Schoolwide Mathematics Achievement Within the Gifted Cluster Grouping Model

Journal of Advanced Academics

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 200-216

  Brulles, Dina ^a   Peters, Scott J ^b   Saunders, Rachel ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^c Cartwright School District   (United States)

Author keywords

achievement; cluster grouping; gifted; grouping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924134454     PISSN: 1932202X     EISSN: 21629536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932202X12451439     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arlin M., Westbury I., (1976). The leveling effect of teacher pacing on science content mastery. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 213-219
2. Barr R., (1989). The social organization of literacy instruction. In McCormick S., Zutell J., (Eds.), National Reading Conference yearbook (Vol. 38, pp. 19-34). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference
3. Barr R., Dreeben R., (1983). How schools work. IL: University of Chicago Press
4. Brulles D., (2005). An examination and critical analysis of cluster grouping gifted students in an elementary school district (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University
5. Brulles D., Saunders R., Cohn S., (2010). Improving performance for gifted students in a cluster grouping model. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
6. Brulles D., Winebrenner S., (2011). Maximizing gifted students’ potential in the twenty-first century. Alexandria, VA: American Association for School Administrators
7. Burnett G., (1995). Ability grouping in elementary schools. New York, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education
8. Burns R., Mason D., (1998). Class formation and composition in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 739-772
9. Calfee R., Brown R., (1979). Grouping students for instruction. In Duke S. L., (Ed.), Classroom management. Seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Pt. 2, pp. 144-182). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
10. Clark K., (2009). The case for structured English immersion. Educational Leadership, 66(7), 42-46
11. Feldhusen J., Moon S., (1992). Grouping gifted students: Issues and concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 63-66
12. Gallagher J., (2004). No Child Left Behind and gifted education. Roeper Review, 26, 121-123
13. Gambrell L. B., Wilson R. M., Gantt W. N., (1981). Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers. Journal of Education Research, 74, 400-404
14. Gentry M., (1999). Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practices through clustered grouping: A research-based alternative heterogeneous elementary classrooms. Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
15. Gentry M., MacDougall J., (2008). Total school cluster grouping: Model, research, and practice. In Renzulli J. S., Gubbins E. J., (Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
16. Gentry M., Owen S. V., (1999). An investigation of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224-243
17. Good T., Stipek D., (1983). Individual differences in the classroom: A psychological perspective. In Fenstermacher G. D., Goodlad J. I., (Eds.), Individual differences and the common curriculum. Eighty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Pt. 1, pp. 9-43). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
18. Hiebert E., (1983). An examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 231-255
19. Kulik J., (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
20. Kulik J., (2003). Grouping and tracking. In Colangelo N., Davis G., (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 268-281). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
21. Lou Y., Abrami P. C., Spence J. C., Poulson C., Chambers B., D’Apollina S., (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458
22. Moody S., Vaughn S., (1997). Instructional grouping for reading. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 347-357
23. Nomi T., (2010). The effects of within-class ability grouping on academic achievement in early elementary years. Journal of Research on Education Effectiveness, 3, 56-92
24. Oakes J., Gamoran A., Page R., (1991). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, consequences, and meaning. In Jackson P., (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York, NY: Macmillan
25. Pikulski J. J., (1991). The transition years: Middle school. In Flood J., Jensen J.M., Lapp D., Squire J.R., (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts (pp. 303-319). New York, NY: Macmillan
26. Plucker J., Burroughs N., Song R., (2010). Mind the (other) gap!: The growing excellence gap in K-12 education. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy
27. Robinson J. P., (2008). Evidence of differential effect of ability grouping on the reading achievement growth of language-minority Hispanics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 141-180
28. Rosenholtz S., Wilson B., (1980). The effect of classroom structure on shared perceptions of ability. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 75-82
29. Slavin R., (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336
30. Tieso C. L., (2002). The effects of grouping and curricular practices on intermediate students’ math achievement (RM02154). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
31. Tomlinson C., Brighton C., Hertberg H., Callahan C., Moon T., Brimijoin K... Reynolds T., (2004). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 119-145
32. Wiggins G., (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
33. Winebrenner S., Brulles D., (2008). The cluster grouping handbook: A schoolwide model. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit
34. Ysseldyke J., Tardrew S., (2007). Use of a progress monitoring system to enable teachers to differentiate mathematics instruction. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24, 1-28