Face-specific configural processing of relational information

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 19-29

  Leder, Helmut ^a   Carbon, Claus Christian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33644593258     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712605X54794     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 281-316.
2. Carbon, C. C. (2003). Face Processing: Early processing in the recognition of faces. Doctoral thesis. Berlin: DARWIN, Freie Universität Berlin, URL: http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/2003/35/.
3. Carbon, C. C., & Leder, H. (2005). When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces. Perception 34(9), 1117-1134.
4. Carbon, C. C., Schweinberger, S. R., Kaufmann, J. M., & Leder, H. (2005). The Thatcher Illusion seen by the brain: An event-related brain potentials study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 544-555.
5. Collishaw, S. M., & Hole, G. J. (2000). Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception, 29(8), 893-909.
6. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(2), 107-117.
7. Donnelly, N., & Davidoff, J. (1999). The mental representations of faces and houses: Issues concerning parts and wholes. Visual Cognition, 6(3-4), 319-343.
8. Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The face - inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29(2), 159-170.
9. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51A(3), 449-473.
10. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A(2), 513-536.
11. Leder, H., Candrian, G., Huber, O., & Bruce, V. (2001). Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Perception, 30(1), 73-83.
12. Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2004). Part to whole effects and configural processing in faces. Psychology Science, 46(4), 531-543.
13. Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2005). When context hinders. Context superiority versus learn-test-compatibilities in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 58A(2), 235-250.
14. Lee, K. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1997). Presentation-time measures of the effects of manipulations in colour space on discrimination of famous faces. Perception, 26(6), 733-752.
15. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(4), 476-490.
16. McKone, E., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Does the human brain process objects like faces? A review of the evidence. In S. Dehaene, J. R. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkey brain to human (pp. 339-356). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
17. Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31(5), 553-566.
18. Murray, J. E., Yong, E., & Rhodes, G. (2000). Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychological Science, 11(6), 498-502.
19. Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17(1), 43-63.
20. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., & Atkinson, A. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47(1), 25-57.
21. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46A(2), 225-245.
22. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25(5), 583-592.
23. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron, 44(5), 889-898.