When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 235-250

  Leder, Helmut ^a   Carbon, Claus Christian ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 13844271362     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000936     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Donnelly, N., & Davidoff, J. (1999). The mental representations of faces and houses: Issues concerning parts and wholes. Visual Cognition, 6, 319-343.
2. Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., & Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 628-634.
3. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105(3), 482-498.
4. Homa, D., Haver, B., & Schwartz, T (1976). Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: Evidence for a perceptual Gestalt. Memory and Cognition, 4(2), 176-185.
5. Leder, H. (1998). The ATR face databank. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Leder, H., & Bruce,V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A(3), 449-473.
7. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(2), 513-536.
8. Leder, H., Candrian, G., Huber, O., & Bruce, V. (2001). Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Perception, 30, 73-83.
9. Murray, J. E., & Jones, C. (2002). Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A(2), 609-625.
10. Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 221-242.
11. Shepherd, J., Davies, G., & Ellis, H. (1981). Studies of cue saliency. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces. London: Academic Press.
12. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A(2), 225-245.
13. Tanaka, J. W., & Gauthier, I. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In R. L. Goldstone, P. G. Schyns, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation, mechanisms of perceptual learning (Vol. 36, pp. 83-125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 359-380.
15. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, 737-746.
16. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 10, 747-759.