Effect of question order on sensory perception and preference in central location trials

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 215-237

  Earthy, Philippa J ^a   MacFie, Halliday J H ^a   Hedderley, Duncan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031476995     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1997.tb00064.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BICKART, B.A. 1992. Question-order and brand evaluations: The moderating role of consumer knowledge. In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, (N. Schwarz and S. Sudman, eds.) pp. 63-80, Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. BICKART, B.A. 1993. Carry-over and backfire effects in marketing research. J. Marketing Res. 30, 52-62.
3. BISHOP, G.F., OLDENDICK, R.W. and TUCHFARBER, A.J. 1982a. Political information processing: Question order and context effects. Political Behaviour 4, 177-200.
4. GREENHOFF, K. and MACFIE, H.J.H. 1994. Preference mapping in practice. In Measurement of Food Preference, (H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thomson, eds.) pp. 137-166, Blackie Academic and Professional, London.
5. GRICE, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, (P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, eds.) pp. 41-58, Academic Press, New York.
6. HIGGINS, E.T., RHOLES, W.S. and JONES, C.R. 1977. Category accessibility and impression formation. J. Experimental Psychol. 13, 141-154.
7. KAHNEMAN, D. and TVERSKY, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 4, 163-291.
8. KALTON, G., COLLINS, M. and BROOK, L. 1978. Experiments in wording opinion questions. J. Royal Society: Applied Statistics. (Series 3) 27(2), 149-161.
9. KHAN, R.L. and CANNELL, C.F. 1957. The Dynamics of Interviewing. Wiley, New York.
10. KNOWLES, E.S. 1988. Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. J. Personality and Social Psychol. 55, 312-320.
11. MACFIE, H.J.H., BRATCHELL, N., GREENHOFF, K. and VALLIS, L.V. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sensory Studies 4, 129-148.
12. MARTIN, L.L. 1986. Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. J. Personality and Social Psychol. 57, 493-504.
13. MCCLENDON, M.J. and O'BRIEN, D.J. 1988. Question-order effects on the determinants of subjective well-being. Public Opinion Quarterly 52, 351-364.
14. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 2nd. Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl.
15. MELA, D.J. 1989. A comparison of single and concurrent evaluations of sensory and hedonic attributes. J. Food Sci. 54(4), 1098-1100.
16. MERTON, R.K. 1946. The focused interview. Am. J. Sociology 57, 541-557.
17. MOORTHY, S.K. 1991. Measuring overall judgements and attribute evaluations: Overall first vs. attribute first. MSI Report Summary: Technical Working Paper Report. Report No. 91-120. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
18. OTTATI, V.C., RIGOLE, E.J., WYER, R.S., SCHWARZ, N. and KUKLINSKI, J. 1989. Cognitive and affective bases of opinion survey responses. J. Personality and Social Psychol. 57, 404-415.
19. PETTY, R.E. and CACIOPPO, J.T. 1982. The need for cognition. J. Personality and Social Psychol. 42(1), 116-131.
20. SCHUMAN, H. and PRESSER, S. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments in Question Form, Wording and Context. Academic Press, New York.
21. SCHUMAN, H., PRESSER, S. and LUDWIG, J. 1981. Context effects on survey responses to questions about abortion. Public Opinion Quarterly 45, 216-223.
22. STEWART, D.W. and SHAMDASANI, P.N. 1991. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 20. Sage Publications, London.
23. STONE, H. and SIDEL, J.L. 1985. Sensory Evaluation Practices. Academic Press, London.
24. STRACK, F. 1992. "Order effects" in survey research: Activation and information functions of preceding questions. In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, (N. Schwarz and S. Sudman, eds.) pp. 23-34, Springer Verlag, New York.
25. STRACK, F. and MARTIN, L.L. 1987. Thinking, judging, and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys. In Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, (H.J. Hippler, N. Schwarz and S. Sudman, eds.) pp. 123-148, Springer-Verlag, New York.
26. SUDMAN, S. and BRADBURN, N. 1982. Asking Questions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
27. SUDMAN, S. and SCHWARZ, N. 1989. Contributions of cognitive psychology to advertising Research. J. Advertising Res. 29, 43-53.
28. TOURANGEAU, R. 1984. Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines, (T.B. Jabine, M.L. Strag, J.M. Tanur and R. Tourangeau, eds.) pp. 73-100, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
29. TOURANGEAU, R. 1992. Context effects on responses to attitude questions: Attitudes as memory structures. In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, (N. Schwarz and S. Sudman, eds.) pp. 35-48, Springer-Verlag, New York.
30. TOURANGEAU, R. and RASINSKI, K.A. 1988. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bull. 103, 299-314.
31. TURNER, C.F. 1984. Why do some surveys disagree? Some preliminary hypotheses and some disagreeable examples. In Surveying Subjective Phenomena, (C.F. Turner and E. Martin, eds.) Vol. 2, Russell Sage, New York.
32. VICKERS, Z.M., CHRISTENSEN, C.M., FAHRENHOTZ, S.K. and GENGLER, I.M. 1993. Effect of questionnaire design and the number of samples tasted on hedonic ratings. J. Sensory Studies 8, 189-200.
33. WILSON, T.D. 1990. Self-persuasion via self-reflection. In Self-Inference Processes, (J.M. Olson and M.P. Zanna, eds.) pp. 43-67, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
34. WILSON, T.D. and SCHOOLER, J.W. 1991. Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. J. Personality and Social Psychol. 60(2), 181-192.
35. WRIGHT, P.L. 1974. The harassed decision maker: Time pressure, distractions, and the use of evidence. J. Applied Psychol. 59, 555-561.