Being online: Social presence as subjectivity in online learning

London Review of Education

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 39-50

  Kehrwald, Benjamin ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

E learning; Online learning; Social presence; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649312344     PISSN: 14748460     EISSN: 14748479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14748460903557688     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biocca, F., J. Burgoon, C. Harms, and M. Stoner. 2001. Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Paper presented at Presence 2001: 4th International Workshop, Philadelphia.
2. Biocca, F., C. Harms, and J. Burgoon. 2003. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, no. 5: 456-80.
3. Biocca, F., C. Harms, and J. Gregg. 2001. The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. In Presence 2001: 4th International Workshop. Philadephia.
4. Caspi, A., and I. Blau. 2008. Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychological Education 11, no. 3: 323-46.
5. Collins, M., and K.L. Murphy. 1997. Development of communications conventions in instructional electronic chats. Journal of Distance Education 12, no. 1/2: 177-200.
6. Daft, R.L., and R.H. Lengel. 1986. A proposed integration among organisational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Managment Science 32: 554-71.
7. de Sousa, R. 2002. Twelve varieties of subjectivity: Dividing in hopes of conquest. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Science Society meeting, San Sebastian, Spain. http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~sousa/subjectivity.html.
8. Floridi, L. 2005. The philosophy of presence: From epistemic failure to successful observation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14, no. 6: 656-67.
9. Frank, A.W. 2005. What is dialogical research, and why should we do it? Qualitative Health Research 15, no. 7: 964-74.
10. Garrison, D.R. 2007. Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11, no. 1: 61-72.
11. Gunawardena, C.N. 1995. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1, no. 2/3: 147-66.
12. Gunawardena, C.N., and R. Zittle. 1996. An examination of teaching and learning processes in distance education and implications for designing instruction. In Distance Education Symposium 3: Instruction, ed. M.F. Beaudoin, 51-63. State College, PA: American Center for the Study of Distance Education.
13. Kehrwald, B.A. 2007. Social presence and learner support: Understanding learners' experiences with mediated social processes in text-based online learning environments. PhD diss., University of Southern Queensland.
14. Kehrwald, B.A. 2008. Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education 29, no. 1: 89-106.
15. McIsaac, M.S., J.M. Blocher, V. Mahes, and C. Vrasidas. 1999. Student and teacher perceptions of interaction in online computer-mediated communication. Educational Media International 36, no. 2: 121-31.
16. McLeod, P.L., R.S. Baron, and M.W. Marti. 1997. The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, no. 5: 706-18.
17. Nowak, K., and F. Biocca. 2001. Understanding the influence of agency and anthropomorphism on copresence, social presence and physical presence with virtual humans. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, no. 5: 481-94.
18. Pares, N., and R. Pares. 2006. Towards a model for a virtual reality experience: The virtual subjectiveness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, no. 5: 524-38.
19. Rourke, L., T. Anderson, D.R. Garrison, and W. Archer. 2001. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 14, no. 2: 50-71.
20. Sas, C., and G.M.P. O'Hare. 2003. Presence equation: An investigation into cognitive factors underlying presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, no. 5: 523-37.
21. Shin, N. 2002. Beyond interaction: The relational construct of 'transactional presence'. Open Learning 17, no. 2: 121-37.
22. Short, J., E. Williams, and B. Christie. 1976. The social psychology of communication. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
23. Stake, R.E. 2003. Case studies. In Strategies of qualitative inquiry, ed. Y.S. Linclon and N.K. Denzin. Housand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Steeples, C., C. Jones, and P. Goodyear. 2002. Beyond e-learning: A future for networked learning. In Networked learning: Perspectives and issues, ed. C. Steeples and C. Jones. London: Springer.
25. Tu, C.-H., and M. McIsaac. 2002. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education 16, no. 3: 131-50.
26. Walther, J. 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research 19, no. 1: 52-90.