How to speak for aquifers and people at the same time: Environmental justice and counter-network formation at a hazardous waste site

Geoforum

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 363-372

  Holifield, Ryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental justice; Hazardous waste; Minnesota; Networks; Science policy interface; Superfund

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; AQUIFER; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; GROUNDWATER; HAZARDOUS WASTE; SUPERFUND;

MINNESOTA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67349227203     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cox K.R. Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geography 17 1 (1998) 1-23
2. EPA, 1996. Environmental Justice Community/University Partnership Grants Program, Request for Applications (RFA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 1997. Federal Register, 61(239): 65210-65214.
3. EPA, 1998. Environmental Justice Fact Sheet: Community/University Partnership (CUP) Grants Program - 1995-98. EPA/300-F-97-002R, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2201A, Washington, DC.
4. EPA and MPCA, 1995. FY 1995 Year End Performance Review, St. Paul and Chicago.
5. Gupta, S., Van Houtven, G., Cropper, M.L., 1995. Do benefits and costs matter in environmental regulation? An analysis of EPA decisions under Superfund. In: Revesz, R.L., Stewart, R.B. (Eds.), Analyzing Superfund: Economics, Science, and Law. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp. 83-111.
6. Holifield R. Neoliberalism and environmental justice in the United States environmental protection agency: Translating policy into managerial practice in hazardous waste remediation. Geoforum 35 3 (2004) 285-297
7. Hunt R.J. Ground water modeling applications using the analytic element method. Ground Water 44 1 (2006) 5-15
8. Ishiyama N. Environmental justice and American Indian tribal sovereignty: case study of a land-use conflict in Skull Valley, Utah. Antipode 35 1 (2003) 119-139
9. Jasanoff, S., 1986. Risk management and political culture: a comparative study of science in the policy context. Social Research Perspectives: Occasional Reports on Current Topics; 12. New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
10. Jasanoff S. Science, politics, and the renegotiation of expertise at EPA. Osiris 7 (1992) 195-217
11. Jasanoff S. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. International Library of Sociology (2004), Routledge, London, New York
12. Jasanoff S., and Wynne B. Science and decisionmaking. In: Rayner S., and Malone E. (Eds). Human Choice and Climate Change (1998), Battelle Press, Columbus, OH
13. Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern (1993), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Latour B. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (2004), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
16. LLDRM, 1996. Tribal Superfund cooperative agreement for the Champion Superfund site in Cass Lake, Minnesota. Quarterly Progress Report, October 1 1995 to December 31 1995 and January 1 1996 to March 30 1996, Cass Lake, Minnesota.
17. Martin B., and Richards E. Scientific knowledge, controversy, and public decision making. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Petersen J.C., and Pinch T. (Eds). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (1995), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
18. McDonald M.G., and Harbaugh A.W. The history of MODFLOW. Ground Water 41 2 (2003) 280-283
19. Minnesota Sea Grant and Natural Resources Research Institute, 2002. Assessing and Communicating Risk: A Partnership to Evaluate a Superfund Site on Leech Lake Tribal Land. University of Minnesota Sea Grant Program Publication No. CT 13, Natural Resources Research Institute Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2002/23, Final Report to US EPA, Environmental Justice Program, Grant No. EQ825741.
20. MJ Environmental Consultants, 1997. Environmental Review Report: Champion Wood Treatment Facility, Prepared for Leech Lake Tribal Council, Cass Lake, MN, Duluth, MN.
21. MPCA, 1995. Five-Year Review Report, St. Regis Paper Company Site, Cass Lake, Minnesota, MPCA, St. Paul.
22. Murdoch J., and Marsden T. The spatialisation of politics: local and national actor-spaces in environmental conflict. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20 3 (1995) 368-380
23. Nakamura R.T., and Church T.W. Taming Regulation: Superfund and the Challenge of Regulatory Reform (2003), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
24. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2006. National Sea Grant College Network. NOAA (6 March 2006).
25. Nelkin D. Science controversies: the dynamics of public disputes in the United States. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Petersen J.C., and Pinch T. (Eds). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (1995), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
26. Olsthoorn T.N. A comparative review of analytic and finite difference models used at the Amsterdam Water Supply. Journal of Hydrology 226 3-4 (1999) 139-143
27. Scientific Software Group, 2006. SLAEM/MLAEM Description. Scientific Software Group. (22 February 2006).
28. Sheppard E. The spaces and times of globalization: place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography 78 3 (2002) 307-330
29. Strack O.D.L. Autobiographical sketch of Otto D.L. Strack. Ground Water 41 4 (2003) 550-554
30. Yearley S. The environmental challenge to science studies. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Petersen J.C., and Pinch T. (Eds). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (1995), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA