Are Faces Special

Oxford Handbook of Face Perception

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  McKone, Elinor ^a   Robbins, Rachel ^b  

^a The Australian National University   (Australia)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Behavioral processing; Faces; Identity related information; Neural processing; Visual processing mechanism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924294051     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0009     Document Type: Chapter

References (133)

1. Adachi, I., Chou, D.P., and Hampton, R.R. (2009). Thatcher effect in monkeys demonstrates conservation of face perception across primates. Current Biology, 19, 1270-1273.
2. Anaki, D. and Bentin, S. (2009). Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects. Cognition, 111, 144-149.
3. Arzy, S., Thut, G., Mohr, C., Michel, C.M., and Blanke, O. (2006). Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8074-8081.
4. Ashworth, A.R.S., Vuong, Q.C., Rossion, B., and Tarr, M.J. (2007). Recognizing rotated faces and Greebles: What properties drive the face inversion effect? Visual Cognition, 16, 754-784.
5. Assal, G., Favre, C., and Anderes, J.P. (1984). Nonrecognition of familiar animals by a farmer: Zooagnosia or prosopagnosia for animals. Revue Neurologique (Paris), 140, 580-584.
6. Baker, C.I., Hutchison, T.L., and Kanwisher, N. (2007). Does the fusiform face area contain subregions highly selective for nonfaces? Nature Neuroscience, 10 (1), 3.
7. Boutet, I. and Faubert, J. (2006). Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 34, 854-864.
8. Bruyer, R. and Crispeels, G. (1992). Expertise in person recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 501-504.
9. Busey, T.A. and Vanderkolk, J.R. (2005). Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts. Vision Research, 45, 431-448.
10. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R.E., and Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243-1249.
11. Carey, S., Diamond, R., and Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition - A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257-269.
12. Corballis, M.C., Zbrodoff, N.J., Shetzer, L.I. and Butler, P.B. (1978). Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory & Cognition, 6, 98-107.
13. Crookes, K. and Mckone, E. (2008). Perceptual narrowing during development: How broad is the innate representation driving adult face-specificity? [Conference abstract]. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(Supp), 66.
14. Crookes, K. and Mckone, E. (2009). Early maturity of face recognition: Nochildhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition, 111, 219-247.
15. Curby, K.M., Glazek, K., and Gauthier, I. (2009). Perceptual expertise increases visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 94-107.
16. D'lauro, C., Tanaka, J.W., and Curran, T. (2008). The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 623-629.
17. Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., and Van Hoesen, G.W. (1982). Prosopagnosia: Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology, 32, 331-341.
18. Davidoff, J. and Donnelly, N. (1990) Object superiority: A comparison of complete and part probes. Acta Psychologica, 73, 225-243.
19. De Gelder, B., Bachoud-Levi, A.C., and Degos, J.D. (1998). Inversion superiority in visual agnosia may be common to a variety of orientation polarised objects besides faces. Vision Research, 38, 2855-2861.
20. Diamond, R., and Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
21. Downing, P.E., Jiang, Y.H., Shuman, M., and Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473.
22. Duchaine, B.C., Yovel, G., Butterworth, E., and Nakayama, K. (2006). Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 714-747.
23. Duchaine, B.C., Germine, L., and Nakayama, K. (2007). Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 419-430.
24. Furey, M.L., Tanskanen, T., Beauchamp, M.S., et al. (2006). Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 1065-1070.
25. Gauthier, I. and Bukach, C. (2007). Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? Cognition, 103, 322-330.
26. Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M.J. (1997) Becoming a "Greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37 (12), 1673-1682.
27. Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M.J. (2002). Unravelling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 431-446.
28. Gauthier, I., Williams, P.C., Tarr, M.J., and Tanaka, J.W. (1998). Training "greeble" experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38, 2401-2428.
29. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M.J., Anderson, A.W., Skudlarski, P., and Gore, J.C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.
30. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J.C., and Anderson, A.W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191-197.
31. Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M.J. (2002) Unravelling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 431-446.
32. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K.M., and Collins, D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428-432.
33. Ge, L., Wang, Z., Mccleery, J.P., and Lee, K. (2006). Activation of face expertise and the inversion effect. Psychological Science, 17, 12-16.
34. Golby, A.J., Gabrieli, J.D.E., Chiao, J.Y., and Eberhardt, J.L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 845-850.
35. Grill-Spector, K., Knouf, N., and Kanwisher, N. (2004). The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 555-562.
36. Grill-Spector, K., Sayres, R., and Ress, D. (2006). High-resolution imaging reveals highly selective nonface clusters in the fusiform face area. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1177-1185.
37. Grueter, M., Grueter, T., Bell, V., et al. (2007). Hereditary prosopagnosia: The first case series. Cortex, 43, 734-749.
38. Halgren, E., Raij, T., Marinkovic, K., Jousmaki, V., and Hari, R. (2000). Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 69-81.
39. Harel, A., Gilaie-Dotan, S., Malach, R., and Bentin, S. (2010). Top-down engagement modulates the neural expressions of visual expertise. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2304-2318.
40. Harley, E.M., Pope, W.B., Villablanca, J.P., et al. (2009). Engagement of fusiform cortex and disengagement of lateral occipital cortex in the acquisition of radiological expertise. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2746-2754.
41. Hsiao, J.H.-W. and Cottrell, G. (2009). Not all visual expertise is holistic, but it may be leftist: The case of Chinese character recognition. Psychological Science, 20 (4), 455-463.
42. Husk, J.S., Bennett, P.J., and Sekuler, A.B. (2007). Inverting houses and textures: Investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects. Vision Research, 47, 3350-3359.
43. Husk, J.S., Betts, L.R., O'craven, K.M., Bennett, P.J., and Sekuler, A.B. (2006). House training: Neural correlates of object learning [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6, 664a.
44. Jeffreys, D.A. (1996). Evoked potential studies of face and object processing. Visual Cognition, 3, 1-38.
45. Kanwisher, N., Mcdermott, J., and Chun, M.M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
46. Kanwisher, N. and Yovel, G. (2006). The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 2109-2128.
47. Kelly, D.J., Quinn, P.C., Slater, A., Lee, K., Ge, L., and Pascalis, O. (2007). The other-race effect develops during infancy: Evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychological Science, 18, 1084-1089.
48. Kendrick, K.M., Atkins, K., Hinton, M.R., Heavens, P., and Kevern, B. (1996). Are faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and object discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity. Behavioural processes, 38, 19-35.
49. Kennerknecht, I., Pluempe, N., and Welling, B. (2008). Congenital prosopagnosia: A common hereditary cognitive dysfunction in humans. Frontiers in Bioscience, 1, 3150-3158.
50. Kuefner, D., Jacques, C., Prieto, E.A., and Rossion, B. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain. Brain and Cognition, 74, 225-238.
51. Kung, C.-C., Peissig, J.J., and Tarr, M.J. (2007). Is region-of-interest overlap comparison a reliable measure of category specificity? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 2019-2034.
52. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C.J., Maurer, D., and Brent, H.P. (2004). Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science, 15, 762-768.
53. Leder, H. and Carbon, C.-C. (2005). When context hinders! Lean-test compatibility in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 235-250.
54. Leder, H. and Carbon, C.-C. (2006). Face-specific configural processing of relational information. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 19-29.
55. Liu, J., Tian, J., Lee, K., and Li, J. (2008). A study on neural mechanism of face processing based on fMRI. Progress in Natural Science, 18, 201-207.
56. Liu, J., Higuchi, M., Marantz, A., and Kanwisher, N. (2000). The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. Neuroreport, 11, 337-341.
57. Macchi Cassia, V., Picozzi, M., Kuefner, D., Bricolo, E., and Turati, C. (2009) Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: Evidence from the composite effect. Developmental Science, 12, 236-248.
58. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., and Mondloch, C.J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
59. Maurer, U., Rossion, B., and Mccandliss, B.D. (2008a). Category specificity in early perception: Face and word N170 responses differ in both lateralization and habituation properties. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 1-7.
60. Maurer, U., Zevin, J.D., and Mccandliss, B.D. (2008b). Left-lateralized N170 effects of visual expertise in reading: Evidence from Japanese syllabic and logographic scripts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1878-1891.
61. Mazard, A., Schiltz, C., and Rossion, B. (2006). Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 44, 912-922.
62. McKone, E. (2004). Isolating the special component of face recognition: Peripheral identification and a Mooney face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 181-197.
63. McKone, E. (2008). Configural processing and face viewpoint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 310-327.
64. McKone, E. (2010). Face and object recognition: How dothey differ? In V. Coltheart (ed.), Tutorials in Visual Cognition, pp. 261-303. New York: Psychology Press.
65. McKone, E. and Grenfell, T. (1999). Orientation invariance in naming rotated objects: individual differences and repetition priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1590-603.
66. McKone, E. and Kanwisher, N. (2005). Does the human brain process objects of expertise like faces? A review of the evidence. In S. Dehaene, J.-R. Duhamel, M. Hauser, and G. Rizzolatti (eds.), From Monkey Brain to Human Brain, pp. 339-356. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
67. McKone, E. and Palermo, R. (2010). A strong role for nature in face recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107 (11), 4795-4796.
68. McKone, E. and Robbins, R. (2007). The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & Bukach. Cognition, 103, 331-336.
69. McKone, E. and Yovel, G. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Towards a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 778-797.
70. McKone, E., Kanwisher, N., and Duchaine, B.C. (2007). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 8-15.
71. McKone, E., Martini, P. and Nakayama, K. (2001). Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 573-599.
72. McKone, E., Brewer, J.L., Macpherson, S., Rhodes, G., and Hayward, W.G. (2007). Familiar other-race faces show normal holistic processing and are robust to perceptual stress. Perception, 36, 224-248.
73. McKone, E., Crookes, K., and Kanwisher, N. (2009). The cognitive and neural development of face recognition in humans. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (IV edn.), pp. 467-482. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
74. McNeil, J.E. and Warrington, E.K. (1993). Prosopagnosia: a face-specific disorder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A, 46, 1-10.
75. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C.-S., and Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for face of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608-615.
76. Minnebusch, D.A., Suchan, B., and Daum, I. (2009). Losing your head: Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of body inversion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 865-874.
77. Moore, C.D., Cohen, M.X., and Ranganath, C. (2006). Neural mechanisms of expert skills in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11187-11196.
78. Morton, J. and Johnson, M.H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164-181.
79. Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., and Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555-604.
80. Op De Beeck, H., Baker, C., Dicarlo, J., and Kanwisher, N. (2006). Discrimination training alters object representations in human extrastriate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 13025-13036.
81. Parr, L.A., Hecht, E., Barks, S.K., Preuss, T.M., and Votaw, J.R. (2009). Face processing in the chimpanzee brain. Current Biology, 19, 50-53.
82. Pascalis, O., De Haan, M., and Nelson, C.A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321-1323.
83. Pellicano, E., Rhodes, G., and Peters, M. (2006). Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces? Developmental Science, 9, 270-277.
84. Perrett, D.I., Smith, P.A.J., Potter, D.D., et al. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 223, 293-317.
85. Pitcher, D., Charles, L., Devlin, J.T., Walsh, V., and Duchaine, B.C. (2009). Triple dissociation of faces, bodies and objects in extrastriate cortex. Current Biology, 19, 319-324.
86. Polk, T.A., Park, J., Smith, M.R., and Park, D. (2007). Nature versus nurture in ventral visual cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of twins. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 13921-13925.
87. Reed, C.L., Stone, V.E., Bozova, S., and Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302-308.
88. Rhodes, G., Byatt, G., Michie, P.T., and Puce, A. (2004). Is the fusiform face area specialized for faces, individuation, or expert identification? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 189-203.
89. Richler, J.J., Gauthier, I., Wenger, M.J., and Palmeri, T.J. (2008). Holistic processing of faces: Perceptual and decisional components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 328-342.
90. Richler, J.J., Mack, M.L., Palmeri, T.J., and Gauthier, I. (2011). Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically. Vision Research, 51, 333-342.
91. Richler, J.J., Bukach, C.M. and Gauthier, I. (2009). Context influences holistic processing of nonface objects in the composite task. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 530-540.
92. Robbins, R. and McKone, E. (2003). Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces? Cognition, 88, 79-107.
93. Robbins, R. and McKone, E. (2007). Noface-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition, 103, 34-79.
94. Rossion, B., Collins, D., Goffaux, V., and Curran, T. (2007). Long-term expertise with artificial objects increases visual competition with early face categorization processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 543-555.
95. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M.J., and Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads toleft-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science, 13, 250-257.
96. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M.J., et al. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. NeuroReport, 11, 69-72.
97. Rossion, B. and Jacques, C. (2008). Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage, 39, 1959-1979.
98. Rossion, B. and Jacques, C. (2009). The N170: Understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain. In S. Luck and E. Kappenman (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of ERP Components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
99. Rossion, B., Kung, C.-C., and Tarr, M.J. (2004). Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 14521-14526.
100. Scapinello, K.F. and Yarmey, A.D. (1970). The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 21, 329-331.
101. Schiltz, C. and Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 32, 1385-1394.
102. Schmalzl, L., Palermo, R., and Coltheart, M. (2008). Cognitive heterogeneity in genetically based prosopagnosia: A family study. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 99-117.
103. Schwarzlose, R.F., Baker, C.I., and Kanwisher, N. (2005). Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11055-11059.
104. Seitz, K. (2002). Parts and wholes in person recognition: Developmental trends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 367-381.
105. Sergent, J. and Signoret, J.-L. (1992). Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 375-388.
106. Simmons, W.K., Bellgowan, P.S.F., and Martin, A. (2007). Measuring selectivity in fMRI data. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 4-5.
107. Slater, A., Quinn, P.C., Hayes, R., and Brown, E. (2000). The role of facial orientation in newborn infants' preference for attractive faces. Developmental Science, 3, 181-185.
108. Sugita, Y. (2008). Face perception in monkeys reared with noexposure to faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 394-398.
109. Tanaka, J.W. and Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43-47.
110. Tanaka, J.W. and Farah, M.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
111. Tanaka, J.W. and Gauthier, I. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In R. L. Goldstone, D. L. Medin & P. G. Schyns (Eds.), Mechanisms of perceptual learning, Vol. 36, pp. 83-125. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
112. Tanaka, J.W., Kiefer, M., and Bukach, C.M. (2004) A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93, B1-B9.
113. Tanaka, J.W. and Sengco, J.A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 583-592.
114. Tanaka, J.W. and Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457-482.
115. Tanaka, J.W., Kiefer, M., and Bukach, C.M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93, B1-B9.
116. Thomas, C., Avidan, G., Humphreys, K., Jung, K.-J., Gao, F., and Behrmann, M. (2008). Reduced structural connectivity in ventral cortex in congenital prosopagnosia. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 29-31.
117. Tsao, D.Y., Freiwald, W.A., Tootell, R.B.H., and Livingstone, M.S. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311, 670-674.
118. Turati, C., Bulf, H., and Simion, F. (2008). Newborns' face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Cognition, 106, 1300-1321.
119. Turati, C., Macchi Cassia, V., Simion, F., and Leo, I. (2006). Newborns' face recognition: Role of inner and outer facial features. Child Development, 77, 297-311.
120. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
121. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
122. Wilmer, J.B., Germine, L., Chabris, C.F., Chatterjee, G., Williams, M., Loken, E., et al. (2010). Human face recognition ability is highly heritable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 5238-5241.
123. Wong, A.C.N., Gauthier, I., Woroch, B., Debuse, C., and Curran, T. (2005). An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 306-318.
124. Wong, A.C.N., Palmeri, T.J., and Gauthier, I. (2009). Conditions for face-like expertise with objects: Becoming a Ziggerin expert - but which type? Psychological Science, 20, 1108-1117.
125. Xu, Y., Liu, J., and Kanwisher, N. (2005). The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise. Neuropsychologia, 43, 588-597.
126. Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
127. Young, A.W., Hellawell, D., and Hay, D.C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.
128. Yovel, G. and Duchaine, B.C. (2006). Specialized face perception mechanisms extract both part and spacing information: Evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 580-593.
129. Yovel, G. and Kanwisher, N. (2005). The neural basis of behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15, 2256-2262.
130. Yovel, G. and Kanwisher, N. (2008). The representations of spacing and part-based information are associated for upright faces but dissociated for objects: Evidence from individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 933-939.
131. Yovel, G., Pelc, T. and Lubetzky, I. (2010). It's all in your head: Why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 759-767.
132. Yue, X., Tjan, B.S., and Biederman, I. (2006). What makes faces special. Vision Research, 26, 3802-3811.
133. Zhu, Q., Song, Y., Hu, S., Li, X., Tian, M., Zhen, Z., et al. (2010). Heritability of the specific cognitive ability of face perception. Current Biology, 20, 137-142.