Context influences holistic processing of nonface objects in the composite task

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 530-540

  Richler, Jennifer J ^a   Bukach, Cindy M ^b   Gauthier, Isabel ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION;

EID: 65549134311     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.3.530     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bentin, S., Sagiv, N., Mecklinger, A., Friederici, A., & von Cramon, Y. D. (2002). Priming visual face-processing mechanisms: Electrophysiological evidence. Psychological Science, 13, 190-193.
2. Cheung, O. S., Richler, J. J., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2008). Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 1327-1336.
3. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
4. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
5. Gauthier, I., & Bukach, C. (2007). Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? Cognition, 103, 322-330.
6. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. M., & Collins, D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428-432.
7. Gauthier, I., Klaiman, C., & Schultz, R. T. (in press). Face composite effects reveal abnormal face processing in autism. Vision Research.
8. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
9. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2002). Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 431-446.
10. Ge, L., Wang, Z., McCleery, J. P., & Lee, K. (2006). Activation of face expertise and the inversion effect. Psychological Science, 17, 12-16.
11. Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are "spatial"-Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1023-1039.
12. Hole, G. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65-74.
13. Hole, G. J., George, P. A., & Dunsmore, V. (1999). Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives. Perception, 28, 341-359.
14. Hübner, R. (2000). Attention shifting between global and local target levels: The persistence of level-repetition effects. Visual Cognition, 7, 465-484.
15. Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 640-653.
16. Lawson, R. (2007). Local and global processing biases fail to influence face, object and word recognition. Visual Cognition, 15, 710-740.
17. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449-473.
18. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
19. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2004). Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science, 15, 762-768.
20. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
21. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194-196.
23. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 255-260.
24. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C. S., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608-615.
25. Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31, 553-566.
26. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
27. Perfect, T. J. (2003). Local processing bias impairs line-up performance. Psychological Reports, 93, 393-394.
28. Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., Wong, A. C.-N., & Gauthier, I. (in press). Does response interference contribute to face composite effects? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
29. Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I., Wenger, M. J., & Palmeri, T. J. (2008). Holistic processing of faces: Perceptual and decisional components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 328-342.
30. Richler, J. J., Tanaka, J. W., Brown, D. D., & Gauthier, I. (2008). Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1356-1368.
31. Robbins, R., & McKone, E. (2007). No face-like processing for objectsof-expertise in three behavioral tasks. Cognition, 103, 34-79.
32. Rossion, B., Kung, C.-C., & Tarr, M. J. (2004). Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 101, 14521-14526.
33. Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 904-915.
34. Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M., & Bennett, P. J. (2004). Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14, 391-396.
35. Troje, N., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
36. Wenger, M. J., & Ingvalson, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 872-892.
37. Weston, N. J., & Perfect, T. J. (2005). Effects of processing bias on the recognition of composite face halves. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1038-1042.
38. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (n.d.). RSVP: Experimental control software for Mac OS 9 [Online]. Retrieved June 22, from http://psych.umb.edu/rsvp/.
39. Wong, A. C.-N., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (in press). Conditions for face-like expertise with objects: Becoming a Ziggerin expert-but which type? Psychological Science.1988
40. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
41. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.