-2000: how reassurances undermined precaution', in EEA 2001.
199. Van Zwanenberg, P. and A. Stirling (2004), 'Risk and precaution in the US and Europe', Yearbook of European Environmental Law, 3, 43-57.
200. Vlek, C. and D. Cvetkovitch (1989), Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
201. Vogel,D. (2000), 'The WTO vote: the wrong whipping boy', The American Prospect 11 (14), 5 June.
202. Von Winterfeldt, D. and W. Edwards (eds) (1986), Decision Analysis and Behavioural Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
203. Walker, W. (2000), 'Entrapment in large technical systems: institutional commitment and power relations', Research Policy, 29 (7-8), 833-46.
204. Wallsten, T. (1986), 'Measuring vague uncertainties and understanding their use in decision making', in von Winterfeldt and Edwards, 1986.
205. Watson, S. (1994), 'The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis', Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 45, 261-9.
206. Weale, A. (2000), Environmental Governance in Europe: an ever closer ecological union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
207. Weatherford, R. (1982), Philosophical Foundations of Probability Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
208. Werner, R. (2004), Designing Strategy: Scenario analysis and the art of making business strategy, New Jersey: Praeger.
209. Williams R. and D. Edge (1996), 'The social shaping of technology', Research Policy, 25, 865-99.
210. Wilsdon, J. and R.Willis (2004), See-through Science: why public engagement needs to move upstream, London: Demos, available at http://www.demos.co.uk/catalogue/paddlingupstream/.
211. Winkler, G. (1986), 'Necessity, chance and freedom', in von Winterfeldt and Edwards (eds), Decision Analysis and Behavioural Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
212. Winner, L. (1977), Autonomous Technology: technics out of control as a theme in political thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
213. Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Philosophical Investigations, (trans.), G. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.
214. Woolgar, S. (ed.) (1988), Knowledge and Reflexivity: new frontiers in the sociology of knowledge, London: Sage.
215. Wynne, B. (1975), 'The rhetoric of consensus politics: a critical review of technology assessment', Research Policy, 4.
216. Wynne, B. (1987), 'Risk perception, decision analysis and the public acceptance problem', in B.Wynne (ed.), Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: implementation and the dialectics of credibility, Berlin: Springer.
217. Wynne, B. (1992), 'Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm', Global Environmental Change, 111-27.
218. Wynne, B. (1996), 'May the sheep safely graze?' in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B.Wynne (eds), Risk Environment and Modernity: toward a new ecology, London: Sage, pp. 44-83.
219. Wynne, B. (1997), 'Methodology and institutions: value as seen from the risk field', J. Foster (ed.), Valuing Nature: economics, ethics and environment, London: Routledge.
220. Wynne, B. (2002), 'Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology: reflexivity inside out?', Current Sociology, 50 (30), 459-77.
221. Zadeh, L. and J. Kacprzyk (1992), Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, New York: Wiley.