On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 27-37

  Tu, Chih Hsiung ^a,b,c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b National Hualien Teachers College   (Taiwan)

^c NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002398017     PISSN: 10848045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jnca.1999.0099     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. R. E. Rice 1993. Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organization media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
2. J. A. Short, E. Williams & B. Christie 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
3. J. B. Walther 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research 19(1), 52-90.
4. J. B. Walther & J. K. Burgoon 1992. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
5. C. H. Tu 1999. The Social Impacts of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) on Chinese Teachers' Authority. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference.
6. A. Bandura 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. F. Biocca 1997. The Cyborg's dilemma: Embodiment in virtual environments. In Second Cognitive Technology Conference.
8. C. N. Gunawardena 1995. Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
9. C. N. Gunawardena & F. J. Zittle 1997. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
10. E. I. Perse, P. Burton, E. Kovner, M. E. Lears & R. J. Sen 1992. Predicting computer-mediated communication in a college class. Communication Research Reports, 9(2), 161-170.
11. J. K. Burgoon, D. B. Buller, J. L. Hale & M. deTurck 1984. Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10(3), 351-378.
12. M. Argyle & J. Dean 1965. Eye contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289-304.
13. M. Argyle & M. Cook 1976. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
14. M. Wiener & A. Mehrabian 1968. Language within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
15. M. Heilbronn & W. L. Libby 1973. Comparative effects of technological and social immediacy upon performance and perceptions during a two-person game. In Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.
16. J. Gorham 1988. The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behavior and student learning. Communication education, 37(1), 40-53.
17. G. Gumper 1990. Remote sex in the information age. In Talking to Stranger: Mediated Therapeutic Communication. (G. Gumper & S. L. Fish, eds.), Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 143-153.
18. R. E. Rice & G. Love 1987. Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
19. Reeves, Byron & Nass, I. The Media Equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Clifford 96. stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
20. E. Goffman 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
21. C. E. Osgood, G. J. Suci & P. H. Tannenbaum 1957. The Measure of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
22. R. Johansen, J. Vallee & K. Spangler 1988. Teleconferencing: Electronic group communication. In Small Group Communication: A Reader (R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar, eds.), 5th ed., Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future. 140-154.
23. M. L. McLaughlin 1986. Communication Yearbook 9 Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. B. G. Champness 1972. Attitudes towards person-person communications media. In Unpublished communications Studies Group Paper No. E/72011/CH. London: University College, London.
25. F. Williams & R. E. Rice 1983. Communication research and the new media technologies. In Communication Yearbook 7 (R. N. Bostrom ed.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 200-224.
26. A. B. Hollingshead & J. E. McGrath 1995. The whole is less than the sum of its parts: A critical review of research on computer-assisted groups. In Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. (R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas eds), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 46-78.
27. M. G. Ryan 1976. The influence of teleconferencing medium and status on participants' perception of the aestheticism, evaluation, privacy, potency, and activity of the medium. Human Communication Research, 2 255-261.
28. A. F. Phillips 1983. Computer conferences: Success or failure. In Communication Yearbook 7 (R. N. Bostrom, ed.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 837-856.
29. C. N. Gunawardena 1991. Collaborative learning and group dynamics in computer-mediated communication networks. In Research Monograph No. 9 of the Second American Symposium on Research in Distance Education. University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University: American Center for the Study of Distance Education. 14-24.
30. G. M. Garramone, A. C. Harris & R. Anderson 1986. Uses of political computer bulletin boards. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30(3), 325-339.
31. K. S. Bowers 1973. Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307-336.
32. J. B. Walther 1997. Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research. 23(3), 342-369.
33. B. S. Bloom 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
34. P. Kearney, T. G. Plax & N. Wendt-Wasco 1985. Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes. Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 61-74.
35. J. F. Anderson, R. W. Norton & J. F. Nussbaum 1981. Three investigations exploring the relationship between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education. 30, 377-372.
36. B. Murfin 1994. An analysis of computer-mediated communication between middle school students and scientist role models. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 2(3), 57-81.
37. A. Bandura & R. W. Jeffery 1973. Role of symbolic coding and rehearsal processes in observational learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 122-130.
38. V. P. Richmond, J. Gorham & J. C. McCroskey 1987. The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In Communication Yearbook 10 (M. McKaughlin, ed.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 574-590.
39. V. P. Richmond, J. C. McCroskey, P. Kearney & T. G. Plax 1987. Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1-12.
40. D. H. Kelley & J. Gorham 1988. Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37(3), 198-207.
41. L. S. Vygotsky 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. E. M. Reid 1991. Electropolis: Communication and Community On Internet Relay Chat. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
43. J. B. Walther 1995. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science. 6(2), 186-203.
44. S. M. Miller 1995. Vygotsky and education. In The Sociocultural Genesis of Dialogic Thinking in Classroom Contexts for Open-forum Literature Discussions.
45. M. M. Freire 1994. A social-cultural/semiotic interpretation of intercommunication mediated by computers. In International conference. - L. S. Vygotsky and the Contemporary Human Science.
46. J. V. Wertsch & P. Tulviste 1992. L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 1-10.
47. D. I. Altheide 1995. An Ecology of Communication: Cultural Formats of Control. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
48. Y. M. Lotman 1988. Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 32-51.
49. J. V. Wertsch & C. Toma 1991. Discourse and Learning in the Classroom: A Sociocultural Approach. Georgia: University of Georgia.