Gene flow of unique sequences between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus spretus

Mammalian Genome

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 225-230

  Greene Till, Rhonda ^a   Zhao, Yingping ^a   Hardies, Stephen C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED CBA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MURIDAE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; INVERTEBRATA; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; MUS SPRETUS; MUSCULUS;

EID: 0034058314     PISSN: 09388990     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003350010041     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bonhomme F (1986) Evolutionary relationships in the genus Mus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 127, 19-34
2. Bonhomme F, Martin S, Thaler L (1978) Hybridization between Mus musculus L. and Mus spretus Lataste under laboratory conditions. Experientia 34, 1140-1141
3. Bonhomme F, Benmehdi F, Britton-Davidian J, Martin S (1979) Genetic analysis of interspecific crosses Mus musculus L. × Mus spretus Lataste: linkage of Adh-1 with Amy-1 on chromosome 3 and Es-14 with Mod-1 on chromosome 9. C R Seances Acad Sci 289, 545-548
4. Bourset P, Din W, Anand R, Darviche D, Dod B et al. (1996) Origin and radiation of the house mouse: mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. J Evol Biol 9, 391-415
5. Clark JM (1988) Novel non-templated nucleotide addition reactions catalyzed by procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 16, 9677-9686
6. D'Aquilla RT, Bechtel LJ, Videler JA, Eron JJ, Gorczyca P et al. (1991) Maximizing sensitivity and specificity of PCR by preamplification heating. Nucleic Acids Res 19, 3749
7. Din W, Anand R, Bourset P, Darviche D, Dod B et al. (1996) Origin and radiation of the house mouse: clues from nuclear genes. J Evol Biol 9, 529-539
8. Ferris SC, Sage RD, Prager EM, Ritte U, Wilson AC (1983) Mitochondrial DNA evolution in mice. Genetics 105, 681-721
9. Festig MFW (1996) Origins and characteristics of inbred strains of mice. In Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse, Vol. 2, MF Lyon, S Raston, SDM Brown, eds. (New York: Oxford University Press), p 1544
10. Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20, 406-416
11. Fitch WM (1977) On the problem of discovering the most parsimonious tree. Am Nat 111, 223-257
12. Innis MA, Gelfand DH (1990) Optimization of PCRs. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Application, MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky, TJ White, eds. (San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press), pp 3-12
13. Johnson-Dow L, Mardis E, Heiner C, Roe BA (1987) Optimized methods for fluorescent and radio labeled DNA sequencing. Biotechniques 5, 754-765
14. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (1993) MEGA: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 1.0. (University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University)
15. Lee J (1991) Laboratory methods: alternative dideoxy sequencing of double-stranded DNA by cyclic reactions using Taq polymerase. DNA Cell Biol 10, 67-73
16. Mead DA, Pey NK, Hernstadt C, Marcil RA, Smith LM (1991) A universal method for direct cloning of PCR amplified nucleic acid. Biol Technology 9, 657-663
17. Morse HC III (1978) Introduction In Origins of Inbred Mice. HC Morse III ed. (New York: Academic Press), pp 3-21
18. Nagamine CM, Nishioka Y, Moriwaki K, Boursot P, Bonhomme F et al. (1992) The musculus-type Y chromosome of the laboratory mouse is of Asian origin. Mamm Genome 3, 84-91
19. Naggert JK, Mu JL, Frankel W, Bailey DW, Paigen B (1995) Genomic analysis of the C57BL/KsJ mouse strain. Mamm Genome 6, 131-133
20. Rikke BA, Hardies SC (1991) LINE-1 repetitive DNA probes for species-specific cloning from Mus spretus and Mus domesticus genomes. Genomics 11, 895-904
21. Rikke BA, Pinto LH, Gorin MB, Hardies SC (1991) Systematic identification of LINE-1 repetitive DNA sequence differences having species specificity between Mus spretus and Mus domesticus. J Mol Biol 219, 635-643
22. Rikke BA, Zhao Y, Daggett LP, Reyes R, Hardies SC (1995) Mus spretus LINE-1 sequences detected in the Mus musculus inbred strain C57BL/6J using LINE-1 DNA probes. Genetics 139, 901-906
23. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press)
24. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulsen AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74, 5463-5467
25. She JX, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Thaler L, Catzeflis FM (1990) Molecular phylogenies in the genus Mus: comparative analysis of electrophoretic, scnDNA hybridization and mtDNA RFLP data. Biol J Linnean Soc 41, 83-103
26. Slingsby JH, Hogarth MB, Simpson E, Walport MJ, Mosley BJ (1996) New microsatellite polymorphisms between C57BL/6J, C57BL/10, and C57BL/KsJ inbred mouse strains. Immunogenetics 43, 72-75
27. Strauss WM (1994) Preparation of genomic DNA from mammalian tissue. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1, FM Ausubel, R Brent, RE Kingston, DD Moore, JG Seidman, JA Smith, K Struhl, eds. (New York: John Wiley and Sons), pp 2.2.1-2.2.3
28. Toneguzzo F, Glynn S, Levi E, Mjolsness S, Hayday A (1988) Use of a chemically modified polymerase for manual and automated sequencing of supercoiled DNA. BioTechniques 6, 460-469
29. Zhao Y, Daggett LP, Hardies SC (1996) Mus spretus LINE-1s in the Mus musculus domesticus inbred strain C57BL/6J are from two different Mus spretus LINE-1 subfamilies. Genetics 142, 549-555
30. Zhao Y, Green-Till R, Hardies SC (1998) Mus spretus LINE-1s in C57BL/ 6J map to at least two different chromosomes. Mamm Genome 9, 679-680
31. Zhao Y, Jacobs CPD, Wang L, Hardies SC (1999) MuERVC: a new family of murine retroviral-related repetitive sequences and its relationship to previously known families. Mamm Genome 10, 477-481