"my major is english, belive it or not:)" — participant orientations in nonnative/native text chat

CALICO Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 393-409

  Vandergriff, Ilona ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interaction; L2 Self; Language Expertise; Second Language Learning; Social Identity; Stance; Synchronous Computer mediated Communication (SCMC)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924803697     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11139/cj.30.3.393-409     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Arundale, R. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2(2), 193-217. doi: 10.1515/PR.2006.011
2. Averianova, I. (2012). The language of electronic communication and its implications for TEFL. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, 14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.004
3. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Belz, J., & Reinhardt, J. (2004). Aspects of advanced foreign language proficiency: Internet-mediated German language play. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 324-362. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00069.x
5. Brouwer, C., Rasmussen, G., & Wagner, J. (2004). Embedded corrections in second language talk. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 75-92). London/New York: Continuum.
6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
8. Crystal, D. (2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Crystal, D. (2005) Txting. The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Danet, B. (1998) Text as mask: Gender and identity on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer mediated communication and community (pp. 129-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Danet, B. (2001) Cyberpl@y: Communicating online. New York: Berg.
12. Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1997). Hmmm. Where’s that smoke coming from?” Writing, play and performance on internet relay chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4), np. Retrieved January 30, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/danet.html
13. del-Teso-Craviotto, M. (2006). Language and sexuality in Spanish and English dating chats. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 460-480. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00288.x
14. Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249-268. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x
15. Du Bois, J. (2002, November) Stance and consequence. Paper given at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans.
16. Du Bois, J. (2007) Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
17. Fisher, K., Phelps, R., & Ellis, A. (2000). Group processes online: Teaching collaboration through collaborative processes. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 484-495.
18. Gass, S. M., & Varonis E. M. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. M. Gass and C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
19. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1986). Sex differences in non-native speaker/nonnative speaker interactions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327-351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
20. Georgakopoulou, A. (2005). Computer-mediated communication. In J.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics online (pp. 1-20). (Loose-leaf). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://www.benjamins.com/online/hop/
21. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
22. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Random House.
23. Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 447-463. doi: 10.1177/0261927X04269587
24. Hauser, E. K. (2003). "Corrective recasts” and other-correction of language form in interaction among native and nonnative speakers of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai‘i.
25. Heritage, J. (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In M. J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Herring, S. C. (1999) 1999. Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved February 20, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
27. Herring, S. C. (2001) Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4(1). Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761
29. Hosoda, Y. (2000). Other-repair in Japanese conversations between nonnative and native speakers. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 39-65.
30. Hosoda, Y. (2002) Analyzing Japanese native-nonnative speaker conversation: Categories, other-repair, and production delay. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.
31. Hosoda, Y. (2006). Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 25-50. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami022
32. Kalin, M. (1995). Coping with problems of understanding: Repair sequences in conversations between native and non-native speakers (No. 36). University of Jyväskylä.
33. Kasper, G. (2004) Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 551-567. doi: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x
34. Kasper, G., & Ross, S. (2003). Repetition as a source of miscommunication in oral proficiency interviews. In J. House, G. Kasper & S. Ross (Eds.), Misunderstanding in social life (pp. 82-106). Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson Education.
35. Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106. doi: 10.1080/01587910802004860
36. Kehrwald, B. (2010). Being online: Social presence as subjectivity in online learning. London Review of Education, 8(1), 39-50. doi: 10.1080/14748460903557688
37. Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(7), 1083-1110. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00048-5
40. Lantolf, J. (1996). Second language acquisition theory-building: 'Letting all the Flowers Bloom!' Language Learning, 46(4), 713-749.
41. Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
43. Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Liddicoat, A. (1997). Interaction, social structure, and second language use: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 313-317. doi: 10.2307/329305
45. Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
46. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition, 26, 413-468. doi: 10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
47. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377-405. doi: 10.2307/3588028
49. North, S. (2007). ‘The voices, the voices’: Creativity in online conversation. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 538-555. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm042
50. Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9-31. doi: 10.2307/3587803
51. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493-527. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x
52. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 115-132). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
53. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and second language learning (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
54. Rampton, B. (1990). ‘Displacing the ‘‘native speaker’’: Expertise, affiliation and inheritance,’ ELT Journal, 44(2), 97-101. doi: 10.1093/elt/44.2.97
55. Rellstab, D. H. (2007). Staging gender online: Gender plays in Swiss Internet relay chats. Discourse & Society, 18(6), 765-787. doi: 10.1177/0957926507082195
56. Ricento, T. (2005). Considerations of identity in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning (pp. 895-911). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Rouzie, A. (2001) Conversation and carrying-on: Play, conflict, and serio-ludic discourse in synchronous computer conferencing. College Composition and Communication, 53(2), 251-299. doi: 10.2307/359078
58. Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96-120. Retrieved February 2, 2012, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/sauro.pdf
59. Sauro, S. (2013). The cyber language exchange: Cross-national computer-mediated interaction. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 129-146). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
60. Scarcella, R., & Higa, C. (1981). Input, negotiation, and age differences in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31(2), 409-438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01392.x
61. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382. doi: 10.2307/413107
62. Shea, D. P. (1994). Perspective and production: Structuring conversational participation across cultural borders. Pragmatics, 4(3), 357-389.
63. Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
64. Tu, C.H. (2000). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in CMC environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 27-37. doi: 10.1006/jnca.1999.0099
65. Tu, C.H. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38(1), 45-60. doi: 10.1080/095239800100 21235
66. Tudini, V. (2010) Online second language acquisition. Conversation analysis of online chat. New York: Continuum.
67. Vandergriff, I. (2013). A pragmatic investigation of emoticon use. Manuscript submitted for publication.
68. Vandergriff, I., & Fuchs, C. (2009). Does CMC promote language play? Exploring humor in two modalities. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 26-47.
69. Vandergriff, I., & Fuchs, C. (2012). How to Laugh Online-Humor Support in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication (SCMC)” HUMOR. International Journal of Humor Research, 25(4), 437-458.
70. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
71. van Lier, L., & Matsuo, N. (2000). Varieties of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11(2), 265-287.
72. Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1985a). Miscommunication in native/non-native conversation. Language in Society, 14(3), 327-343.
73. Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985b). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90. doi: 10.1093/applin/6.1.71
74. Warner, C. (2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning and Technology 8(2), 69-87. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/warner/default.html
75. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90. doi: 10.1177/009365092019001003
76. Walther, J. B., & Tidwell, L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 5(4), 355-378. doi: 10.1080/10919399509540258
77. Wong, J. (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/nonnative speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244-267. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.2.244