Generalized Pairwise Correlation and method comparison: Impact assessment for JAR attributes on overall liking

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 43, Issue , 2015, Pages 88-96

  Gere, Attila ^a   Sipos, László ^a   Héberger, Károly ^b  

^a Institute of Entrepreneurship and Innovation   (Hungary)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Feature selection; Generalized Pairwise Correlation; Just About Right data analysis; Penalty analysis; Product optimization; Software

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924785611     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ASTM E253. Terminology relating to sensory evaluation of materials and products, Conshohocken: ASTM International.
2. ASTM E456. Terminology relating to quality and statistics, Conshohocken: ASTM International.
3. ASTM MNL63. Just-About-Right (JAR) scales: Design, usage, benefits, and risks, Conshohocken: ASTM International.
4. Cadena R.S., Bolini H.M.A. Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2012, 47(5):991-996.
5. Chan S.H., Moss B.W., Farmer L.J., Gordon A., Cuskelly G.J. Comparison of consumer perception and acceptability for steaks cooked to different endpoints: Validation of photographic approach. Food Chemistry 2013, 136(3-4):1597-1602.
6. Earthy P.J., Macfie H.J.H., Hedderley D. Effect of question order on sensory perception and preference in central location trials. Journal of Sensory Studies 1997, 12:215-237.
7. Epler S., Chambers E., Kemp K.E. Hedonic scales are a better predictor than Just-About-Right scales of optimal sweetness in lemonade. Journal of Sensory Studies 1998, 13(2):191-197.
8. Esmerino E.A., Cruz A.G., Pereira E.P.R., Rodrigues J.B., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. The influence of sweeteners in probiotic Petit Suisse cheese in concentrations equivalent to that of sucrose. Journal of Dairy Science 2013, 96(9):5512-5521.
9. Freitas D.D.C., Mattietto R.D. Ideal sweetness of mixed juices from Amazon fruits. Food Science and Technology 2013, 33:148-154.
10. Gacula M., Rutenbeck S., Pollack L., Resurreccion A.V.A., Moskowitz H.R. The Just-About-Right intensity scale. Functional analyses and relation to hedonics. Journal of Sensory Studies 2007, 22:194-211.
11. Goerlitz C.D., Delwiche J.F. Impact of label information on consumer assessment of soy-enhanced tomato juice. Journal of Food Science 2004, 69(9):S376-S379.
12. Héberger K., Rajkó R. Generalization of pair correlation method (PCM) for nonparametric variable selection. Journal of Chemometrics 2002, 16(8-10):436-443.
13. Héberger K., Rajkó R. Variable selection using pair-correlation method. Environmental applications. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 2002, 13(5):541-554.
14. Hong J.H., Yoon E.K., Chung S.J., Chung L., Cha S.M., O'Mahony M. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability of Bulgogi (Korean Traditional Barbecued Beef). Journal of Food Science 2011, 76(5):S306-S313.
15. ISO, 2005. Sensory analysis - Methodology - General guidance. International Standard 6658:2005.
16. Kilcast D. Sensory quality control for taint prevention. Sensory analysis for food and beverage quality control 2010, 156-185. Woodhead, Cambridge. D. Kilcast (Ed.).
17. Krishnamurthy R., Srivastava A.K., Paton J.E., Bell G.A., Levy D.C. Prediction of consumer liking from trained sensory panel information: Evaluation of neural networks. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18(2):275-285.
18. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 2010, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
19. Lawless L.J.R., Threlfall R.T., Meullenet J.F., Howard L.R. Applying a mixture design for consumer optimization of black cherry, Concord grape and pomegranate juice blends. Journal of Sensory Studies 2013, 28(2):102-112.
20. Næs T., Brockhoff P.B., Tomic O. Statistics for sensory and consumer science 2010, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, (pp. 11-34, 127-224).
21. Pages J., Berthelo S., Brossier M., Gourret D. Statistical penalty analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 32:16-23.
22. Plaehn D. What's the real penalty in penalty analysis?. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28(2):456-469.
23. Plaehn D., Horne J. A regression-based approach for testing significance of "Just-About-Right" variable penalties. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(1):121-132.
24. Popper R., Gibes K. Workshop summary: Data analysis workshop: Getting the most out of Just-About-Right data - Abstracts. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15(7-8):891-899.
25. Popper R., Rosenstock W., Schraidt M., Kroll B.J. The effect of attribute questions on overall liking ratings. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:853-858.
26. Rababah T.M., Al-u'datt M., Almajwal A., Brewer S., Feng H., Al-Mahasneh M. Evaluation of the nutraceutical, physiochemical and sensory properties of Raisin Jam. Journal of Food Science 2012, 77(6):C609-C613.
27. Rajkó R., Héberger K. Conditional Fisher's exact test as a selection criterion for pair-correlation method. Type I and Type II errors. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 57(1):1-14.
28. Sipos L., Kovács Z., Sági-Kiss V., Csiki T., Kókai Z., Fekete A. Discrimination of mineral waters by electronic tongue, sensory evaluation and chemical analysis. Food Chemistry 2012, 135(4):2947-2953.
29. Stone H., Sidel J. Sensory evaluation practices 2004, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, p. 92.
30. Wold S. PLS for multivariate linear modelling. QSAR: Chemometric methods in molecular design 1995, Vol. 2:195-218. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
31. Xiong R., Meullenet J.F. Application of multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) to the preference mapping of cheese sticks. Journal of Food Science 2004, 69(4):S131-S139.
32. Xiong R., Meullenet J.F. A PLS dummy variable approach to assess the impact of jar attributes on liking. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17(3-4):188-198.